Selfrunning cold electricity circuit from Dr.Stiffler

[armagdn03]

I was visiting his website a few days ago and found this graph, looked at it a while and now I think there is a contradiction.

First interesting choice of axis labeling, should the independant not be on the x axis? Are we to read that on the fourth point we have the highest power around frequency 0???

also

If we are basing the results off of the barium ferrite core resonanting at a frequency of 10Mhz, then why is it a linear growth on the graph, with no decernable change in characteristics floating around the 10Mhz resonant point? In fact the graph seems to cruise past 10Mhz without anything happening. From this I would think that the core maybe has less to do with this than we previously thought. If this were an effect due to the excitation of the barium ferrite I would assume the graph would look more like this....


the axis labels and units would be different of course, but you get the idea

(which I found typing "resonance graph" into google, and coincidentally the first site was on resonance of barrium products, lol, think god is pointing at something)

Instead what I think is happening is we are making the periods shorter and shorter as we increase the frequency. This crams more and more of the energy in to a capacitive coupling form of energy. This is consistent with teslas findings where he tried desperately to create shorter and shorter spark time lengths with magnets, blowers, flame, moving fluids.

Im not sure if he is using the sine wave output, but I have had more luck with abrupt shut off times comming from either pulse mode, or a rectified suqare wave mode (which saturates the primary a bit better). Short pulses mean more power extraction, and the more short pulses there are the more cycles we have to gain energy from, hence the high frequency.

[edork]

Hi

Great day today

Stifler put part 2 on his web site now maybe some eat their dog

www.stifflerscientific.com/ce4.asp

[starcruiser]

try a colpitts or maybe a blocking osc

[fritz]

Alternative Circuit:

->Important to use state of the art high efficiency leds.

Ground Setup:
No special grounding, groundwire connected to "house" ground -
all my equippement seen here is plugged into the same multiple
socket with grounding.

If I touch the hot end of the oscilloscope probe with my thumb,
(leaving the gnd of the probe unconnected)
you see the following:
->"Ground Finger" picture

Means the potential difference between oscilloscope(mains) ground
and my fingertip is 100Vpp. If I lift my right or left foot the voltage goes
down slightly - if I jump into the air - there is still lots of potential difference -
because my whole body is a capacitor.
(This is the point why birds can sit on high voltage wires - and humans cannot)
(The capacity of a bird to ground is very low - evolutionary ;-))darwin?)

I wont say that my ground is too bad - normal condition.
If I would use a grounded conductive table and a conductive grounding
carpet(like you have it in special labs) this picture would look different

Ok, first I check how many LEDs I can light
with my fingertip and a ground connection:
The audio analyser socket here is grounded, the analyze is turned off,
This analyser is very heavy, completly shielded and grounded - a good gnd.
First I tried one LED - but you can probably use up to 20 LED in series.
The current in such a case is controlled by the resistance of myself
to ambient ground. This resistance is very high - thats why "I" am acting
as current source. It doesn?t matter if you connect 1 - or  4 as in the
video - the brightness of the individual LED is the same (due to me as
current source)
-> "Ground Fingerx" Video

The interesting part is - who pays for this ground-ground electricity ?
My electricity counter isnt grounded ;-)))
Does it end up on the counter of some neighbour ?
This is of course not overunity - but maybe free energy (!!)

Anyway, grounding is an issue.

rgds.

[fritz]

Comments on Dr. Stifflers Part2 circuit:

What is not currently understood is why the addition of a capacitor in place of the LED reflects an increase of current through R2 ?
Thats simple, it decreases the inpedance of the overall circuit towards the generator.
This increases the current on R2.

I did a nice experiment with my generator:
I connected 2 green LEDs in series to a 5 Volt square output of my Generator:
The 2 LEDs are glimming very low. (because the 2*2.7Volts are barely reached)
If I separate the 2 Leds by 2 30cm long wires - the intensity is up to 10 times brighter.
Even if I connect the oscilloscope probe to the LEDs in series - there is an increase
in brightness.
Hmmm. The wire transforms the impedance, in this case the extra impedance from
the scope probe increases the voltage on the setup.
(normally, in DC you would expect the opposite)
well, thats rf,

rgds.