new powerfull gravity turbine at perpetual motion

[hansvonlieven]

who can stop this simple wheel at its perepetual motion ? and why
go to this link
http://usamasalah.blogspot.com/

The better question would be: Who can START this wheel to rotate?

Hans von lieven

[usama salah]

this wheel not have only 4 arm
and between 6 clock and 12 there are  a number of mass enough to start its rotat for balance position , also the other side is avoid of mass , how we keep it avoid of mass maybe the quiation

[AB Hammer]

Greetings Hans

Nice to see you back, of course I am one to be talking. LOL

I find what usama salah has been posting intreaging, I think it is still a modified MT67 but with with a ramp to help push the water/fluid. Nothing really new from my outlook, but I see problems, like jamming of the plunger from angular forces caused by the ramp. And if it did run at all it would wear out fast and not go at any real speed due to friction. I have to look at it as problematic. But I will give his project a good start.

[hansvonlieven]

G'day all,

The problem with Usama's designs, the modified MT87 and the current one is that there in not enough power in either system to force the liquid to the top.

Take the MT87, the plunger that has to come down in order to force the liquid up has to be HEAVIER than the liquid it displaces or it would float. Which means you now have even have MORE weight where you don't want it.

The current design relies on the assumption that in takes less energy to push water uphill than it generates going downhill, a ludicrous proposition.

Study it. Usama would be well served to study a book on elementary physics. He has NO idea.

Hans von Lieven

[usama salah]

Study it. Usama would be well served to study a book on elementary physics. He has NO idea

that is right prof , i don't said before that i'm a scientific teacher or specialist, also maybe i don't have enough physics knowledge  but with all that ,  I HAVE A GOOD IDEA.
if you as a scientific teacher can't see or understund the new mechanical IDEA for doing this work and said there is no IDEA , THIS  IS A PROBLEM  WITH YOUR STUDENTS NOT FOR ME , you see no idea other see good idea ,right or wrong but the fact there is an IDEA, OK

TO make you maybe understand, because of my differant language,
1- any mechanical work as a piston need specific amount of force to do its job whatever its job is = x
2- if you put enough weight at one side of any wheel antil the torque = x , and use some more weight at the same side , then you can use this torque or force of axis to do the work you need for the piston,
so after doing  whatever the piston job with this force you will find yourself at the same position
3- then the problem is how to put enough weight at one side to gain the force you need to do the piston job , how to keep the other side avoid of the additional weight and how we can gain extra energy from that if it is true.
4- the problem is not if we violate the law or not , our problem is HOW WE CAN USE THE PHYSIC LAW to do such perpetual motion in respect of this law.
5- THE NEW IDEA HERE IS THAT WHEEL IS RESPECT ALL THE PHYSICS LAW AND NO CLAIM OF VIOLAT IT

now i'm verey sorry that i came or visited this forum because there is no differant between it AND other forum just labe labe la
and i agree with hans , THERE IS NO IDEA OF WHAT WE TALK ABOUT

AND KEEP IN TOUCH AT MY SITE