US Patent Office Has Granted Patents for Perpetuum Mobile

[pese]

Some nice magnet motors patents from my link collection.

somes was "forgotten?"

Magnet
http://www.ameslab.gov/final/News/2001rel/01magneticrefrig.htm   MAGNETIC REFRIGERATOR SUCCESSFULLY TESTED

http://amasci.com/elect/mcoils.html          Transformers          RIGHT ANGLE CIRCUITRY   Achtung - Die dort gennanten Schaltungen
sind zum Teil Dummheiten. Jedoch sehr interessant als "Kniffel"-Aufgabe
zum nachdenken.
-----------------------------------------<h2>
Patent DC Motor  Hp  with low amperages

http://www.google.com/patents?id=9NQiAAAAEBAJ

Magnetic tramsmission Magnet Gear
http://www.google.de/patents?id=qApMAAAAEBAJ&pg=PA2#PPA8,M1


http://www.google.com/patents?id=-64KAAAAEBAJ&dq=6,362,718  Motionless electromagnetic generator Stephen L. Patrick  LOOK THIS NOW  !!!!

http://www.google.de/patents?id=LREWAAAAEBAJ&dq=6867514  Permanent magnet motor Frank J. Fecera

http://www.google.de/patents?id=BkYxAAAAEBAJ&pg=PA1 Permanent   magnet motor Leonard C. Czerniak

http://www.google.de/patents?id=JSIGAAAAEBAJ&pg=PA1#PPA9,M1  Electric motor Barry Reginald Hobson et al   GIVE ATTENTION TI IT !! G.Pese

http://www.google.de/patents?id=3soIAAAAEBAJ&pg=PA1   Energy extracting mechanism having a magnetic spring Etsunori Fujita et al

http://www.google.de/patents?id=2UIvAAAAEBAJ&pg=PA1#PPA2,M1   Mechanic Energy storage and transmission apparatus Archie B. Gray

http://www.google.de/patents?id=Cc01AAAAEBAJ&pg=PA1#PPA1,M1   Electric motor with permanent magnets combined with electromagnets Carlos S. Garron

http://www.google.de/patents?id=hhg8AAAAEBAJ&dq=Carlos+S.+Garron   Electric motor having permanent magnets and resonant circuit Carlos Subieta Garron

http://www.google.de/patents?id=FmpXAAAAEBAJ&printsec=abstract&zoom=4&dq=Carlos+S.+Garron  Transformer in Combination with permanent Magnet




Oh Wonder , an lot of Ideas.


http://www.google.com/patents?id=bkBXAAAAEBAJ&pg=PA1#PPA3,M1   CURRENT RESPONSIVE ARRANGEMENT Inventor: Wemner- Kramer 1939

http://www.google.com/patents?id=jBRaAAAAEBAJ&pg=PP1#PPP1,M1    POWER CONVERTER CIRCUITS HAVING A HIGH FREQUENCY LINK Mc Murray

http://www.google.com/patents?id=bGU0AAAAEBAJ&pg=PA68#PPA68,M1    Electromagnetic generator Eduardo Villasenor de Rivas

http://www.google.com/patents?id=NuomAAAAEBAJ&pg=PA1#PPA5-IA2,M1  Single winding power converter John W. Luce
http://www.google.com/patents?vid=USPAT4683527                     -""-

<h2>SOURCE: Home: 
http://www.pese.cjb.net/liELECTRO.html 
www.pese.cjb.net

Gustav Pese

[Omnibus]

@shruggedatlas,

What do you think, will these organizations do the job:

http://www.pubpat.org/

http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/

Have you heard of them or of similar organizations? Do you think they may help in resolving the problem?

[gaby de wilde]

I doubt this one works either.

Who cares? You claim to have done a little digging, where is the long list of patents you found in the first 3 min? Why are we not discussing hundreds of patents?  I don't doubt you didn't look. I know for sure!

http://www.google.com/patents?id=-64KAAAAEBAJ&dq=6,362,718
Motionless electromagnetic generator

