Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



SMOT! - (previously about the OC MPMM)

Started by rotorhead, October 03, 2007, 11:01:31 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 8 Guests are viewing this topic.

Low-Q

Here the steel ball is forced away from the SMOT - right before it enters it:

Omnibus

Don't bother. You can't prove the unprovable. Like I said, learn some physics first and then come back for a discussion.

hoptoad

Quote from: Omnibus on January 12, 2008, 08:50:00 PM
You can't prove the unprovable.
You should take note of your own words regarding your own unproved  violation of C of E claims!

Pirate88179

Low-Q makes a good point.  I have always wondered about this. I have experimented with magnets for a long time now, including the SMOT.  It takes "energy" to place the ball in a position to be influenced by the SMOT and this should not be ignored.

Bill
See the Joule thief Circuit Diagrams, etc. topic here:
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=6942.0;topicseen

Omnibus

@Pirate88179,

Make no mistake, @Low-Q has no point, let alone his confusion about the difference between force and energy (which he denies but he actually has). To understand this analysis always think of the energy of the ball and of nothing else. That's first. Second, always think of the energy that the ball has exactly at A, at B and at C before it gets back exactly at A. If CoE were obeyed the ball would have lost the exact amount |(mgh1 - (Ma - Mb))| of energy, which the ball has acquired when moved from A to B, in spontaneously going back exactly along the same route but in the opposite sense--from B back to A. The ball in the discussed case, however, goes spontaneously along a different route whereby it loses also energy Mb it has at B in moving spontaneously towards C (which it wouldn't have lost if it were to go back spontaneously from B directly back to A thus obeying CoE). I've explained this many, many times and I don't think one needs to repeat it constantly because someone confuses enegy with force or has other gaps in understanding physics.