Chas Campbell Flywheel Generator

[sm0ky2]

"Lead Out" is not really a thing...


Its' just a coin-term invented by Tseung to promote his
b.s. theories.

[Toolofcortex]

Yeah let him experiment and spend his money.

Hes motivated.

[JulesP]

Please try the idea of a hidden eccentric, thus allowing pulley tension to be varied.

A motor with a solid connection to a flywheel (input accumulator), an intermediate wheel with shifting that is constantly disconnecting and reconnecting, and a final grand wheel, with possible gearing for this particular wheel.

Perhaps you can make a squeeze wheel underneath, that bounces on the pulley and acts as a limit.

You could possible make this symetric or phase controlled almost, and double your input with a second motor, to "pulse on a pulse". Perhas even magnets in a bedini-esque fasion.

But magnets suck compared to flywheels. Flywheels are like the perfect pulse device, they have absolutely "zero output impedance" , not even .1 ohms like batteries.

Anyways, play with such things. Plan ahead, be flexible. Use telemetry, sensors, encoders, know the timing diagram of it, that way you can be creative.

You are building a test bench, you are not replicating a "insert name" device.

Good luck.

Hi again,

Your suggestions are very specific which gives me the impression that you have yourself developed or contemplated some flywheel generator designs, that presumably were found wanting?

My approach, as with my build of a solid state pulsed induction 'Bediniesque' system (see my report and files at: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/cwlace7c8hi6hxn/AACQkxPpZlc3SK3dd2Me5piba?dl=0) is to do a thorough review of all the literature to get some sort of theory of how the device might work, or at least some theoretical proposition to test, and then build a design in Fusion360 CAD as this clarifies the practical logistics.

In a real way the actual build is the final stage and sits on top of a lot of soul searching and questioning to justify the expense and garner the motivation to pursue the project to completion.

On the theory and design side I have written to libra_spirit and am awaiting a reply and also chased up Rakarskiy and found he has produced a book looking at a range of OU devices. What I am not sure yet is if he has simply observed freely available video and other material on each of them and then tried to reverse engineer the specifics or if he has been in actual communication with some or all of them and then written up actual construction details supplied by the developers. The former is more opinions and informed guesswork while the latter is more useful and fact based. I aim to write to him to clarify but he also seems to have built a few devices according to his videos.

So I need to collate all the info from different sources, including members here if they have something useful, and start to coalesce something specific. I'm happy to share such growing ideas on the forum and indeed the whole process.
My ultimate aim is to find a system that has a CoP>4 and which can be readily replicated, write it up thoroughly and scientifically and make if freely available to all and anyone who is open to such info. In my retired status I don't wish or need to make money from anything and besides the world desperately needs this sort of information and small communities such as where I live would welcome options to get off grid and be a lot greener.

Jules

[Grumage]

   

Middle photo shows eccentric " bouncing " intermediate drive with " pendulum " actuator. Pendulum weight is not fitted in the photo.

Cheers Graham.

[Grumage]

Oh....

And before you ask, I went solar the following year.... never looked back!!