Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



SMOT! - (previously about the OC MPMM)

Started by rotorhead, October 03, 2007, 11:01:31 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 8 Guests are viewing this topic.

Koen1

Quote from: Omnibus on January 28, 2008, 12:18:23 PM
Quote from: Koen1 on January 28, 2008, 12:16:45 PM
And why don't you read what I write before posting?

Post a video of your closed loop SMOT!
Then get back to your mathematics ad infinitum.

You can calculate how much the ball might roll all you want, but that still doesn't make the ball actually roll.
First make the ball roll continuously. Then calculate for us how much energy is produced.

Read what I write and don't clutter the thread with nonsense.
That's what I said. Stop copying me!

And where's your video? I still don't see your closed loop SMOT...

Or have you decided that, if you can't actually convince us with proof, you're going to try to baffle us with bullshit?

What is so diffucult to understand about my posts? It's very simple: you should stop posting kilometers of text and mathematics
in fruitless ateempts to convince people here, and you should start building this claimed closed looped SMOT and filming it, then posting your videos here for us all to watch in awe and humility.

If you refuse to do that, then what reason do we have to assume your mathematics is sound?
Repeating the same thing over and over again is not a way of explaining, nor of convincing people.
Don't you see that?
You're like the typical stereotype tourist who doesn't speak the language and for some illogical reason is convinced that simply repeating himself much louder will magically make the natives understand English.
A much more effective way would be to act it out, and people can watch and understand.

supersam

@omnibus,

show me the numbers!!  not a bunch of hypothical, bs!  show me the numbers for mass. show me the numbers for your variables.  all of them!!  or shut the f up.

lol
sam

ps:  i know this is blunt, but!

Omnibus

Quote from: Koen1 on January 28, 2008, 04:05:21 PM
Quote from: Omnibus on January 28, 2008, 12:18:23 PM
Quote from: Koen1 on January 28, 2008, 12:16:45 PM
And why don't you read what I write before posting?

Post a video of your closed loop SMOT!
Then get back to your mathematics ad infinitum.

You can calculate how much the ball might roll all you want, but that still doesn't make the ball actually roll.
First make the ball roll continuously. Then calculate for us how much energy is produced.

Read what I write and don't clutter the thread with nonsense.
That's what I said. Stop copying me!

And where's your video? I still don't see your closed loop SMOT...

Or have you decided that, if you can't actually convince us with proof, you're going to try to baffle us with bullshit?

What is so diffucult to understand about my posts? It's very simple: you should stop posting kilometers of text and mathematics
in fruitless ateempts to convince people here, and you should start building this claimed closed looped SMOT and filming it, then posting your videos here for us all to watch in awe and humility.

If you refuse to do that, then what reason do we have to assume your mathematics is sound?
Repeating the same thing over and over again is not a way of explaining, nor of convincing people.
Don't you see that?
You're like the typical stereotype tourist who doesn't speak the language and for some illogical reason is convinced that simply repeating himself much louder will magically make the natives understand English.
A much more effective way would be to act it out, and people can watch and understand.

Stop posting nonsense. All these questions have been answered. Read what I write and try to understand it. If you can't, as is obviously the case, restrain from cluttering the already too cluttered thread.

Omnibus

Quote from: supersam on January 28, 2008, 04:28:34 PM
@omnibus,

show me the numbers!!  not a bunch of hypothical, bs!  show me the numbers for mass. show me the numbers for your variables.  all of them!!  or shut the f up.

lol
sam

ps:  i know this is blunt, but!
You shut up. What I've presented is enough to conclude the SMOT violates CoE.

supersam

   omnibus, 

what is your problem?  all i have asked you for is some, simple, if you have actually done the experiment, quantatative numbers, that should correspond perfectly, with the maths that you, reguarly cling to, like a rabbit caught in a snair.  please just put one value to any of the variables that you present as absolute truth of the violation of the COE to light.  i, dare you!   obviously you do not want the real proof to come to light.  you are so funny!

lol
sam