new powerfull gravity turbine at perpetual motion

[shruggedatlas]

If your idea has true merit and will indeed effect the energy industry, then like those who came before you, you will likely be silenced by whatever means deemed necessary, and your idea will never see the light of day.

You mean like they silenced Leonardo DaVinci?  I think the only thing that has so far silenced perpetual motion are the laws of physics, as we understand them.

Usama, feel free to keep your invention private, if you so desire.  Profit is a great motivator, and hopefully it will cause someone to produce something revolutionary someday in the field of free energy.

[Gearhead]

I have been on the Bessler forum for years and have seen many designs come and go.  Hundreds of years ago people tried making a gravity wheel work by making one side heavier or the weights farther from center than the other.

What it all really boils down to is that on a wheel the weight must rise as far as it falls and therefore there is no excess energy.

It might be possible to get some other forces working in your favor like inertia or centrifugal force, but as far as I know Bessler is the only person to ever build a successful gravity wheel and he took the concept with him when he died.

[hansvonlieven]

G'day Usama and all,

Come back when you have built something. Things that are only in the mind or on paper are often not real, as are Youtube videos. The only way there is to prove (even to yourself) the validity of your theories is to build the thing and study its behaviour.

Hans von Lieven

[usama salah]

good day
and thanks for all
i will take care of all your recommandations

first let me ask a some questions:
1-  if we put 101 books each over other , every book = 1 kg ,
how much weight do the first book from bottom carry up = ?

2- if each book has 10cm then we have 1010 cm in high,
how much force we need to move one book up for 1010 cm at one second by any way of newton law =?

3- to make a perpetual motion ,
if we get the first book from the bottom out, then we have two actions 
    a- the 100 books will fall down for just 10 cm by  gravity power of 100 kg at less than one second
    b- we need less than 2 kg to move this free book up and put it on the top ( reconstruct the poiential power of 101 books).

( that is not a wheel but we can put evry book on the one side arms of a wheel ,or like steam wheel )


   with comparing between what we gain and what we lose for reconstruct our shape in the meaning of power if we could do that automaticly, we observe that it's possible to make a perpetual motion that generate more power than it used for keep rotating ( it dosn't use all its power) , then the problem is how to desing this automatic motion or perpetual motion.

this is not my invention at all ,this is a facts and i tried to explain it in other view to make somebody believe of gravity energy, and i hope that.


also , when we gain a little amount of power from any gravity wheel, and we use a multi wheel at one axle then we gain more power from this axle as a turbine.

the problem is, how is the good design looks like ? and who can or could do it ?


at last i will give you a very simple design for my gravity wheel as soon as i can , and please make your mind to find out the relation between gravity wheel and flotation wheel , and between gravbity effect and flotation effect. and what is the theory that make you  use any power to rotat the same wheel ( wind,fallwater,gravity,magnetic,flotation,.....) with a simple change of some parts.
you can draw it on a paper before any prototype.

i hope my boring english not effect my object meaning

[hansvonlieven]

G'day Usama,

Never be ashamed of your English, we all had to learn it sometime, it"ll get better with time. I am sure few of us would be competent in your language, whatever that is.

As to your example of a stack of books you must consider the amount of force required to liberate the bottom book and allow the rest of the stack to drop. Don't forget in your calculation that the entire weight of the stack sits on it.

Hans von Lieven