Jesse McQueen's Power Generator

[wattsup]

@Hans

The publication date of the application itself should have no bearing on this. It's just the date they published the document. The real dates to consider are there and the spread in time is OK.

Here's a picture of one of my test benches as per the figure 1 of the patent. Will not work, No way. As for the figure 2, have not tried it cause such an investment is too great and chances of success to slim to warrant.

http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,3063.msg45592.html#msg45592

But I do get your point. Something smells not right, but I don't think there has been any expediency on the patent offices' part to push this through quickly or something of that nature. But again, powerful business interest have their way around the system and there is nothing actually that would surprise me.

Maybe I'll give the inventor a telephone call and see directly, from one OU'er to another.

But can I ask you this. Why all the interest? Is something cooking?

wattsup

[Butch]

I believe the problem is that the patent office is so overwhelmed with applications that they have people approving patents that would still approve them if they read them upside down. I believe the patent office is a joke and needs to be rebuilt from the ground up. It's just a cash cow for the government and patent attornies.
Butch LaFonte

[wattsup]

@Hans and all

OK, I spoke with Jesse McQueen this afternoon. He is a very nice sounding person and he was pleased that I called him regarding my e-mail and regarding the overunity.com thread.

He said he will be passing through the site to see what's go'in on.

The discussion lasted a good 20 minutes of which I asked him alot of questions regarding his devices, status of the devices, how he managed to patent the device, etc.

Some of the discussion I cannot talk about simply because he asked me to keep it under wraps for now.

But in essence, he states that Figure #1 has some errors in the drawing since he only saw the patent when it was finished. Even some of the claims have errors in function.

Originally, he had the verbiage in his application as a greater output than input producer, but the patent office explained they will not patent anything that is perpetual motion and suggested that certain things be changed in the verbiage.

Also, there was no special treatment in time factor for patenting the device. He had originally asked his patent attorney to patent this worldwide, but his attorney went ahead and only patented it in the USA.

As for the device, there is no device right now since he is waiting to conclude things with some investment groups to permit the R&D and bringing this "eventually" to market, since devellopment will be costly, all as I had figured, current lack of money and this type of R&D costs money. So even though he holds a patent, he is still some ways from having the device working as per spec and I can sense his reservations of going too public, too soon.

I asked him if he had a time limit from the patent office to produce a device. He said no, that he had 20 years coverage and removing the last three years leaves him with 17 years coverage left.

Now when I think of the extreme learning curve to devellop such a device, I can only wish him the best of success in his endeavours. It won't be an easy task.

[Humbugger]

 

I shant say a word.

[hansvonlieven]

G'day all,

Isn't it funny hat after all this we are at exactly the place where I started from. The guy does not have a working device, yet he does have a monopoly over any over-unity device involving the generation of electricity that anyone might invent over the next 17 years by courtesy of the US patent office.

If that is not a scam, can someone please tell me what it is??

Hans von Lieven