F.B.D.I.S.S.M - Flux.Boosted.Dual.Induction.Split.Spiral.Motor.

[Honk]

Question: Why only one magnet on the rotor?

You are wrong. I used 6 rotor magnets. Look closer at the pictures again.
And it did nothing more than consume even more power by the electromagnets.

Maybe the only reason why there is no OU rebuild is because no one tries it on a bigger
scale, d>1m or even greater, to have as many rotor magnets as possible.
Or am i wrong?

Yes, you are wrong again.
Size doesn't matter. It has been tried by the famous Paul Sprain. But it did not help him at all.
Magnetism is 100% conservative and physicists have been teaching us this lesson for 100 years.
It's time for us to start listening better as they are absolutely right about this.

[CompuTutor]

Probably here you will find the clue?
http://www.syscoil.org/medias/storages/user_3/wankel.pps

Some people might not have, or want to install Micro$haft's "Office" to see that.

it can be viewed online here:
http://www.viewdocsonline.com/
and exported as a PDF as well.

Hope that helps.

[Honk]

I have already read this document ages ago. 
And neither of the guys behind the info have ever built any working Magnetic Wankel.
I have read several other releases from this Ted Loder and Thomas Valone where they discuss
certain aspects and possibilities but so far that their theories are based an faulty perceptions.
The same goes for Mr Bearden and his Wankel attempts. It simply won't work. 

Btw, Terry Blanton has released some new and more detailed info on Paul Sprains Wankel story.
http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg46786.html

[Low-Q]

@Honk:
The problem is that we all know the trouth, but refuse to accept it, so we keep trying the impossible. However, even if the primary goal isn't met by all trials and errors, we do learn much about magnetism (and other stuff), and that experience will guide us to great ideas in other fields.

What you have learned with your project I'll bet is useful in other fields within the alternative energy category.
So you have achieved much more than many others have. You had a plan, you did that plan, and learned from it. While other people have their theories and claims about true working OU machines - but no working hardware - and those men will never experience progress. What you have done is great, even if it did not work. So 10 points to you

Vidar

[Honk]

Thank you very much for those warm words, Low-Q.

Yes, I have learnt a lot from this and it's useful both at work and for my hobbies.
I'm now able to see the deeper into the obscure but true nature of physics.