Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



FE using Capillary action

Started by Omega_0, September 29, 2007, 04:00:04 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Omega_0

I got this idea while pondering over this news :
http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,3388.0.html

Capillary action requires no external energy. (Correct me if I'm wrong). Water rises 14 cms in a tube of 0.1 mm radius all by itself.

If one takes an inverted Y shaped tube, with one leg dipped in the water and other leg(shorter, so that it stays above the water surface) with two gates at the junction and opens the gate which is not immersed in water periodically, one can make a tiny waterwheel turn using this falling water perpetually.

Water won't fall out of the capillary, so one needs a material which can also expand/contract, so that by changing the diameter, water flows out.

Now the question is - whether the energy gained will be greater that that required to open/close the gates and expand/contract the tube?
What do you guys think about it? I guess there is a catch, otherwise someone would have done it already ;)
I have more respect for the fellow with a single idea who gets there than for the fellow with a thousand ideas who does nothing - Thomas Alva Edison