Chas Campbell Flywheel Generator

[hansvonlieven]

G'day all,

Found on another thread, thought it appropriate for here.

Actually, Nasa have developed flywheel storage systems as possible replacements to batteries. They use magnetic bearings, and run in a vacuum. The report 50000 rpm. the limiting factor seems to be the tensile strength of the flywheels, which if exceeded, blow up, sending shrapnel flying like bullets. consequently they are encased in heavy steel cylinders and buried underground. They also have an efficiency rating of only 90%.

Hans von Lieven

[ashtweth_nihilisti]

Hi mate the RV is now coupled to his set up, ill have some results for you soon, we have geared it down to spin at the same speed as the RV motor is 2800 RPM, his is 1430 or some thing.
Also  do you want me to post the Gen EXTRACTION circuits here? let me know mate, thanks for the thread.

[wattsup]

Here's a corporate video showing high tech flywheel usage as a battery..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BkQ23jmPPnA

@Ash

Hi Ash, good move.

I imagine the Generator Extraction Circuit you will be using should provide a non VAR current, I hope cause you know Hum. He will look at this with a fine tooth comb and if there are any discrepencies, we can have another round of RV blues.

So I think it is best we wait until your tests have been done and we can convene on the results before putting up the circuit as this may create undue confusion, should there have to be any mods to the circuit after your tests. Let's take this one slow and easy.

Do you know if Chas had a chance to see the designs above. I would be curious to know of his comments, especially to confirm if the original design is indicative of his true orginal design. Also, Please document the changes you made to Chas' original set-up so we can keep track here and I can make a new design.

Based on your prelimienry tests, this will give more information to consider on a potential replication or varitions thereof. But please keep the numbers this time, OU or not. Every test pushes the device to reveals its secrets. The more info on hand, the better we can decide aftewards on any next moves.

[ashtweth_nihilisti]

I share Hans' opinion of the potential. 

I'll keep my comments very short and try to stay out of it here for the most part. 

If I see any snake-oil salesman claims of great arcing torrents of free energy based on obtuse inaccurate suspicious output peak pulse power levels into reactive loads measured with rusted fish scales, Ouija boards and pulse-clutched deProny brakes, I will probably chime in with some little tirade or two.

Please watch out for the hocus pocus time/power/energy/pulsed output vs. steady input shell game.  There is plenty of opportunity to fool yourselves and "the audience" into thinking you've got OU when really you're at 53% energy efficiency.

No pretending VAR are watts and no comparing peak instantaneous output pulses against average continuous input...you know...the regular flim flam stuff. 

Measure the total actual useful forward energy flow with good trustworthy instruments, correct loads and proper techniques and old Humbugger will just sit and watch.




Humbugger Out


And remember...there are prizes!   Red and black stars for bad boys; gold stars for good boys!  And girls, too!

Just to clarify for the board, as i don't address this user name.

The VAR and reactive power in the RV is measured and extracted using circuitry which taps the RF nodes/resonance, and or the peak sine waves through his non conventional understanding.

All explanations of this [How its done measured plus how we don't series load resonance] are in the compilations. These circuits are from TEST RESULTS which have reported extraction of resonance or RF or reactive power , the circuits tested are posted in the compilations.

The loads were batteries [resistive/mechanical] this is posted in the compilations, We already stated that the duty cycle is needed (as per Stefans advice) to Confirm the pulsed out puts and made this very clear.

so again this suspicious or un educated person, could be fooling U, besides himself.
Beware of ANY Oil men/wanna be/ unknowingly working for them/arm chair skeptics or any one in between  who state the RV prony does not work based on none of their test results, or that the claim to know how the extraction process is done based on no knowledge of whats being done and no test results by them.


this person or persons are not qualified to test and or report the RV, he/she does not under stand it, nore has he/she built it and or should try. if you take this advice, do not expect any results.
or expect any sympathy from me you have been warned.

ashtweth

[ashtweth_nihilisti]

Here's a corporate video showing high tech flywheel usage as a battery..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BkQ23jmPPnA

@Ash

Hi Ash, good move.

I imagine the Generator Extraction Circuit you will be using should provide a non VAR current, I hope cause you know Hum. He will look at this with a fine tooth comb and if there are any discrepencies, we can have another round of RV blues.

So I think it is best we wait until your tests have been done and we can convene on the results before putting up the circuit as this may create undue confusion, should there have to be any mods to the circuit after your tests. Let's take this one slow and easy.

Do you know if Chas had a chance to see the designs above. I would be curious to know of his comments, especially to confirm if the original design is indicative of his true orginal design. Also, Please document the changes you made to Chas' original set-up so we can keep track here and I can make a new design.

Based on your prelimienry tests, this will give more information to consider on a potential replication or varitions thereof. But please keep the numbers this time, OU or not. Every test pushes the device to reveals its secrets. The more info on hand, the better we can decide aftewards on any next moves.

There will be no RV [OU] blues if you stick to the replication data i recommend,
prony, and the neon switcher and or Freq driving a PM Gen.

>So I think it is best we wait until your tests have been done and we can convene on the results before putting up the circuit as this may create undue confusion, should there have to be any mods to the circuit after your tests. Let's take this one slow and easy.

This is up to you, we have many extraction circuits already done to test, ill post the results here, and leave them till after the test.

>Do you know if Chas had a chance to see the designs above. I would be curious to know of his comments, especially to confirm if the original design is indicative of his true orginal design. Also, Please document the changes you made to Chas' original set-up so we can keep track here and I can make a new design.

Yes i have sent them to Chas and i can get this information for you on the 15th easy, maybe you can use this info, and draw a new one? then compare it with photos of his original?

"First build a flywheel that will produce at least twice as much energy as you need to drive your alternator when finished you should have trouble seeing it moving as it runs in its own space, After a few trial runs i built one by having a h-t steel shaft keeyed each end before a flange or a disc was slipped along to the center and welded the flange was then drilled and tapped to take studs, using a router i cut a circle 600mm in diameter out of custom board with a hole in the center to take the shaft this was attached to the flange using studs with washers and lock nuts the second circle had a hole in the center large enough to fit over the flange this was fitted from the other end and screwed to the first wheel by doing this i could try diffrent speeds and drives until i was satisfied i had a combination that would work with what i had which was a .075 hp single phase electric motor and a 3.5 kva alternator,The flywheel ended up being 72mm thick and 590mm in diametor i then fitted a steel band around my wheel this added more power my theory being if you create centrifugal force you can drive anything as long as the wheel keeps spinning I ended up with an alternator fitted with a 4.5inch pulley driven by a 9inch pulley the alternator speed was 3146rpm at that speed it was easy to run electrical applicances for a period now to the most important part to keep the wheel spinning"

http://www.panacea-bocaf.org/res/Default/ESS_PasteBitmap0003.png

>Based on your prelimienry tests, this will give more information to consider on a potential replication or varitions thereof. But please keep the numbers this time, OU or not. Every test pushes the device to reveals its secrets. The more info on hand, the better we can decide aftewards on any next moves.

Yes of cause thanks To Stefan the numbers will be easy to confirm..