Selfrunning cold electricity circuit from Dr.Stiffler

[DrZLowe7]

This one!

Yes! Now I understand. In reality about all I hope to gain out of all this is to be able to publish a paper 'Spatial Energy Coherence' which is indeed my view of what is going on here. If I can in some way get people to stop jumping on me as some kook, when it all is resolved I just may be able to find someone that will publish  'SEC'

Very, very simply put, the interface is capacitive and all matter is surrounded by unlimited amounts of energy in different forms. With a proper interface some of this energy can be cohered.

Maybe as time goes on I may add to this, but would prefer to leave it for a paper, and by that time I could be shown to be wrong in my view. Time and additional duplications will I hope clear it up one way or another.

Sorry I did not understand at first and do wish you would have respected the Copyrights......

The schematic that was posted I got from this forum. Not your web site and sent it in a private email that got posted. I was not copying direct information from your site and I did not know at that time the information was copyrighted. As I never seen an copywright discloser on the schematic or should I say picture. Sorry again. If there was a discloser sorry I did not notice it.

Copyright (c) 2007 Stiffler Scientific. All rights reserved.
Copying of this material is strictly forbidden.
Violation of these Copyrights will be enforced.

Don't know how much clearer this can be?

I just said I never noticed it. And said I was Sorry for not. The schematic was only resent to person who posted it. It is your sarcastic replies that ticked me of at you in first place. Can you not just take an I am sorry. Resending copyrighted material back to original sender is not in violation of the law. I am tyring to apologize . And make up.

By all means you apology is accepted. Strange though as it turns out I was not even referring to you on this issue, it was the image of SEC that AM posted. So you must have got it confused and I followed.

**It is your sarcastic replies
I treat how I'm treated. Respect get respect does it not, yet who starts first?

OK I am sorry again. We keep getting our wires crossed. No pun intended. However I thought you were replying to me as I was quoted. Buy the way the schematic I was referring to is posted on posting page 36. I just thought you were commenting to me. After my groveling and apologizing the statement I though was a rude reply. Again Sorry, Sorry. I will not be bothering you anymore. As I kind of had a vendetta against you I jess I just get irritated to easy. Good luck with your research I wish you the best.

[utilitarian]

I think I am a late to this party, and maybe someone already mentioned this, but why bother with 50 LED?  Just use 1 LED and plug the rest of the output into the input, and then you will know for sure if it is overunity or not.  "How?" you may ask.  Well, if the light never goes off, then you have overunity.  On the other hand, if at somepoint in the experiment the LED goes off, i.e. there is no more "juice", as electricians call it, then the device is probably not overunity.

I am not an electical engineer or even an electrician, but that seems like a good next move, so that people would quit quarreling over the overunity thing.

[amigo]

My gosh seven pages of postings in one day, you all have really outdone yourself, and it's nice to see doc stiffler is back as well.

Sadly after reading all seven pages, it seems that we still want to crawl on all four instead of soar high above. And should I even mention the one liner posts from the village idiot who chimes in from time to time in an attempt of disrupting any meaningful conversation.

These are not judgments, just my honest observations, I'm entitled to my own opinion, no?

In any case, the whole argument appears to now be gravitating around O/U or no O/U in SEC circuit because we are back to the silly game of adding and deducting numbers. To be honest, the term O/U should be outlawed altogether because it's grounded in the old ways of closed-loop thinking, but how do you do that on a site that's called Overunity.

It is clearly evident that very few people are really interested in dropping the "old ways" in favour of something radically new. You cling to the old education and experience and it's as sad as Edison clinging to the DC power grid system at the overwhelming superiority of the AC. Ironically though, Tesla himself dropped the AC in favour of pulsed DC - now how's that for a twist. Perhaps something happens here, too (but I'm not holding my breath).

What we need is more women in here because they will bring the intuition - something that many men apparently lack, or are unwilling (too proud or plain dumb and ignorant) to explore/utilize.

Fire at will...

[derricka]

@ Dr Stiffler
In the hopes of fostering reproducibility, I have created a printed circuit board artwork file based on your Thomas Oscillator circuit.  With your approval, I would like to release the file to members of this forum, preferably, from your web site. I will be happy to mark the design with any copyright information you think is appropriate. I have already marked it for "non commercial use only"  Just let me know if, and where to send the file. 
This PCB file could be emailed to one of many On-Line board fabricators like www.expresspcb.com, or for people who like to make their own, the file can be laser printed onto special ink jet paper, and ironed directly onto a copper clad board. Also, the design is not set in stone, so based on inputs from yourself and forum members, I will be willing to make various edits and changes as time permits.

[utilitarian]

It is clearly evident that very few people are really interested in dropping the "old ways" in favour of something radically new. You cling to the old education and experience and it's as sad as Edison clinging to the DC power grid system at the overwhelming superiority of the AC. Ironically though, Tesla himself dropped the AC in favour of pulsed DC - now how's that for a twist. Perhaps something happens here, too (but I'm not holding my breath).

What we need is more women in here because they will bring the intuition - something that many men apparently lack, or are unwilling (too proud or plain dumb and ignorant) to explore/utilize.

Fire at will...

Well if you want more women, Stefan will have to offer more diverse shopping.  Right now it's just magnet toys and stuff.  From my experience with women, they are not interested in that.

But back to what you said, could you elaborate on the "radically new" part?  What do you propose?