Selfrunning cold electricity circuit from Dr.Stiffler

[amigo]

@RStiffler

I'm still having a hard time with lighting anything more than one LED and even one does not shine as bright. I have modified my mock-up function generator to be able to fine tune the frequency, so with that I found another resonant frequency for me at 8.59MHz where the LED lights up but not as bright as at 10.07MHz. Still looking for the third resonant frequency but I'm afraid that without a real function generator I will not be able to get there.

So in the mean time I have built your oscillator from Fig: PL01 at the bottom of the page, figured let's see what kind of a wave it produces and at what frequency. Turns out on my scope it looks like a sawtooth slow rise sharp fall at around 6.96MHz.

What I'm wondering about is how did you make it so that it tunes to your exact resonant frequency, because I might as well use this circuit to tune mine in?

Thanks again.

[amigo]

@RStiffler,

Interestingly enough I have hooked up my hand held frequency counter to the PL01 circuit, and it shows ~7.179913MHz before the 400pf capacitor, and ~5.178899MHz after it.

So my fluke scope isn't as accurate as I'd hope since it missed by 220KHz, but that's beside the point, what bugs me is how come the frequency is below 10MHz and yet it is a best resonant one for that circuit?

[amigo]

@RStiffler

Alright, I'm lost now.

I got the PL01 circuit built (just the oscillator) and thought: I'll plug my core in and see what happens, worst case nothing does. Lo and behold the LED lights up pretty bright, so I plug in two more and the brightness diminishes but they are still lit.

Why is this happening, if the circuit was tuned to your cores and not mine? Is it because it appears to be auto-tuning into the resonant frequency for the circuit it is connected to?

It does not light the LEDs bright here and I cannot drive more than couple of, or they will not light up at all (tried 10 which was too many). I guess I'm still missing something...

Thanks!

[Branko]

Tesla's experiment from Colorado Spring has a problem with good grounding, and he put lot of water soaking to overcome it for make good ground point. If some HF oscillator was work on one side, this signal was going through this line hundred of meters (lot of device has build HF oscillator inside, HF lump for example). When he switch on his HF transformer, every nail was making spark, and in one experiment he burn out lot of standard Edison bulb, without wire, on around 10 m of distance.
If some HF source is near, it will actuate your device. You can see on my web:  http://free-ri.htnet.hr/Branko/02.html my investigation. I have receive energy in my house, but not when I go out. If some energy from inside of Earth exist (from thundering or something), it will be in less than diodes barrier signal form. Your coil can do Q=2PIf/R amplification, and overcome this diode-barrier problem.
Only with wire I have around 10 V in 5 minutes, and with 1 m2 plates I have 40 V, and good spark. Maybe transformer in my oven generate that energy, and it is only connect with one wire.
I think diodes without barriers (or mechanical rotating switching) will be important to receive that Earth energy.
I just want to help...
You need good grounding (and testing yours, which you use), and it must be only device which use it. Maybe some tree with nail inside, will be enough (just one of idea for nature grounding point). You can do it easy.

[DrStiffler]

@amigo

You might want to communicated with me direct in order to save bandwidth here and then you can present your findings. I now see a number of things in your circuit that can be causing a problem. I will state a few here.

1) In a coil the things to consider are Inductance (L), Impedance (Z), Inductive Reactance (Xc), and any mutual inductance. In your circuit L1 is wrong. It may very well have an L similar to my specification but the physical structure is all wrong. The Xc must be much higher than what I use. You are so close, finish by doing a good L1.

2) You show three LEDS, what happens when you add a fourth and fifth?

3) Your oscillator PL01. This is of Colpitts design and two things again determine frequency, the coil in the collector and the two caps, from collector to emitter and emitter to ground. If the L is large in order to be the major determinate of frequency then the C's will be rather small and any temperature or parasitic capacity will change the frequency and the oscillator may become unstable.

4) Because the two caps in the oscillator are part of the equation to set the frequency, also the coupling cap and the capacity of the MSOFET are in parallel with these components. You may have to figure if you need to reduce the value of the coupling cap. Use 1/(2*pi*f*C) to get reactance. I would not want much more than Xc=100.