Selfrunning cold electricity circuit from Dr.Stiffler

[hartiberlin]

DrStiffler is getting overunity after a few minutes now charging up his
3Farad cap with his new ultrawideband oscillator together with his Avramenko plug.

Have a look at the latest great video from him.

He  now has a great measurement system up there
with his spectrum analysator.

http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=MRH2O2&view=videos

Regards, Stefan.

[nievesoliveras]

@all
I had been having problems connecting to the forum, but the thing that was interfering just banished.

Thanks to everybody that in one way or another has helped me on this site.

Jesus

[DrStiffler]

@ALL

I have posted a circuit from one of the early ESEC circuits on my web site. This circuit weird as it may look was one of the first designs to show an energy gain in excess of the margin of error.

Anyone that does not have good test equipment and can not build it as shown, should not attempt it. If its not done correctly it will not work, simple as that.

I see in reading in this thread that someone thinks that reactive power is the answer and that the SEC Theory is incorrect, please explain how you envision this with my Exciters???

I have not returned here to play the game again, any qualified individual, here is something to work from that will be sufficient to prove the point.

Be fully aware that ESEC version #4 units are performing at 4x to 6x.

Dr.S.

[fritz]

@ALL
I see in reading in this thread that someone thinks that reactive power is the answer and that the SEC Theory is incorrect, please explain how you envision this with my Exciters???
Dr.S.

I think the scientific approach to this discussion would be to quantify the influence
of reactive power.
Due to the fact that the SEC Theory is an addon an not a replacement of traditional EE,
the observed results are influenced by  the SEC Theory _AND_ reactive power.

The quantification of reactive influence in "real world" might be very difficult to do because of the
highly complex load (from ground point of view) - an UWO has to offer.

A workaround for this problem could be a setup with an exciter in a faraday cage - placed
in the middle of nowhere using local ground.

The difference between the values in this setup - and in the "real world" setup
would give the chance to quantify both factors.

Thats good science.

This is no offend to your work and the SEC theory - but a plea for science,
experimenting, against black and white tinkering.

If it comes to 8.4V NimH accumulators discharged down to 2Volts - well....
thats astrology for me. From my experiments with "broken" accumulators
loaded with active, resonant circuits, well, everyone is invited to play around.



rgds.

[samedsoft]

I see in reading in this thread that someone thinks that reactive power is the answer and that the SEC Theory is incorrect, please explain how you envision this with my Exciters???

I have not returned here to play the game again, any qualified individual, here is something to work from that will be sufficient to prove the point.

Be fully aware that ESEC version #4 units are performing at 4x to 6x.

Dr.S.

Dear Doctor,

  Thanks for your kind reply on my suggestion. I admire your patience on us.

  My suggestion is to try to connect SEC theory with existing resonance, reactive power and harmonics theories. You have made thousands of experiments and you know nature of the system. Everybody should respect you and try to understand how you will change the world..

  Please send us #4 ESEC video and please mention your measurement method?

  We have professors on board and we are still trying to understand nature of SEC system.

  Nuri Temurlenk, Turkey
  www.erelgroup.com.tr