Selfrunning cold electricity circuit from Dr.Stiffler

[samedsoft]

The higher the voltage the better the interface (limits apply), note that as you increase voltage in an Exciter that the increase in input current moves in 'steps' it is in no way linear. Also note that if for example you have an input current of 40mA and the exciter appears to present excess energy and you detune but the input current remains at 40mA, but the apparent excess energy is gone.

@Dr. Stiffler und plengo

  I think there is an correlation between below discoveries to open the window to the lattice.

   Stanley Meyer has a choke yes, but he uses water as the medium.
   Steven Mark has a choke yes, but he uses toroid as the medium.
   Bedini SSG has a choke yes, but it needs permanent magnet system.
   Bearden's MEG has chokes yes, but it needs permanent magnet.
   SEC has a choke yes, it needs neon gas or lead acid battery as the medium (for now)

I beleive SEC circuit can be integrated with a special magnet to recover Back EMF from the lattice-magnetic wave medium.


Also we need to dig into Lead Acid battery system and understand why it is able to capture electrons from the choke? Can other electrochemical battery systems may increase the capturing effect?

Plengo can you draw a detailed circuit diagram with real values of the (BSP) Bedini-Stiffler-Plengo variation? Also can you dissolve some salt into the Lead Acid battery?

On the other hand, in order to prevent electrode erosion, we need to look at Tesla's wireless energy transfer system and John Kanzius's salt water RF system. That is We need to place a bulb full of pressurized gas between the AV plug antenna coupled system.   Did anybody understood the last sentence?

  Kind Regards,
  Nuri Temurlenk, Turkey
 

[nickle989]

@ The Dr.,Plengo and all

As I see it -

Energy Latice - Energy Transformation - Energy Equilibrium -

In many of the great minds, Hawkin's and the theoretical folks like him.  Have long
explored and talked about this universal energy source. Alot of us around the world,
by that I mean the out of the BOX folks, have been using this energy source for a
long time to get to achieve OU. Tom Beardin, Bendini and right close to us here
Dr. Stiffler.

Here are some thoughts and observations from my own little brain that have been squirreled
away from different moments in time.

For the longest time I have maintained and believed that the Universe will not allow
OU.  It will allow us though to transfer energy, as Dr. Stiffler put it so nicely the
energy lattice, from one medium to another, the SEC NEON to Heat.  But when we do this
transfer what is the cost of that energy to make the conversion, or where does this energy
go when a complete transfer does not occur, we call this effiecency rate.  It still remains
and is dispersed as heat, static electricity and other forms. Use a simple electrical motor
as an example.

Let's look at the Universe now, it is expanding but where does the energy come from if there
is not Overunity?  This is a large pondering question that many have theories about, here
is mine.

Black holes, I still do not believe in overunity as the Universe is always looking for
equilibrium.  Take a look at the quantum view of black-holes and how it could create energy
behind the lattice (thinking of a 2 dimensional plane). Black-holes take the energy appart that they
swallow and transport the energy back into the energy lattice or if you will fabric of space
and time.  This would be the KICK, as so many OU seekers call it, leading way new SUN's and
other energy particles.  The SEC in my humble opinion makes very good use of all of its energy
transformations.  One could even say that it has the ability to locate exact energy or bring
that energy to it from behind the lattice, I am almost to the point where this could lead to
the answer of what is gravity? not talking of the effects or the cause of gravity.


This could very well be, one of the greatest disoveries made thank's to Dr.Stiffler and folks that
influenced him.  I agree with your last post Dr. Stiffler, and wanted to expand on it.

@ samedsoft - I like your post ... it came while I was constructing this post

[retrod]

@All

Well I have the microscope view of the neon electrodes up on YT, its not the best because the scope was not meant for this type of exploration. I will be trying again when I change the light source so the electrodes will receive better inspection light. Anyway it does show some of what I was talking about and is interesting even though a bad video.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bRJ2GB_eF_Q

Dr Stiffler, the erosion and pock marks on the electrodes would lead one to think the 'missing' material is now the fuzzy looking material. I wonder if this change in the electrodes is contributing somehow to the generation of heat.

Dave

[forest]

*Removed by Dr. Stiffler*
Material has no meaning or value on this thread.

[forest]

*Removed by Dr. Stiffler*
Material has no meaning or value on this thread.