REFERENCES:
Patent Number   Title   Issue date
2153378   CURRENT RESPONSIVE ARRANGEMENT   Apr 1939
2892155   INPUT F   Jun 1959
3079535   VARIABLE STRENGTH PERMANENT MAGNETS   Feb 1963
3165723   MAGNETIC MEMORY DEVICE   Jan 1965
3228013   MAGNETIC MEMORY DEVICE   Jan 1966
3254268   PROTECTIVE SYSTEM FOR CAPACITANCE SERIALLY CONNECTED WITH INDUCTIVE APPARATUS   May 1966
3316514   FAIL SAFE ELECTRO-MAGNETIC LIFTING DEVICE WITH SAFETY-STOP MEANS   Apr 1967
3368141   SUBIETA-GARRON   Feb 1968
3391358   CIRCUIT BREAKER WITH IMPROVED MAGNETIC TRIP MEANS   Jul 1968
3453876   MAGNETOSTRICTIVE LOAD CELLS   Jul 1969
3517300   POWER CONVERTER CIRCUITS HAVING A HIGH FREQUENCY LINK   Jun 1970
3569947   MAGNETIC MEMORY DEVICE   Mar 1971
3599074   HIGH-POWER DIRECT-CURRENT TO SQUARE- WAVE CONVERTER UTILIZING AN INDUCTIVELY COUPLED GAS DISCHARGE TUBE   Aug 1971
4006401   Electromagnetic generator   Feb 1, 1977
4077001   Electromagnetic convertor with stationary variable-reluctance members   Feb 28, 1978
4366532   AC/DC or DC/AC Converter system with improved AC-line harmonic reduction   Dec 28, 1982
4482945   Transformer for low distortion rectifier system   Nov 13, 1984
4554524   Secondary circuit breaker for distribution transformer with indicator light switch mechanism   Nov 19, 1985
4853668   Integrated magnetic converter core   Aug 1, 1989
4864478   Integrated-magnetics power converter   Sep 5, 1989
4904926   Magnetic motion electrical generator   Feb 27, 1990
5011821   Method and apparatus for generating electricity   Apr 30, 1991
5221892   Flux compression transformer   Jun 22, 1993
5245521   Suppression of transformer capacitive current   Sep 14, 1993
5327015   Superconductor device to produce electrical impulses   Jul 5, 1994
5335163   Power supply circuit with integrated magnetic components   Aug 2, 1994
5694030   Magnetic element for power supply and DC-to-DC converter   Dec 2, 1997
Referenced by
Patent Number   Title   Issue date
7247337   Method and apparatus for microarray fabrication


Don Adsid has a nice page he says is from Geoff Engels Site


Bougon, G.H.     1859764     Magnetic Device     Permanent Magnet Motors     USA
Clover, L.W.    4025807    ELM Motor    Permanent Magnet Motors    USA
Ecklin, J.W.    3879622    Magnet Motion Converter    Permanent Magnet Motors    USA
Gay, H.    #2486327    P.M. Self-Movement Device    Permanent Magnet Motors    FRANCE
Jines, J.E.    3469130    Magnetic Motor    Permanent Magnet Motors    USA
Johnson, H.R.    4151431    Magnet Motor    Permanent Magnet Motors    USA
Kelly, D.A.    4082969    Magnetic Torque Converter    Permanent Magnet Motors    USA
Kelly, D.A.    4167684    Magnet Torque Multiplier    Permanent Magnet Motors    USA
Kelly, D.A.    4179633    Magnetic Wheel Drive    Permanent Magnet Motors    USA
Kiniski, Z.C.    3811058    Magnetic Motor    Permanent Magnet Motors    USA
Kinnison, R.W.    3899703    Magnet Motion Converter    Permanent Magnet Motors    USA
Kuroki, 5.    4305024    Magnetic Motor    Permanent Magnet Motors    USA
Powell, A.    1835721    Magnetic Motor    Permanent Magnet Motors    USA
Poysa, J.W.    1963213    Magnetic Motor    Permanent Magnet Motors    USA
Putt, J.W.    3992132    Energy Converter    Permanent Magnet Motors    USA
Scholin, H.W.    4011477    Magnet Motor    Permanent Magnet Motors    USA
Sheridan, F.R.    3609425    Magnet Motor    Permanent Magnet Motors    USA
Stahovic, R.F.    4207773    Magnetic Piston Motor    Permanent Magnet Motors    USA
Teal, B.R.    4024421    Magnetic Engine    Permanent Magnet Motors    USA
Teal, B.R.    4093880    Magnetic Engine    Permanent Magnet Motors    USA
Worthington, H.L.    1859643    Magnetic Motor    Permanent Magnet Motors    USA
http://www.theverylastpageoftheinternet.com/menu/patents.htm

One should feel free to try be a little more specific as one generalised opinion. I'm sure the inventors range over a width spectrum. One universal debunk doesn't do justice to any of it. It merely describes the author.

If you want a clear violation of scientific dogma you look at the hundreds and hundreds of electrolysis patents. Stan showed a working model, everyone knows this. No way in the world would he have gotten that patent if he didn't have anything to show. They are granted under Section 101, the contraption has been examined by US Patent Office".

