Accelerated flow vs. constant flow...

[Bessler007]

Hello P-Motion,

Of course I don't mind.

Recently I was looking at a discussion about movement along the z-axis as if it were some silver bullet to perpetual motion.  I don't think that's the case.  At some point in time you want gravity to catch the mass and project it's energy on to the plane of rotation.  The more room you give the mass to move the more time it takes.  There's only so much time and in my opinion you can't afford to be wasting it.

The displacement of mass in three dimensions that is changing wrt to a rotation should be 4 dimensions.  Time is a dimension and, at least the way I've looked at it, acceleration is also.  When mass is displaced laterally wrt the 2 dimensional plane of rotation you're eating valuable time.

Sometimes I'm not to clear on a point.  Here is the point.  Attempt to understand what you're doing to the highest degree  you possibly can.  That's the method I use to come to conclusions and I strongly recommend it.  I don't mind suggesting methods and I do that.  At times I'll share my conclusions.  I just did that in the second paragraph.

The solution to perpetual motion is no small matter.  If it's possible it's a very valuable thing.

  Bessler, Mind if I ask what you mean by a 4 dimensional curve or radius ?
I know a path (x,y and z) would be 3 dimensional and mass and velocity can add 2 more.
  A wheel could be 4 dimensional. Is this what you're refering to ?

[Bessler007]

P-Motion,

It might be less expensive to make a form and pour concrete to get your weights.  If you're looking for a lot of precision that might not be an answer.  Lead is easy to work with.

It's always good to reduce  your expenses.  Best of luck.



probably some duplication:
1,340,000 for perpetual motion. (0.11 seconds)