Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Tesla Switch need help

Started by TheOne, September 16, 2007, 07:27:52 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Thaelin

@ Groundloop
   Hey just thought I would post this at ya and see what you think. Since you stated that the traces burn with no load on the system, then that brings to mind that you had a path for the current to flow. Namely, I mean the MosFets. They have a very fast turn on time and low internal resistance. This makes the switching critical. If you look at the pictoral in the D6b.pdf of the mechanical switch, you will notice 70 degree gaps in the conductors. That basicly forms a "Break before Make" type of switch.
   If you have a dual trace scope you will be able to see what I mean by scoping channel 1 on one set of fets and ch2 on the other. Then set to a very short sample time and see the overlap. I would suspect you are using the same signal just inverted to switch all six transistors.
   In all essence, you have an intermittent short happening and thus a lot of heat. There should be all but "NO" current flow on this without a load. Simply no load, each side will switch from parallel to serial connection but no flow between.

   On top of that, I have manually hooked up the circuit and included the caps and can get no output per se. I cant see how this will function with them in the works. Time will tell, I just finished chargeing 4 idenical 12v5ah gels and in the process of setting it up with 555's to form the break before make switching.  Have fun and lets make this fly

thaelin


Quote from: Groundloop on January 01, 2008, 05:35:49 AM
@Plengo,

I used 6 resistors to limit the max. current for each switch. My circuit is now running cool with
no wasted heat. All four batteries is slowely discharging even with no load on the output.

@Maxc

I think the circuit you posted is a better way to do it. Switching charge between capacitors and
just refill the needed power due to loss in the circuit. I will use my circuit but modify my capacitor
and diode board to switch between capacitors via a transformer.

Groundloop.

Groundloop


Groundloop


Thaelin

@ Groundloop

   Okies, now I see why you have constant current flow. The transformer. I have no transformer and thus no path.  ;)

   My setup is via the original Brandt 1983  bratt.jpg circuit. Verbetim. It works well. But therein lies the missunderstanding. I will be adding the triggers today and then fire it up and let it run to see what goes.

@plengo
    :P   Waiting to hear more on your setup.

thaelin

Groundloop