SMOT! - (previously about the OC MPMM)

[supersam]

@ runningbear,

touche!  the blades are deflecting the wind and creating a vacuum!  the same as tacking.  or the same principle that puts great big hunks of metal in the sky.   though it is an interesting way of doing it.

lol
sam

ps:  never new there was that much power!

pss: if i had to bet i would say a little tailwind was added,  or, " E hand"!

[modervador]

touche!  the blades are deflecting the wind and creating a vacuum!  the same as tacking.  or the same principle that puts great big hunks of metal in the sky.   though it is an interesting way of doing it.

It is indeed the same as tacking. The windmill is a sail on a spiral tack, with a component of its motion at a right angle to the wind just like a tacking sail. It is connected to a gear reduction which powers the wheels. It trades power at high velocity and low drag (windmill) for power at low velocity and high force (wheels) , completely consistent with conservation of energy.

[Low-Q]

   omnibus, 

what is your problem?  all i have asked you for is some, simple, if you have actually done the experiment, quantatative numbers, that should correspond perfectly, with the maths that you, reguarly cling to, like a rabbit caught in a snair.  please just put one value to any of the variables that you present as absolute truth of the violation of the COE to light.  i, dare you!   obviously you do not want the real proof to come to light.  you are so funny!

lol
sam

I have already presented the real proof. If you don't understand that, that's your problem.

I think the problem does not lie there. The problem is that the hand determinds where B is suppose to be located. "Accidently" the hand determind to place B where the ball don't roll backwards and falls back directly to A, but rolls forward to C. Honestly, I cannot understand you're not seeing this.

Vidar

[Low-Q]

I'm not perfect, but let us at least TRY to be more objective. Anyone should know ones place, competent or incompetent. That includes @omnibus too.

Vidar

[supersam]

@vidar,

exactly, but, how do you show that with "no numbers", the one being a given.

lol
sam