Selfrunning cold electricity circuit from Dr.Stiffler

[Joh70]

@xee: do you also have LEDs connected or just the neon bulb only? how long does it function? which circuit is the most efficient at the moment? is it Retrods?

@retrod: how long does your battery last, when you keep it running?

on the other side, a TV can be powered by a 1,5V Battery for a minute or so (seen somewhere on youtube.com). The question is not, what everything can be lit by a battery. The question is, do i get significant more AmpereHours out, than the same battery normaly can deliver? Or better: Is a circuit able to selfrun by its own power?

[DrStiffler]

@ALL

Sorry I have not been around for a few days. Have spent most of that time on getting everything right and simple for presenting my amplifier circuit version. I want graphs, parts and tuning instructions before I release it. I owe it to all that have been working so hard so long.

I am cleaning the audio on the YouTube video's I had removed, four of them are now back and another, maybe two, today. Have changed the series name to Spatial Energy Coherence or SEC. This may indeed be what is called Cold Electricity but I now want to distance my thoughts from that concept.

I'm not gone, have not given up and have some interesting things coming and will post some to YouTube and my site, I have moved away somewhat from the LEDs, I am now focused on excess Heat as it is more reliable to produce and enjoys HV burst which are common in most of these circuits.

For those interested do a Google on the peak frequency of atmospheric noise (~12Mhz range) and how it varies during the day @amigo this may be a partial answer to your observations.

Back soon....

[xee]

@Joh70,
Adding inductors as others have suggested increases efficiency and output voltage. Retrod circuit in my previous post is over 20% efficient with 9 volt battery for some resistive loads. Test was without LEDs. I do not plan to waste a battery to see how long it will run fluorescent bulb. The test was just to see if it would light a fluorescent bulb. Testing with fluorescent bulb might be better than testing with LEDs. But I do not know what is suppose to be happening so I only present it as an option. With added inductors and tweeking of emitter current I have been able to get up to 25% efficiency into some load resistances (this is still not a very efficient circuit).
If this is a double post I will remove. My first attempt did not seem to work.

[xee]

comments on efficiency:

A 9 volts battery at 100 mA is supplying 900 mW. My 15,000 mcd green LEDs light with only 0.18 mW (2.26 volts at 0.08 mA). Therefore a 9 volt battery at 100 mA should be able to light 900/0.18 = 5,000 LEDs if power is supplied with 100% efficiency. So why can't I just connect 5,000 LEDs in series across a 9 volt battery and have them light? Because LEDs require voltage to work. To light 5,000 LEDs in series with 2.26 volts per diode would require 11,300 volts. I suspect that this circuit's ability to increase voltage is being confused with ability to increase power.

This does not explain Dr. Stiffler's results. If his measurements are correct, then he is somehow getting more power out, not just more voltage out. The best efficiency I have been able to get with resistive loads is about 25%. He has been able to replace the resistive load with LEDs and get more power out of the circuit than is coming in. To do this the LEDs must be increasing the power the circuit is delivering to the load by over 400%. This is truly an amazing result.

EDIT: Please do not interpret this as not believing Dr. Stiffler's results. He has spent a lot of time and money trying to share a discovery with us and I appreciate his efforts. I intend to keep an open (but sceptical) mind.

[Freezer]

Scroll to 1:33:00 and this he looks like he's doing the same thing, using 1 wire.  Interesting video if you have time.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8377251139652777219&q=free+electricity&total=2393&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=0