Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Working Attraction Magnet Motor on Youtube!?

Started by ken_nyus, October 15, 2007, 10:08:47 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 7 Guests are viewing this topic.

Heynow

Hi

I am new here and I joined up specifically because this thread.  I have a firm belief that a magnetic motor is possible, but I don't think it will be easy to make.  Imagine trying to make a lawnmower engine from scratch in your basement!

My observations about the motor are that this is closing the loop on a SMOT.  So if it needs a little kick-start, thats OK (?).  Also, isn't the idea that the machine needs to build a little momentum to get past the sticky point.  It seems that the mount for the magnets provides some shielding?  It looks like it is two pieces of material.

I know some of these points have been made already.

Peter

Bruce_TPU

Quote from: klicUK on October 21, 2007, 07:09:51 PM
I've posted another replication attempt on YouTube

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rA3pGixr5rc

still no luck I'm affraid.


@ klicUK

A good attempt on the replication.  ;)  But, it still appears perfectly horizontal and is neither tilted nor off center on the base (this would act to increase the tilt.)  Please compare your picture again to that of the original.  Without gravity assist, this stands no chance of working.

It is the "unbalanced wheel" of the lead out theory that makes this possible.  Please reattempt, putting  the cylinder at a "slight" tilt, with the magnets at the "bottom" of that tilt. 

If you look at the photo of the original, you will also notice that it is "off set" from the center of the base.  This would add additional tilt to the unit.  A little geomotry off of the original photo, and you should get pretty close.

Until someone has replicated "exactly" they can not say that it does not work.  It simply does not work the way they have built it.

Keep pluggin' away, your doing a good job,   :)
Bruce 
1.  Lindsay's Stack TPU Posted Picture.  All Wound CCW  Collectors three turns and HORIZONTAL, not vertical.

2.  3 Tube amps, sending three frequency's, each having two signals, one in-phase & one inverted 180 deg, opposing signals in each collector (via control wires). 

3.  Collector is Magnetic Loop Antenna, made of lamp chord wire, wound flat.  Inside loop is antenna, outside loop is for output.  First collector is tuned via tuned tank, to the fundamental.  Second collector is tuned tank to the second harmonic (component).  Third collector is tuned tank to the third harmonic (component)  Frequency is determined by taking the circumference frequency, reducing the size by .88 inches.  Divide this frequency by 1000, and you have your second harmonic.  Divide this by 2 and you have your fundamental.  Multiply that by 3 and you have your third harmonic component.  Tune the collectors to each of these.  Input the fundamental and two modulation frequencies, made to create replicas of the fundamental, second harmonic and the third.

4.  The three frequency's circulating in the collectors, both in phase and inverted, begin to create hundreds of thousands of created frequency's, via intermodulation, that subtract to the fundamental and its harmonics.  This is called "Catalyst".

5.  The three AC PURE sine signals, travel through the amplification stage, Nonlinear, producing the second harmonic and third.  (distortion)

6.  These signals then travel the control coils, are rectified by a full wave bridge, and then sent into the output outer loop as all positive pulsed DC.  This then becomes the output and "collects" the current.

P.S.  The Kicks are harmonic distortion with passive intermodulation.  Can't see it without a spectrum analyzer, normally unless trained to see it on a scope.

psychopath

Quote from: Heynow on October 21, 2007, 08:18:34 PM
Hi

I am new here and I joined up specifically because this thread.  I have a firm belief that a magnetic motor is possible, but I don't think it will be easy to make.  Imagine trying to make a lawnmower engine from scratch in your basement!

My observations about the motor are that this is closing the loop on a SMOT.  So if it needs a little kick-start, thats OK (?).  Also, isn't the idea that the machine needs to build a little momentum to get past the sticky point.  It seems that the mount for the magnets provides some shielding?  It looks like it is two pieces of material.

I know some of these points have been made already.

Peter

Firstly, I still fail to see why people think this works like a smot. It doesn't. It doesn't drop out of a sticky point with the help of gravity.

Secondly, I believe overunity will come out of someone's garage. The first lawnmower engines were probably very simple. Also, since mainstream science acts a little like close minded religious fanatics, it is unlikely they will come up with anything.

Most importantly, the most universal, significant things in nature are usually very simple. Take Einstein for example, he came up with E=mc^2. Now how difficult is E=mc^2 to understand? It's simple! How hard is it to build a betatron? Not hard at all! You could use the parts from your television to make it. Did you know that MIchio Kaku made his betatron before he left high school?

So if overunity is possible, then an inventor could build one if it's an efficient design, with all the extras removed. Of course if overunity needs extreme amounts of power then it would be hard, but still, it would be SIMPLE.

PS By the way, the momentum gained from magnetic tracks such as v tracks, is not enough to get it past the sticky spot. If you have a steel ball which is attracted to a magnet, and rolls towards it on a track with the magnet beside the track, the ball doesn't come to a dead stop when it reaches the magnet. It keeps going, for a bit. I believe this is how the smot works, since the moment it goes past the magnet, it is in the air, and drops.

PPS Couldn't this have been very easily faked? Since he is using a hard disk, hard disks have motors! This reminds me of that video where the kid put his device on a computer fan, very oviously powered by the fan.

HLEV

Quote
PPS Couldn't this have been very easily faked? Since he is using a hard disk, hard disks have motors! This reminds me of that video where the kid put his device on a computer fan, very oviously powered by the fan.

After taking apart several hard drives myself, I have been thinking that this would have been easy to fake by running some hair thin magnet wire from the HD controller board, which you would hide out of sight, to a switch and then into the base of the motor.  Magnet wire would never show up in a grainy video.  Also you only really see one hand in the frame of the demo.  The other hand cold be pulsing the switch to simulate the movement. 

I want to be clear that this is just my theory of how it could be faked,  I am in no way saying that Xpenzif faked this in any way.  For now I am a believer and I am working hard on my own replication.

HL 

Omnibus

Quote from: klicUK on October 21, 2007, 07:09:51 PM
I've posted another replication attempt on YouTube

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rA3pGixr5rc

still no luck I'm affraid.

@klicUK,

This is the direction to go when attempting to replicate the device. Good job and presentation. However, in addition to what @btentzer says I?d add that the screws you use do not seem to be of the same kind @xpenzif has used. Also, from @xpenzif?s video is seen that he doesn?t push the rotor to spin as you do but is slightly moving it to allow it to self-start. As seen from @zpenzif?s video the motor doesn?t work by just approaching the magnets to the rotor--motor spins properly only in one of the basically three attempts with some particular disposition of the magnets with respect to the drum. There?s more to it than just the physical appearance and shapes of the motor parts. Don?t forget that it?s the interaction with magnetic fields that is at play here, fields which are not seen with a naked eye. It?s this interaction of the fields that has to be reproduced, not just the shapes of the given parts of the machine.