Selfrunning cold electricity circuit from Dr.Stiffler

[IsaSIO]

Hey Guys

the docs sight has opened up - well maybe a little bit open but i pulled some really good stuff from the older work it seems he has done on hho. some of the stuff is way out there but got a magnetic battery that looks kind of easy to build.

Larry.

[fritz]

@aether22

Maybe the spatial lattice model is a good working model
for those near field effects that are not tied down with the
usual impedances.

If it comes down to aether and and radiant energy, the name
doesnt matter as long as we just observe what happens.

rgds.

[AbbaRue]

I have finally got caught up in reading the posts of this thread.
Answered all my questions. 
I understand that the Barium Ferrite rod is now replaced with a 22 micro henry inductor,
connected directly from the collector to the AV plug.
And to get more power out we just use a larger size 22u inductor.
I was thrown off because some pictures showed a coil hanging off the board and others didn't.
And no explanation was given for it.  Now I know. 

One suggestion I have now is that we make a list of transistors that we know work.
Has anyone found a high current transistor that works? Say 10A or more?

Thanks for the help, I'll be doing testing now.

[aether22]

Peace !

If I believe in all the effects, outcome, whatever - replication -,
does it harm anyone if I try to discuss the origin of the effect -

No, it doesn't, I assumed you were trying to attack it.
I believe understanding the origin of the effect is by far the most important issue, so I'm sorry for misinterpreting your interest. (I have zero time for so-called skeptics, despite being initially skeptical of most things myself)

or is this just holy grail/radiant/whatever dogma.

Most assuredly not.
I have been investigating this weirdness for an inordinate amount of time with a great level of objectivity. (although to do this you must consider evidence the validity of which is not established by normal peer review but by it's individual and collective merits)

I have had zero interest in theories or dogma.

As far as I follow this thread its not clear if the "magic" happens
because of the SEC _OR_ the interaction with SEC or both.

The SEC both creates a condition and to at least some extent has feedback with it I believe.

It would be interesting what you think about my posting - thats
why I did it.

The fact that the calculation of the near field interaction is very
complex - its not proven that the stuff doesn?t follow very normal
principles.

I guess it depends on how far these complexities can be stretched, also is the energy out being in excess of what is deliberately put in not an indication of exceeding explanation under normal principles?

I would wonder who can answer these questions because there is debate about the nature of near and not so near fields, the crossed field antennas and similar come to mind, in some cases these antennas can transmit of the same frequency as another radio and not interfere with it, and pass through shielding.
Indeed every time I have tried to discount the hard to accept notion that fields can be pulled/projected I recall various different highly unconventional antenna types that can pull in strong signals through barriers, or the earth etc...

But getting back to the SEC I guess it really depends just where you stop calling something normal, especially when it is connected to a result that is not normal.

I guess what I am saying is that to really answer your question it must be made far more specific, however I would say I have no doubt that it has non-Maxwellian operation.

Why should the stuff you see (spatial matrix or whatever) not comply
with kind of standing wave/bubble interference of a near rf field.
Because its too complicated ?

The 'whatever' manipulates these fields and the results are not what would be expected even though there is still some resemblance to convention.

The 'whatever' is the medium of all matter and energy (this is not something I state lightly, but matter is literally made of it) and by exciting/manipulating it you can change the rules for matter and energy, one thing anyone in this field should be clear on is that these devices change the rules and you are as likely to get one 'impossibility' as you are to get 5.  (Anyone who has not realized that is in deep denial or has never applied reasoning to the field)

The outcome of my mail was that _I_ think
====
(this does not mean Im right
or I sell the truth or everything else is stupid -this means that im interested in
what you think)

I am very happy to share what I know and think, and I would not state that I 'think' the field effects of a SEC exceed conventional expectation in some way, rather I have no doubt whatsoever that in at least some ways to do.

But again if you want more than opinion or conviction we would need to get more specific.
Really though I need to get off this thread talking about SECs and instead having SECs. (excuse the pun)
Loki has promised an inductor which I am so extremely grateful for, but I'm finding it hard not to just jump in anyway and have my own kind of SECs.
But I should wait because otherwise I'll end up with my own version and that will cause problems sharing discoveries I make with my own version on this thread.

So Loki, if you are reading this, I'll pay for the faster/fastest shipping method Ok? (well within reason)

that the special properties of the SEC field/current (not the SEC field itself)

All 3 to an extent, of course magic is a bad term since it suggests lack of connection between things (to me anyway).
As can be seen in the expanding field around the water capacitor, space is effected. (and these disruptions can remain)
All elements (though some materials seem to be exempt) can become charged (spatially, meaning the space they entrain/drag), programed or changed (monoatomics forming).

Of course these are my views/knowledge, but Dr. Stiffler seems unlikely to give his apparently somewhat different (but not entirely dissimilar) views/knowledge so hopefully this can be considered acceptable that some framework can be provided, at least until some more experimental discoveries pop up which should be soon.

Real understanding is critical to getting anywhere as it is all that stops this from being magic.


BTW AbbaRue, I have not understood what you are talking about in your last 2 posts, are you sure the modifications you have mentioned have taken place or are you possibly misinterpreting something?

[fritz]

@aether22

Thanks for your comprehensive reply. (!!!)

What concerns the electrolysis - I think that
the effects between electrode(s) and water are linked
to the "chaos-locked"(jamming)- input - while the cell itself feedbacks
(not grounded) to the environment. (SEC field not involved inside water)
The thing on all this electrolysis cell is that at the point you start
electrolysis with dc,ac, pulsed you alter the "water" exactly at the moment
when the change happens (the water dipoles around arrange in a way to
reduce internal energy to minimum again - which stops the energy transfer)
- this is why people use pulse trains, switching
frequencies, to trick out this change -  optimizing energy transfer.
..., by using "chaos locked, coherent" "jamming" waveform -
you optimize the energy transfer in a very clever way.
(could do the same with locked sine oscillations maintaining a
travelling wave which forces circulation)

rgds.