MRA -Magnetic Resonance Amplifier

[ashtweth_nihilisti]

Yes i do after the thread changes, and No, not critical, or rational, just non building,  skeptic and arm chair. Go light up 8 LED's same rating as ours  on .04 watts catalog no is posted. You should of done that FIRST.
it doesn't matter, Your post about the LED's don't matter. I wont explain why to you again.  You go build the MRA and prove your theft THEORY to your self.

Better still go light up 8 LED's same rating as ours same parts rating, on .o4 watts  you go do it. no one cares about your skepticism. Your an arm chair skeptic go build some thing  or you or any one else who does the same will get the blame for spamming this thread and results not being posted here.I have stated Build and share. If you cannot conform to this, then you do not belong in this thread or this thread is useless here for genuine researches.

If you have doubts about the device, then move on, don't contribute to the dis info that's kept the MRA from surfacing for years, i warned about this early, so i think the engineers here will understand where i am coming from. i wont warn you/others again. Since i have no ability to mod here, and no time for these posts. i will be left no choice.

[Koen1]

Yes i do after the thread changes,

Please stop implying that you're going to change your attitue after the thread magically changes into your private blog. (as if that's going to happen)
This is a discussion forum, you rocked up with some claims, and discussing them is what is happening.

and No, not critical, or rational, just non building,  skeptic and arm chair.

Bla bla. Simply not willing to discuss it is what you mean.

Go light up 8 LED's same rating as ours  on .04 watts catalog no is posted. You should of done that FIRST.

Probably mean should
have? So I should have lit up 8 LEDs (you said 9 and I said one plus and additional 8, but I guess that's being too critical and arm-chair again eh?)
to prove the Joule Thief circuit works (already proven, I really don't need to repeat it with 9 LEDs), but you do not have to contemplate the possibility
of the Joule Thief "effect" playing a role in your setup? Right. So you refuse to accept the JT works even though hundreds of people around the world
have already proven it to work, but I may not question your RMA which people generally consider disproven by Puthoff already? That's odd..

it doesn't matter, Your post about the LED's don't matter.

Oh right. Because you don't even want to consider the possibility?

I wont explain why to you again.

"again"? You haven't explained it even once.
All you "explain" is that you choose to ignore Puthoffs analysis, that you choose to not want to even listen to
my LED story, that you choose to declare all posts except those that in your opinion do not support your view worthless.
That is no explanation, that is just showing your arbitrary criteria for selecting what you want to hear.

You go build the MRA and prove your theft THEORY to your self.

What? "Theft theory"? What the heck is that?
And why exactly would I need to build an MRA to see if I can light up 9 LEDs from one weak battery using a Joule Thief type setup?
No, if I'd want to prove that, I'd be better off building a JT circuit and lighting the 9 LEDs with it, and measuring what input that needs.
If then the input needed is comparable to the input you're feeding your MRA (or less), then that would seem to indicate your MRA
setup is in fact a form of Joule Thief.
On the other hand, someone who already has an MRA could easily compare the relative energy input and apparent LED output
with the values available from JT tests. If your MRA clearly lights more LEDs than a JT ever could using the same input,
then you'd have shown that your MRA is most likely not just a Joule Thief.
As long as you're going to tell me to build the MRA and test it, I'm going to tell you to build a JT and test it and compare your
results.

Better still go light up 8 LED's same rating as ours same parts rating, on .o4 watts  you go do it.

Better still, go light up 8 LEDs using a JT and see if that doesn't happen to pull .04 watt.

no one cares about your skepticism.

Oh, and tons of people are just begging for your extremely sunny attitude, I'm sure.
Lol. Do unto others as you would have done to you. If you want to be taken seriously, take others seriously. If you want to receive
replies of others with dismissal and negativity, then don't act all victimised if people reply to you with less than immediate acceptance
of your claims.

Your an arm chair skeptic go build some thing

Haha how dare you accuse people you know nothing of?
I do build things and am certainly not just "an arm chair sceptic". But you wouldn't know, you just want to make me look bad.
Unfortunately that doesn't work well, since I have not attacked you nor accused you of anything, and so it is clear to everyone
that you're being quite childish in your replies.

or you or any one else who does the same will get the blame for spamming this thread and results not being posted here.I have stated Build and share. If you cannot conform to this, then you do not belong in this thread or this thread is useless here for genuine researches.

Nope, again you're off. My posting of serious questions and suggestions of comparison to the Joule Thief is not "spam", as I think the forum admin
will agree with. Also, that you only want people to "build and share" doesn't mean we can't use the forum as it was intended, namely to discuss things.
And why then do you not "build" a Joule Thief and consider the possibility that it may be very closely relatedto the MRA, like I "shared" with you?
Oh, right, it's supposed to be you doing the sharing and us doing the building, right? Lol.

If you have doubts about the device, then move on, don't contribute to the dis info that's kept the MRA from surfacing for years, i warned about this early, so i think the engineers here will understand where i am coming from. i wont warn you/others again. Since i have no ability to mod here, and no time for these posts. i will be left no choice.

You'll have no choice but to what?
Post your full schematics and test results?

Funny thing, you could also just give lots of clear and convincing information, and simply not reply to any posts, if all you want is to get the info out there.
If you have no time for such posts, then simply don't post them.
If the data is convincing enough there will be people replicating it.
Shouting "I don't care about Puthoff's analysis, I don't care about doing more proper tests" does not really fall into the category of "convincing data",
by the way.

Okay, so, are we going to see more videos that show more detail?
Are you going to do a test where you power a larger DC load off your MRA while it runs off a much too weak battery?
After all, LEDs are one thing, actual DC motors for example are something else.

[Grumpy]

All BS aside:

What are the properties of the columnar field that builds around the device?

Norm said that he believes it is an "aetheric field"  - give me some details on this.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

It will not work if the magnet is "cold" and has to warm up for an hour? 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The MRA output follows the position of the sun and moon so there is some sort of gravity effect which Greg Hodowanec describes in his work with earth gravity fields.

As far as gravity effects, we did measure changes in piezo weight after running at resonance with a gain back to normal after turning off the MRA. Same effect as the famous Nieper Ring circuit.

How was this measured?

[ashtweth_nihilisti]

Thread is over, Grumpy you can contact me or find the results on the other forums.

Ash

[Grumpy]

Thread is over, Grumpy you can contact me or find the results on the other forums.

Ash

Too bad.   It is "taboo" to ask twice, so the hell with it.  Never get much with that config anyway.  Input is limited - could never take a loop back from the output.  Relies on ambiant bias fields that don't behave.

Take care and good luck.