Selfrunning cold electricity circuit from Dr.Stiffler

[Bob Smith]

I think the bubbles might be explainable if we consider that the charge going on to the LED is not conventional electricity. If it is pure dieclectricity, this may be responsible for fracturing the water's molecular bonds - hence the bubbles.
Bob

[lancaIV]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luminescence

[F6FLT]

I think the bubbles might be explainable if we consider that the charge going on to the LED is not conventional electricity. If it is pure dieclectricity, this may be responsible for fracturing the water's molecular bonds - hence the bubbles.
Bob

Why invent new theories when conventional theories perfectly explain the effect while explaining many others?

[Bob Smith]

Conventional theories are theories. They are formulated within a prevailing EM theory paradigm.  No doubt bubbles on the electrodes can be explained from within the conventional EM paradigm and its prevailing theories.

Eric Dollard and Tom Brown showed resonance in RLC systems separating magnetism from dielectricity. The implications for this demonstration are far reaching. One of them is the fracturing of water. Think about Stan Meyer's work.


See:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6BnCUBKgnnc&t=1385s

[F6FLT]

Conventional theories are theories. They are formulated within a prevailing EM theory paradigm.  No doubt bubbles on the electrodes can be explained from within the conventional EM paradigm and its prevailing theories.

Eric Dollard and Tom Brown showed resonance in RLC systems separating magnetism from dielectricity. The implications for this demonstration are far reaching. One of them is the fracturing of water. Think about Stan Meyer's work.


See:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6BnCUBKgnnc&t=1385s

"Conventional theories are theories": yes, but you seem to have forgotten their framework. These are scientific theories, so:
- they are falsifiable (in the sense of Karl Popper)
- they have been verified by observations and measurements
- they are capable of quantified predictions of phenomena

Eric Dollard and Tom Brown didn't show anything at all like that.

- they present banal phenomena that can be explained perfectly with classical theories without introducing hypothetical longitudinal waves
- their theory does not predict anything new that would be different from what classical theories predict.

So their theory is useless, it's a pseudo-theory based on misinterpretation of facts.  Science is not done on youtube.