Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Nathan Stubblefield Earth battery/Self Generating Induction Coil Replications

Started by Localjoe, October 19, 2007, 02:42:39 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 82 Guests are viewing this topic.

t3t4

@ dllabarre,

Nice diagram, but the pic's of your set up along with explanation is what gave me an idea. For years now I have been trying to figure out how Tesla could have created a vibrating/resonant power supply that actually has enough power to run a car, without touching ground! After-all, it's not like you can simply drag a ball and chain behind you when you drive, right? So if you pull the energy from the air, how do you send it to ground without actually touching ground, all the while being mobile? It could be done exactly the way you show in your pic's, if tuned. One plate can be positive and the other negative. I just never thought about that way before, so thank you!

@ protonmom,

QuoteI guess it is Back to NS EB for me then.

I am sorry you do not have the patience for science. But do please continue to read at your leisure. The pic's I have already provided (via download) are of a working system or product! But I apologize that I have yet to provide these pictures in accordance with everyone's preference. But no, I do not have pics of where I ended! I believe I think logically, but I do not always "do" logically. I'm not a secretary, so I don't keep records laying around. All of this is just an experiment and is something I do for leisure, to relax and have fun with, "not" to document every little thing.

I'm sorry, but I'm just not made that way. I hope you understand. Give me some time please,,,,, I'll get some pic's up someway, somehow.

t3t4

jeanna

t3t4,
I am glad to have helped.

Please understand something.
We are all different and we all have wonderful ideas and many many things we want to try.
But they differ from each other.
So, you might find that even though you believe that your direction is the most sensible and truly the only obvious direction to take, others only want to look and watch.
Since they are full of their ideas, they do not have any more extra time to look at and read other people's ideas than you do.

It will probably help you get your ideas across faster and better if you make it really easy. And, that might make it more difficult for you.
On the other hand, I have found that when I was forced to explain myself again just to get any response, I found that the process helped me a lot. So, even though it is more work, it may in the end benefit you as well. (it may not, of course.)

Most of us are here for scientific reasons.

Anyone who has read both earth battery threads AND the joule thief thread in their entirety is a very sincere researcher (or completely crazy  ;D )
Protonmom did not even notify us of her presence here until after she had read both earth battery threads entirely and I think twice at that time. Not only that, she had already made a Stubblefield generator. I am very impressed with this approach and I suggest you might acknowledge the effort. But, that is up to you.

I will soon go to those sites you linked to see if I can view them or if I must download them. I prefer viewing them. Photobucket is where stprue used to post very large pics.

thank you,

jeanna

xee2

@ protonmom

Just to give you something until t3t4 posts his reduced pictures, here is his photo of the basic circuit. He has already posted a diagram for this circuit.

t3t4

@ jeanna,

QuoteWe are all different and we all have wonderful ideas and many many things we want to try.
But they differ from each other.

Yes, that is exactly why I am here!

QuoteSo, you might find that even though you believe that your direction is the most sensible and truly the only obvious direction to take, others only want to look and watch.
Since they are full of their ideas, they do not have any more extra time to look at and read other people's ideas than you do.

I do understand and I do my best to simply stick to the point.

QuoteIt will probably help you get your ideas across faster and better if you make it really easy. And, that might make it more difficult for you.

I honestly don't know how to make this any more simplistic! Place a wire in the sky, use the circuit I posted, then stick a rod in the ground. That's all there is, really.

QuoteOn the other hand, I have found that when I was forced to explain myself again just to get any response, I found that the process helped me a lot. So, even though it is more work, it may in the end benefit you as well. (it may not, of course.)

The benefit of us all is exactly why I'm doing this in phases. I do honestly apologize if most do not believe this fact. But what is the point of sitting in a class room if your not allowed to ask a question, let alone offer an opinion in hopes of a reply?

QuoteProtonmom did not even notify us of her presence here until after she had read both earth battery threads entirely and I think twice at that time. Not only that, she had already made a Stubblefield generator. I am very impressed with this approach and I suggest you might acknowledge the effort. But, that is up to you.

I hope I have not been taken the wrong way. As far as I am aware, I have not disrespected anyone, all I have done is explain my theory and show some results which support my theory. If I am mistaken, then do please correct me. If this is not the place for experimental discussion, then do please tell me where to go. And yes I do mean that literally! Like you and most others I'm sure, I do not want to waste time on those who will not listen let alone participate.

So for those that have actually tried the experiment, I do commend you for your efforts! But I hope all can understand, I need help too. I have peaked and I will show this along with how I did it. But I desperately need new ideas in the process. Again, if this is not the place for such things, then do please tell me where to go.

Maybe it's the age old story, men are from mars and women from venous, or something like that. But unlike most, I at least will listen, which doesn't mean I will do, but only means I will hear you. Unless you tell me, I'll never know. So again I thank you. I'll do my best to appease all parties.

So here are some pic's that hopefully will show up in this post. I don't know, it's only a test and not even half of the total package.

But here we go. I hope it looks Okay, but I think I can go bigger. I'll learn, just give me time.

Thanks,
t3t4


jeanna

t3t4,
Those pics and annotations are perfect.

I am getting 2.1v in the total of the 2 batteries.
I see the difference is in both the depth and height, but I find it interesting and disappointing that you are getting only 1 more v than I am.

Are you storing this in a big or little battery?
I am using a 2, AAA battery holder.

thank you,

jeanna