Giantkiller moves forward into Full Heterodyning.

[Drossen]

Dr. Winningham works in the Space Science and Engineering Department, which is in the building across the street from ours.  I have never met him though.

Drossen

[Feynman]

@Drossen:  Yes!

The electron mass is interchangable with the frequency.  They are identical in quantum electrodynamics.


Wave amplitude of the electron:

Figure 1.  Electron Structure.  The upper diagram shows a cross-section of the spherical wave structure, something like the layers of an onion.  It is comprised of an inward moving wave and an outward moving wave.  The two waves combine to form a single dynamic standing wave structure with its center as the nominal location of the electron.  Note that the amplitude of a quantum wave is a scalar number, not an electromagnetic vector.  Thus these waves are part of quantum theory, not electric theory.  At the center the quantum wave amplitude (and the electric potential) is finite, not infinite, in agreement with the observed electron (Wolff, 1995).  The lower diagram shows the same quantum wave amplitude plotted along a radius outwards from the electron center. The lower diagram is a 'slice' from the upper diagram.

Figure 2.  Radial Plot of the Electron Structure.  When the IN and OUT quantum waves combine they form a standing wave.  This detailed plot, the same as the approximate lower plot of Fig. 1 above, corresponds exactly to the equations below.  The envelope of the wave amplitude matches the Coulomb potential everywhere except at the center, where it is not infinite in agreement with the observations of Lamb and Retherford.  If the electron were moving and observed by another detector atom with relative velocity v, the deBroglie wavelength appears as a Doppler effect on both  waves.  The frequency mc2/h of the waves was first proposed by Schroedinger and deBroglie,  proportional to the mass of the electron.  This frequency is the mass so that mass measurements are actually frequency measurements.  There is no mass 'substance' in nature

http://www.quantummatter.com/articles_html/body_spin.html

[giantkiller]

Nature abhors a vaccum.

You will not likely find one. A vaccum is perceived by the lack of knowledge to explain what is not understood.

--giantkiller

[Feynman]

Looks like all you TPU guys are proved right by pure quantum mechanics.    Throw the standard model in the trash can.  Physics can be rebuilt entirely with waves.


"The simplest resonance is the electron whose mathematical physical structure is exactly  known. Electron waves (comprising all charged particles) extend to infinity serving as the  'communicator' of the natural laws. In contrast, the hadrons exist in a closed, high  density region of high-frequency waves analogous to waves inside a drum or a hollow  sphere.  No one is sure.  It is thought that the many modes of possible  vibration in the closed space correspond to the many types of hadron particles.  All  the qualitative properties point to this conclusion.  But no mathematical solutions of these 3D wave modes have been investigated.  Mathematicians, please rise to the  challenge!"

and



"When seeking origins, it is important not to inadvertently  use existing laws to deduce themselves.  Although the quantum laws of quantum particles can be extrapolated to large macro-objects,  the inverse is not possible.  Such circular reasoning can occur if, for example, an e-m field or mechanical model from macro-physics is assumed to be the structure of a quantum particle.   Logically, finding the origins of existing laws requires forming new concepts that nevertheless satisfy observed data.  It is a major result of this article to further deduce that most of the natural laws originate from the properties of the quantum waves of the charged particles (electron, proton,etc) , and the properties of the space (ether, vacuum,etc.) which is formed from the totality of all those particle quantum waves.  One such effect is already known as Mach's Principle which asserts that inertia is a result of an inertial reference frame established by all matter in the universe. "

Now we are starting to use the same language sparks! 


http://quantummatter.com/articles_html/body_point.html


PS


"The discovery of these origins from the work of this article  creates a radical new picture of the physical world:  quantum mechanics and relativity are in a sense united, origins of forces are understood,  puzzles and paradoxes are explained and, most important, relationships between microphysics (electrons and particles) and the universe (cosmology) are seen to be a result of an all-pervading  "space" (the vacuum or ether) filled with oscillating quantum (particle)  waves.

The reader should be aware that he is evaluating a new  basic proposal that  all natural science results  from just three assumptions about the properties of space. "

PPS

"Nobel laureate Paul Dirac, who developed much of the theory describing the quantum waves of the electron, was never satisfied with its point-particle character because the Coulomb electron required a mathematical correction termed "renormalization".  In 1937, he wrote,  "This is just not sensible mathematics.  Sensible mathematics involves neglecting a quantity when it turns out to be small ? not neglecting it because it is infinitely large and you do not want it! ""

[Feynman]

Okay so that theory I posted is pretty good, but it's got some problems.

http://www.quantummatter.com/
Wolf's 'Space Resonance'  Quantum Electrodynamics

Advantages:

simplifies everything into waves
works on QED, special relativity, and classical laws
eliminates the 'renormalization' shell-game
elegant, compelling beauty

Disadvantages:

does not explain "accelerating" universe
does not account for dark energy or dark matter
does not account for broken symmetry

(...but then again, neither does the standard model.  )


We can probably modify Wolf's theory.  It's definitely way better foundation than the standard model.