It's just like the medical establishment having problems with moderating ships logs. Any reasonably good captain however will describe what ever happened. His log is not something one can question.

In that same way the scientific establishment may pretend the patent office has zero credibility. But 101 is 101! The man in dresses can chant their mantra all day. Still 101 is 101. Then Stan was forbidden to continue his research under the US national security act. Science doesn't trust that either I guess? I would love to hear the opinion of a forensic scientist on this topic.

Give me a break? No rational argument is going to repair this lie.

The patent database is much like the Internet, it's only much more complicated to navigate. But if you compare navigation with 1980 then you will have to conclude that your 5 min google searching would have cost you thousands of bucks back then, your query would continue to return results over a very long time span. If you take a few hours to seriously collect links and compare that to 1960 you will have the equivalent of an extremely slow and most expensive project. It would have cost an enormous heap of cash and it would have taken years to resolve the data. Meanwhile everyone on the Internet is acting like a 12 year old kid crying wolf over not getting things on a gold plate. You are just lazy, this proves it.

My own "found patent list" got kind of crufty when I started mixing application numbers though it. It's pretty sad to have just an application number, most of the time you really cant find anything with it. 1 in 50 or so you can find the patent or (even better) another similar patent mentioning the application.
So, I decided upon having them rather then not having them I just forgot it takes 100 times as long to validate as a patent number. So, yeah my page is a big mess sorry peoples, please have mercy... What is your excuse btw?

http://magnetmotor.go-here.nl/others/patents
patents - others - magnetmotor

http://magnetmotor.go-here.nl/others
others - magnetmotor

____
puh, it's probably just nothing, all of it, it has to be, it must, no no no it cant be anything noooooo I hate smurfs!!

[shruggedatlas]

@shruggedatlas,

What do you think, will these organizations do the job:

http://www.pubpat.org/

http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/

Have you heard of them or of similar organizations? Do you think they may help in resolving the problem?

I have not heard of them, but the pubpat.org organization seems particularly interesting.  It files for reexamination and then produces prior art to invalidate patents.  I found a brief overview of reexamination.  I have not been involved in reexamination, but only in litigation as a researcher, so I am not familiar with this process, but it appears to be a speedier option to litigation.  It was introduced in 1980, looks like.

http://www.baypatents.com/reexam.asp

I think you would still need prior art to invalidate the patent.  The PTO will probably not care that the idea cannot work, though I agree that this notion offends sensibility.

[Freenrg4me]

I think you are all right some of the time. It is a fact that US patents go through a national security review process. If they have any military value,or if the patent attorney has not done her job correctly, you lose your rights to the patent. They use what are called marching orders to steal it from you,put you under a secrecy order and the patent office tells you to go pound sand.

Meanwhile back at the ranch, the merchants of death produce your work or suppress your work by shelving it at the Carlyle Group for example. They may make a huge profit selling it to the pentagon that probably didn't even want it but the contract was awarded because the merchant of death gave a corrupt congressman 50K in an envelope and called it campaign finance.

I have an attorney in the family that does international patent law, and I have had to listen to the rant about the corruption. When it comes to the banking system or oil, it is considered vital national interests. That is code speak for "we will kill you if you mess with it or if we want it."

It is rarely in the national interest, it is in the interest of the entities that control the government. I live in the US and am not proud of that these days. Anyone that creates an OU device would be a fool to patent it. Name one person that actually created an OU device that either marketed it and made a profit or lived happily ever after. I does not happen and it is because of corruption.

If you want to profit from a "free energy" device, you had better do it quietly and remember the free part. You will only profit to the extent that everyone else does and it is because of corruption.

Money is worth nothing without oil, oil is worth nothing without fiat money and the military makes sure that they have a supply of oil.

The last stupid thing Saddam did was print his own money and demand payment in Iraqi Denar. The private corporation called the Federal Reserve ultimately run it all through their "Jewish Lobby" AKA the 4000 or so members of the CFR.

There are many organized crime syndicates in Washington DC and ultimately they depend on each other rather than compete. It is not the little guy at the patent office, it is the former executive from Phillips that runs that division that will make sure you don't sell your device or impede the Family business.

The US has always basically been run by around 200 families. Money, oil and death are family businesses.

So you are all right some of the time but Washington is corrupt all of the time. We do not live in a democracy and some of us are smart enough to realize that.

I personally plan retire by selling cookbooks to the poor that will eventually eat the rich. Technically, that makes me a merchant of death. javascript:void(0);
Grin