OverUnity Question

[Arlo#1]

The universe is ever expanding, and the universe is full of energy.  So is that not overunity? Just my 2 cents

[z.monkey]

Hahhahhahaaahahaaaahhaaa....

I am positively stupefied over the confusion of basic physics laws here.  Linda and Hans are right, and that is probably because they have a background in science and physics, and have tested the theories and laws countless times.  People assume that free energy and over unity are some sort of magic.  "Well, I'll just wind up this magic coil and it will unlock all the secrets of the whole universe."  That is a dump truck full, completely full, of bullshit.  Yeah, I'm from Texas.

Free energy and overunity have to conform to all the same laws that all the other normal energy devices conform to.  The difference being that there are sources of energy that are not completely understood by our limited intellect.  What if I said we could poke a hole in the ground and a gas would come up from the depths of the Earth.  We could use this gas to cook food, and warm our houses, and generate electricity.  Does this seem irrational?  Does this seem feasible?  Is this free energy?  No this is not "free" energy, it is natural gas, and it's pretty close to free.  But we have to pay someone to poke a hole in the ground.  We have to pay someone to lay pipes to our houses.  We have to pay someone to build a gas turbine electrical generator.  We have to pay someone to run electrical wires to our houses.  So, even though the resource may be close to free, we still have to pay for the service to get the energy to our lazy asses.

OK, suppose someone finally figures out how to tap zero point energy.  "Free" energy from the electromagnetic null zone.  Do you suppose that this brilliant scientist who built this exotic technology to extract energy from the vacuum of space will give you his invention for free?  Suppose this scientist invested twenty years of his life working on this technology, the whole while living on a shoestring budget.  So how much money do you think that he would want to sell his zero point machine for?  I would suppose that this zero point machine will be rather expensive.  He would be reluctant even to sell such a machine to the lazy couch potato populous we have in the modern world. 

Free energy is cheap, the devices that produce free energy are NOT!

As for you that don't understand this, you need to go back to school and major in the HARD sciences.  Without the fundamental understanding that science, math, and physics provide it is going to very difficult to invent anything that will be useful to mankind.

I like to look at this whole mess of free energy and over unity in terms of efficiency.  A system with no resistive or frictional losses is 100% efficient (a very rare occurrence).  Free energy and over unity imply that a system can be more than 100% efficient.  You can be sure if a system is more that 100% efficient that it is gaining energy from an unknown source.  What we are all looking for is that unknown source of energy that causes a system to be inexplicably more than 100% efficient, if, indeed, that can happen.  Then once we identify the unknown source of energy then we will adjust our perceptions of the universe and realize that the system is operating at less that 100% efficiency in light of our new discovery.

Hope you don't mind my ranting...

Fundamentals, people, fundamentals!

Blessed Be Brothers...

[Koen1]

so you're telling me that the device i have that takes in 5.38 volts dc at .51 amps dc 2.7438 watts "power" and i am getting out 4.71 volts DC .91 amps dc out is not overunity?

so i am putting in 2.7438 "watts power"
and getting out    4.2861 "watts power"

You're still talking about energy and not about "power", but never mind that

What I want to know is: can you please post this device,
of which you claim that it outputs more energy than is put in?
I, and I think some others as well, would like to see and measure
that input/output ratio for myself...

Thanks!

Kind regards,
Koen

[helmut]

so you're telling me that the device i have that takes in 5.38 volts dc at .51 amps dc 2.7438 watts "power" and i am getting out 4.71 volts DC .91 amps dc out is not overunity?

so i am putting in 2.7438 "watts power"
and getting out    4.2861 "watts power"

You're still talking about energy and not about "power", but never mind that

What I want to know is: can you please post this device,
of which you claim that it outputs more energy than is put in?
I, and I think some others as well, would like to see and measure
that input/output ratio for myself...

Thanks!

Kind regards,
Koen

Yes: Koen1 is right
Thats,what we all looking for.

@Spewing

Please be so kind and post your Setup.
Than we will have a new Objekt to be rebuild.
During the Time many inventors came and claim their OU Devises.
We have seen many Patents,that state somehow power multiplikation.

So here ist the right place to start and  " save the World."
Our Politicians just talking all Day to do efficiant steps forward while they
consume more and more the money,that we are working for.

We search and wait for a device,that collect us some energy out of the unknown
aether.
If it is just :1.5423 watts power    thats fine.

helmut

[Feynman]

A solar cell puts out more power than it consumes.

You need to rigorously define the question before you will find an answer.