Stanley Meyer replication with low input power

[NerzhDishual]

Salve a tutti,

Are you aware of this patent?
GB 2 324 307 A
Christopher Robert Eccles (UK) - Oct. 1998
Fracture Cell Apparatus

Please, have a look at this document (included file).
IMO, worth to be studied and even tested.

Very Best,
Jean

[sparks]

Salve a tutti,

Are you aware of this patent?
GB 2 324 307 A
Christopher Robert Eccles (UK) - Oct. 1998
Fracture Cell Apparatus

Please, have a look at this document (included file).
IMO, worth to be studied and even tested.

.

This is interesting.  I am sure it would be alot easier to figure out the capacitance of this cell, introduce some inductance, possibly some negative resistance, and couple the whole deal through an avalance diode to a hvdc supply and watch her ring.

[canufi]

     Einstein's mass equivalency statement is cool.  Basically it simply says mass is energy and energy is mass.  It then goes on to predict how much radiant mass you get upon conversion of mass to energy.  This radiant mass is photons.  The water molecule absorbs into it's matter infrared photons which increase the mass of the water molecule.  There are no two ways about it.

When lakes and rivers are hit by sunlight, the water warms up.  If stan was stealing kinetic energy (heat) from water, then the water should become frozen solid in his water fuel cell, or become frozen mist out the tail pipe of his vehicle.

If the water in rivers and lakes is hit with enough sunlight, some of that water in the lakes will form hydrogen and oxygen at the surface.  The water will decompose in lakes. This isn't an energy source because the water is decomposing in the lake, not in the water fuel cell.

Once again, this is why scientists will not accept Stan's device, because no one actually has the answers about how it works.

One important thing to think about, is why does hydrogen set off an avalanche effect and cause water to form if there is a spark. Why doesn't hydrogen always form water without any spark. There is an initial trigger required to get the hydrogen to explode.  Where does the energy actually come from, when the hydrogen is burned. Hydrogen is stable and has no energy floating around in the air - it's only when it is triggered by a spark does it produce the energy.  Scientists take it for granted that hydrogen and gasoline explode, but they don't fully understand why.

If I hold a spark plug near a paper book or piece of wood, that wood will not explode - even though the wood has enormous energy in it. The avalanche effect does not occur with wood, and wood cannot release it's energy with just a spark.

[sparks]

    The acceleration or deacceleration of electrons emit photons.  The electrons in transit from one molecule to another emit various wavelength photons.  In an engine these photons are then absorbed by the relatively inert gas nitrogen.  The nitrogen gains mass.  It's mass gain is distributed over more space.  Same density distributed over more space is gas expansion.    Nitrous has to be injected at high rpm because just a little bit of thermal input allows for a huge amount of expansion.  At low rpm this expansion is so great that the power train can not get the energy to the wheels fast enough and something has to give.  If stan was just taking the hydrogen and oxygen produced by the cell and using only these two products feeding them into the cylinder than it would be a dismal failure.  Atmospheric gasses are coming into the equation here.  These gasses are not coming into the intake at zero degrees kelvin. They too have mass to convert to energy.

[forest]

When lakes and rivers are hit by sunlight, the water warms up.  If stan was stealing kinetic energy (heat) from water, then the water should become frozen solid in his water fuel cell, or become frozen mist out the tail pipe of his vehicle.

If the water in rivers and lakes is hit with enough sunlight, some of that water in the lakes will form hydrogen and oxygen at the surface.  The water will decompose in lakes. This isn't an energy source because the water is decomposing in the lake, not in the water fuel cell.

Once again, this is why scientists will not accept Stan's device, because no one actually has the answers about how it works.

One important thing to think about, is why does hydrogen set off an avalanche effect and cause water to form if there is a spark. Why doesn't hydrogen always form water without any spark. There is an initial trigger required to get the hydrogen to explode.  Where does the energy actually come from, when the hydrogen is burned. Hydrogen is stable and has no energy floating around in the air - it's only when it is triggered by a spark does it produce the energy.  Scientists take it for granted that hydrogen and gasoline explode, but they don't fully understand why.

If I hold a spark plug near a paper book or piece of wood, that wood will not explode - even though the wood has enormous energy in it. The avalanche effect does not occur with wood, and wood cannot release it's energy with just a spark.

Thank you . You comment let me realize important factor. Yes, wood and paper can explode too ! It's all symmetrical which means hydrogen can also combine into water without burning or with just a little heat. Wood and paper can explode in air with initial spark if they are in form of dust. Coal too can explode that way and many solid state materials too. Hydrogen is a gas so it's already in form required for "chain reaction".