Nathan Stubblefield Earth battery/Self Generating Induction Coil Replications

[t3t4]

I like this, so I'm going to start in the middle and work forwards and backwards from this point.

@ t3t4

How do you do it? I have tried this many times because others have reported similar results to yours. But every time I try this I only get millivolts. Not even enough to rectify with a diode. Please note, I do not doubt your results. I am just frustrated I can not get similar results. Thank you for sharing your results.

@xee2

I do this perhaps by location, so the more that try, the more we can rule this theory out. But mostly I do this by perseverance and determination. I want it bad enough and won't let it go until I reach my objective. Or until I reach a point of diminishing return. There is no payday for the time I have already spent on this, but the many amazement's along the way as well as the smiles or smirks, that right there makes this endeavor more then worth the hardship. At least for me they do.

Thank you,
t3t4

[t3t4]

Greetings,

@jeanna specifically.

I will do my best here to focus just on you. I know I have mentioned many things to many people, mostly non-specific. I will do my best here to just speak to you.

It sounds from what I read in your post, that you know what your doing. All I can suggest to you, is always keep an open mind. By doing so we all benefit. Be careful of what you read. The human mind is very impressionable! Test and prove, that's what science is all about and is exactly what I have read from you thus far. Good job!

In regards to the scope you are using, I apologize, I did not mean any offense. I did not know it was analog based since I could not see the model number. But from what you and others have reported, my opinion is this: You don't have enough resolution with that scope. If you are digital in any way, then you should be in the GHZ range to get proper reading in the MHZ range. Rule of thumb for scopes, shoot for 5 time more then the sample you want to capture, if not more.

My scope is a TEK 2235 which is a 100 MHZ unit. It's nothing special, but it is analog, almost purely. But still not enough for the tests I'd like to perform. I too need to be in the GHZ range, but this you won't find by analog means let alone at a reasonable price. So we use what we use, plain and simple.

Thanks for the confirmation on the frequency. You are the first in 2 weeks of asking!

I agree, but resonance with what?
I think we should be aiming to resonate with what is naturally occurring.
Why would we aim for something a rumor told us?
I see 2.22-2,5MHz from a single wave every time.

My thoughts here are basic, nothing more. I have been working on this for a long time now and I still do not know! But I'm thinking in terms of the Tesla coil. So resonate with what? Another coil, or another body?

My best guess, these coils should resonate with two terrestrial bodies. But which two? I think the earth and the sun would be a firm place to start. Given all space in the region, we (earth/sun) are the two closest bodies. So why not use that to our advantage? We already know that both exhibit severe magnetic fields, right? So as I mentioned in one of my first posts, run a magnet along a copper wire and you induce an electron flow. The planets seem to work as magnets to me. I am drawn to them by means of theory, but they or something else return the favor in terms of energy. My bet is the planets/stars out there is where the bulk of this energy comes from. I see it all as spinning magnets. If this is true, then there truly is endless power at our finger tips. We then just have to reach for it!

What I do know is this: Drop a coin into a pond, the point of impact creates a splash, but at the same time a ripple is also created. This ripple is small at the point of impact, but grows in accordance to the size of the pond. The further away from the point of impact, the slower the waves become. Yes? You can see this in your mind, right? Well, then spread this out over the entire surface of the world. That's one gargantuan pond! But the further the wave traves, the more is slows. It does this because the wave is expanding in all directions. The further you go, the weaker and slow the wave. How much energy can you expect from a coin? It only has just so much mass, it can only displace just so much water. The energy displaced wears out over surface area. Hens the ripple in the pond.

But what if you had multiple coins and multiple ponds? What if you dropped one coin in one pond every millisecond of every day? Could you get a consistent frequency from an event such as this? Now, imagine the earth is just a pond, but it's being hit with magnetic coins or pulses from  all over the world. Can you imagine the ripple this creates? The problem is: you have to remember the coin in the pond scenario. The ripple is small at the point of impact. What this wave turnes into over the surface of the planet is something else entirely. Hens, the 6 HZ theory. This is also known as the woodpecker something or other, or constant heart beat of the planet. It's real, you just have to test in the correct way to see it.

Have you used coils? You are using a cap. Why not add a coil? Don't you want AC?

I do use coils, that is where I began this project. but unless you have at least one coil resonating with something, you equal nothing in the end! No, I do not wan't AC. I say this because any store bought equipment cannot function on 5 MHZ let alone 6 HZ AC. That would all be useless to us unless we can capture the energy and store it for a later time. We need batteries or resonance and then a converter in either case to make this system work for us using modern day equipment. Everything we buy is either powered DC or AC. If it's AC, then it either runs on 50 HZ or 60 HZ. If it's DC, the frequency does not matter since the energy is simply stored. Even power supplies store the energy before they feed it to you. There simply is no way around this fact as of yet!

