Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



advertisement in between postings

Started by Nastrand2000, September 01, 2007, 02:09:24 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Would you pay for ads free membership ? You can vote with 4 votes per user

Yes, if the ads are completely removed and I have access to more test reports
Yes, I would be willing to pay 1 US$ per month
Yes, I would be willing to pay 3 US$ per month
Yes, I would be willing to pay 5 US$ per month
I would only be willing to pay membership money, if I could earn money here with my articles
No, I am poor and have no money, so I want it to be free but with some ads

FreeEnergy

Quote from: hartiberlin on September 02, 2007, 12:41:48 AM
I ask now all users,
who have graphics banners in their signature to
DISABLE them.

You can leave a text link to your homepage, but please
disable your banner, if you have one.

This will really fasten the site loading up and
if you post several times per page will not look
annoying.

I could also install a plugin for disabling it,
but currently I don?t have time for this.

Many thanks.

Regards, Stefan.
ok done. only text ads now :)


peace

z_p_e

Stefan, this is quite a debatable subject, but here's my $0.02.

First, it sounds like more than just the advertising issue needs to be tackled here.

Second, I'm not so sure the "focus" can be divided as it seems you'd like.

So far this site has been an "open" one. By open I mean anyone can register and pretty much post whatever they wish, or not even post at all. "Guests" are allowed and always seem to make up the majority of folks using the forum. What are they contributing? Yet they benefit from the content. Granted the "content" is questionable at times, but that is the world of the "open" forum.

The issues as I see them:

1) Should there be advertising and if so how much?

2) Should folks have the option to pay a subscription that would remove ads?

3) Would these folks then be considered "members" and have more access to certain content?

4) Should members that contribute with "content" be rewarded somehow?

5) Should the "level" of forum content be more closely moderated in an effort to bring up the "professionalism"? This includes more strict control of false and erroneous claims of ou. If the professionalism needs to increase, to what level?

6) Should "guests" be allowed in the forum?

7) If "content" is rewarded, what determines if the content is worthy of a reward, and how much?

8] Will the forum function smoothly with a two-tier system of access, or should a decision be made to go one way or the other?

9) Is there a need for such a radical change in the first place vs. implementing a couple additional ads as has already been done recently?

10) How or why does the number of users affect how much revenue the site needs to generate? i.e. do the operating costs increase with the number of users?

11) Traditionally, folks come and contribute (or not) for free, and "take" for free. Is it time to change this arrangement?


As a start, I would encourage all to consider the above and post your thoughts. For me at least, a simple poll question doesn't address all the necessary issues brought up here. But maybe I'm just off-base.

Regards,
Darren

PS. Stefan, with all the added work and responsibility possibly created by your proposal, you might have less time for bench work than you do even now. Just something to think about, maybe I'm wrong.  :)

canam101

I don't expect this site to be run on the owner's charity; he has to pay bills too; but the number of ads on this site is worse than any other I can think of.  It gives you the impression that the owner has given up his day job and decided to live off what he can make from ads on this site.

The only reason I still come here is that I was able to use Adblock with my firefox browser to get rid of most of the ad crap.

wattsup

Stefan

The rise in clicks is probably due to errors in mouse coordination by users trying to steer through the threads with this new format. As soon as this becomes second nature, the click-thru rates should drop.

Reality has it that with the limited number of daily members on this forum, the total click rate will normally be low. trying to increase this with veteran members to the board will not work.

The ads are also breaking the normal flow of discussions and ideas. We already have members with their repeated slogans at the bottom of their post and some with ads or animated logos, etc. All are distracting especially some of the bigger or flashier ones like TheOne. Also if you balance the inconvenience ratio with that of expected click-thru revenue, I think you will find the former to be higher. The thread should be considered sacred ground. Sides of threads is open territory.

One other point. This forum is a medium for information exchange and should not be involved in financing OU work of particular members. This would only open up a pandoras box of finance meritus and should not be part of this forums raison d'?tre. If you want to raise funds, there are other means that can be used.

- Drawings - sell virtual tickets for a weekly or monthly drawing - prize. Like we'd do in Baseball tournments when I was involved in the directorship, we'd called it half/half. Half the money collected during a game goes to the winner, the other half to the baseball association. This is a great way to raise funds. You can have prices like $2 per ticket, 3 for 5$, 7 for 10$. People can pay by Paypal.

- Ask for donations. Create a donation page, explaining the focus of this forum and it's push for free energy. There are hundreds if not thousands of organisations looking to help those enveadours that have some worth in the OU field.

- Ask for 3, 6 or 12 months subscriptions with two or three levels of membership. This may be a little harder and wind up being non-productive for the quick passer by that may have pertinent, even ground breaking ideas but low funds.

- Create a dedicated sponsors page were sponsors can promote their best deals. You can charge them for the web space.

Sponsors must realize that this is an altruistic forum destined to help mankind and that their participation will only help in the overall scheme of things and it may be a good part of their publicity strategy to help here. But this is difficult to achieve with a Google based ad system.

Guys here put in enough time, money and effort in pushing the envelope that asking them to also be bombarded by these ads, well, this just does not feel right at all.

But, I do understand your position. I use adwords in one of my companies that does water filtration systems on the net. I also know very well that you are looking to secure the future financial stability for the forums good by develloping a good revenue model.

Why don't you ask SM to put in a few thousand from his millions. After all, 25% of the threads are under his topic. OK just jok'in. lol Or, capatalize on the fact that tis forum harbours the most extensive discussions on SM devices. Get access to over 10000 Posts on SM for only XX$.

When pondering a revenue model, you have to access the true value of the service you are rendering.

Now, if a newbie was looking to enter the OU research endevour, chances are, some threads in the forum will be useful to quickly bring him/her up to speed. How much is this worth - the bringing up to speed. The fact that our errors would save others future repetition on the same errors. Well in dollars it's like saving any major effort in the 1000s$ and time saving in the months or years. Alot of the repository information value in the forum has already occured, plus the new threads and continuous growth.

While I am writing this, it has dawned on me that one of the best forms of fund raising would be as follows. A one time membership fee of $25-$50 dollars. As now, people could visit the forum and read as they please, but if they wish to post or see images, they would have to pay a ONE TIME ONLY membership. This would help fund the site without ADS. Question. How much money would the forum make if I clicked on an ad. Maybe 1 cent. So $25 would equal me clicking on 2500 ads. How long do you think it would take me to eventually click on 2500 ads. A long time indeed. So even $10 may be a good membership fee.

What I am trying to say is if you give people the opportunity and an easy method to pay for memberhship, they will still come and be part of this effort. Even if they have no interest in doing their own research, they would still have the opportunity to be part of the effort by helping finance the site.

You could then introduce a FREE PASS, where anyone with some idea to put forth but does not have the money for membership can send the idea to the moderator, who can then access and provide a FREE PASS to the person to become a member. This FREE PASS system must remain confidential between the person applying and the moderator. Others here would not need to know who received a FREE PASS.

shruggedatlas

I have an idea of how to raise funds.  I know that several of the devices mentioned on this forum have already been confirmed as overunity.  Here in the States, if you generate more power yourself than you need (like through solar cells, for example), you can sell it back to the power company.  Maybe it is the same in Europe where Harti lives.  So I propose that Harti just uses one of these overunity devices and sell extra power back to the light company.  This would also be good publicity for the site, as it would prove that we are not just full of hot air, but overunity is real.