Is water a battery?

[hartiberlin]

@Evil Roy Slade
are you only here to put negativity into the forum ?

It was proven, that Stanley Meyer had an overunity process
running and could generate at least 5 to 10 times more HHO
gas than Faraday law predicts from normal electrolysis.

Lately user Ravi has acomplished the same.

[Evil Roy Slade]

@Evil Roy Slade
are you only here to put negativity into the forum ?

It was proven, that Stanley Meyer had an overunity process
running and could generate at least 5 to 10 times more HHO
gas than Faraday law predicts from normal electrolysis.

Lately user Ravi has acomplished the same.

I am here to hopefully provide some reality.

I have great respect for the people here who put so much time and effort into their work. However when I know it's in pursuit of a proven unattainable goal I feel obligated to say something. As an Electronics, Mechanical and Software Engineer (Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology) for 25 years I reckon I know a thing or two.

As administrator you can tell me to go away and I will, no problem for me.

Please direct me to the proof of Stanley Meyer's process from an independant source.
And perhaps the same for user Ravi.

I assume you have seen this: http://www.waterfuelcell.org/moreinfo.html

[sanmankl]

Hello Stefan,

Being a lurker in a lot of forums on FE, I have seen my fair share of people who will see differently.

I'm a "doer", hates do do the maths, calculations and the theories so I take the approach of trying it out, building it, get it to work and then see if I can improve on it? What drives me is the hope of going OU but I will settle for less like in the case of hydroxy, if I can't get enough gas to run an engine, I'll make it into a booster. Believe me, I have built stuff that is junk due to my inexperience and lack of know-how but I think I am persistant enough not to be deterred by setbacks and failures.

There may be others that will say I'm wasting my time but I see it as part of the education process. So, if you are new and want to try it out, please do so. This is part of the fun.

I have almost zero knowledge of electronics (plus lots of other stuff as well, still learning  ) when I started out in my quest but today, I think I can say I've come quite a long way in terms of knowledge and I enjoyed as much as I did with failures and successes.

Keep the faith.

Cheers, cp

[Farrah Day]

Just stuck my nose in to have a look.

Evil Roy Slade... unusual name... didn't your mother like the look of you? 

Now, surely a supposedly intelligent electronics software engineer (of 25 years), who 'knows a thing or two',  would at least be up to speed with the progress that has been made on replicating Meyers wfc's, before saying something stupid. Guess not!

With your qualifications you really should have had something constructive to say... else why even bother. We've all heard it a hundred times before.

Best then to leave us to waste our time... and you just stick to 'your' reality.

Best wishes, Farrah Day.

[hartiberlin]

@Evil Roy Slade
are you only here to put negativity into the forum ?

It was proven, that Stanley Meyer had an overunity process
running and could generate at least 5 to 10 times more HHO
gas than Faraday law predicts from normal electrolysis.

Lately user Ravi has acomplished the same.

I am here to hopefully provide some reality.

I have great respect for the people here who put so much time and effort into their work. However when I know it's in pursuit of a proven unattainable goal I feel obligated to say something. As an Electronics, Mechanical and Software Engineer (Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology) for 25 years I reckon I know a thing or two.

As administrator you can tell me to go away and I will, no problem for me.

Please direct me to the proof of Stanley Meyer's process from an independant source.
And perhaps the same for user Ravi.

I assume you have seen this: http://www.waterfuelcell.org/moreinfo.html

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z5afwEcZ3Ok


http://www.youtube.com/user/raviwfc