I choose to store and use, not to use directly, since nothing we currently own can run on this power from the sky or from the ground. It's all a convergence of energy, but where to put it? I dump it into batteries for later use, but that's just me. Yes you can run LED's from this, but you guys/gals are already doing that. But is this real work? It's real light, sure, but is it doing work for you or is it just providing an illuminating service?

Yeah, that's a thine line, I'm not about to cross it. But it is something I ponder at times.

So far any time I add a diode anywhere in any direction it kills it. dead.
nothing . as soon as I go inside the diode I can detect something.
Right now I have a capacitor connected to the earth  south probe and it is collecting 0.065v egads,. not much!

Are you sure you are not getting a bleed through from your electricity line?

I/we can never be sure that we are not inducing at least something from the electric company! But since they won't quite, neither will I... Can't honestly say that I'm too proud to steal from them. I certainly know how to do it, but that is not what this experiment is about. So you'll have to take my word that I'm being honest and thorough with my tests. But in all honesty, unless we eliminate the electric company in all areas, how could we ever know for sure this energy is just from the earth and not one of the earths industrial facilities?

Just food for thought....

Quote

    ...probe to my head in the temple Region. .. But I'm sure you will see that you are emitting the same basic pattern as the earth.

I did that on the first day I had my scope,  and that is how I was sure my scope functioned. I agree it is heartbeat-like, but ony when I have the 2 NS (Nathan Stubblefield) coils attached. Using only one gets a less complicated wave at 2.2-2.5 Mhz not 5 MHz.

I'm not using coils when performing this test. This may be the difference in resolution between our two scopes. But I perform this test un-grounded using the positive probe only. I find this interesting, maybe you will too. Just take the positive tip of the probe and touch your head. I prefer the temple region, but anywhere seems to work. Take a base reading while watching the screen, then, think about something and note the difference. If you think hard enough, you can get a reading of 1 volt or more.... Your thoughts can change the wave form as well as voltage. A little bit of concentration is all that is required for this test.

But in a relaxed state, we humans look the same to a scope as the planet earth, at least on my scope we do. I find this infinitely fascinating. As I'm sure you and everyone else knows already, never touch the probes while testing, it screws up all readings because the human body induces voltage into whatever it touches. So always stay insulated while testing anything.

Ok, that's enough for now.

Good night everyone.

t3t4

[protonmom]

Jeanna
Thank you for giving me that shopping list.
I have not yet placed my order but plan to, soon.  I am also interested in the scope.  I am not sure which scope to get so could use some help here in which scope is the best.
Digital vs. Analog?  Ghz???
Also, has anyone used the scope in a deep hole yet?  Would it make any difference?

[the_big_m_in_ok]

kukulcangod said:

Hey guys
I need help here , recently I  traveled to a location where I was able to prove that the aerial/antenna set up from Tesla gives out energy, thing is ......
...but then again I am just getting a couple of volts from the joule thief, how do we get a small electric  motor to run from it and the earth battery?
...anyway take a look at this please :

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qd2mSkQ_uog

I looked at the video and saw the output readings.
I'd say:
1) The narrator is in a fairly large city in Latin America(by his accent) or Spain with 50/60 Hz power everywhere.  This would affect his reading to some extent, I think.  He's getting part of his output from somewhere, right?  Lot's of watts available in the house wiring.
2) The tower looks to be about 50' high on the roof, with another 20-25' to the copper pipe beaten into the ground.  He says he gets 85-120 V @ 1-3 milliamps.
This looks a lot like electret static electricity to me.  He needs several hundred feet and a spark plug to a HV transformer to obtain useful power output.

Otherwise, it's a really simple setup.  Anyone can do it.  I have a small digital VOM, 200 feet of 28-30 Ga. Radio Shack magnet wire, and a stiff piece of steel from a busted windshield wiper blade for a ground connection.

I'll start looking into places like hilltops here in San Francisco to run my own test(s).

--Lee

[IotaYodi]

I myself have been looking at these 2 units. If someone sees something better let me know.

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=360144935966&ssPageName=STRK:MEWAX:IT
50MHZ 3 year warranty. Sample rate is 1 GSa/s (Single Channel), 500 MSa/s (Dual Channels)
This is strictly an AC benchtop and not portable. Just about $400. Cheapest price Ive seen on the net for this unit as its straight from the overseas manufacturer.


http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=170361338511&ssPageName=STRK:MEWAX:IT
25 mhz 3 year warranty. It can be made portable as well as AC. $320   Sample rate is 100MS/s

Given the price difference plus a big difference in bandwidth and sample rate as well as rise time, The 50MHZ seems a much better deal. You lose the portability but I have a portable generator, so if need be I could use that. As it stands my bench is in the garage and the eb setup is right outside on the same wall. So I can have mine hooked up constantly. The 50 Mhz would also give you an edge if doing higher frequency's for other projects.