Nathan Stubblefield Earth battery/Self Generating Induction Coil Replications

[electricme]

@kukulcangod

The you could get more power out of the same earth cell array by building it using larger copper pipes and zinc nails, but like all things, bigger means more expence.
The copper is always the positive and the zinc is the negative.

I also made a earth cell array out of aluminium pipe and copper pipe.
The copper pipe was the central electrode, and the aluminium larger pipe is the negative electrode, I simply insulated these using plastic shopping bags but it worked, the copper is still the positive, but the output is reversed to a copper zinc array.

I was able to connect this set up in series with the other dissimilar cells and it worked OK.

Remember, this is a galvanic reaction, it dosent seem to get any energy from the ground.

If you could make each cell bigger, then you will get more power (not voltage) out of it.

jim 

[almon]

congratulations to the many experimenters here who have successfully replicated the stubblefield self generating induction coil. after reading the previous 242 pages of posts it seems to me that many of the experimenters dont believe that they have been successful and continue to try to get large amounts of electrical pow dorectly from the coil. in my thinking of this matter that is a waste of both time and genius. the success of this device is the ability to create a magnetic field with no input of power. this alone can be used to provide HUGE amounts of usable power. one thing that might help experimenters is the important advice of mr bedini. in one of his posts he recommended the study of the model T ignition coil. the specification chart on this coil indicates that the ratio of the number of turns on the secondary to that of the primary is a whopping 78 to 1. how does this comapare to the coils built by the experimenters here? another of his "hints" was to not worry about measuring  voltage and amperage, and in this he is absolutely correct because the real power of this device is its ability to create a magnetic field with no electrical input from a conventional battery or generator. A TRULY FUELLESS MAGNETIC FIELD GENERATOR. try this  "thought experiment": imagine how tesla's design of his first and higly succesful brushless AC motor could be adapted to use magnetic fields created by the stubblefield cell !!!!!!! light bulbs appearing over anyone's head yet? also cangrats to lasersaber on the nice videos and his perserverance in attempt at at an identical replication of the device in the patent. more thoughts to come later

[electricme]

@almon,
Firstly, thankyou for your 1st post, and welcome.
You are to be commended for reading through the entire thread, well done 

Yes, what you have written is very positave for all of us who have been studying the Stubblefield Cell, and your comparison between the Stubblefield Cell and the ignition coil is almost spot on. The differences are the methods of powering the separate coils themselves, and Lasersaber has jemmied the door open for everyone with his successful replications, but we have a little more to do though.

The ignition coil needs a 12 volt battery supply to create the magnetic field in the primary winding, which when it collapses, creates a high pulse of energy which is converted to a very high voltage by the secondary coil, which has huge number of turns of very thin copper wire. The function of this coil which was designed by Nicol Tesla which I believe is a MODIFICATION of Nathan Stubblefields original stubblefield cell.

The Stubblefield coil on the other hand creates its own magnetic field via the pulsing action formed by the dissimilar metals in the primary windings, the collapse of the magnetic field would then produce a voltage, be it much lower than the ignition coil, and people must start to forget about putting many thousands of turns on the secondary of the stubblefield coil, or thinking only high voltage is the answer when it is not.

This coil is designed for a completly different purpose, of low cycles and low voltage but a higher amperage.
To get lower voltage you wind in the "hundreds only of turns, but you must use a much thicker wire, as the thicker wire carries the grunt, Amps etc.

If anyone wants to know what I am trying to explain, just go and get yourself a simple cheep transformer or a wall plug pack, then take it apart, and looko at the transformer itself. (it won't bite)
Take a multimeter and put it on ohms, then take some readings of the Primary and secondary windings.
Look at the wire windings, the thicker wire is the secondary, OK enough waffling on.

So how does the stubblefield coil work? Well the 2 dissimilar metal wires when wet, begin to form a connection between them, (electrolysis) this begins to create a magnetic within the iron windings and the iron bolt, at some stage the wetness becomes too much, and the iron and copper cannot sustain the electrical energy, so the coil sees a semi short circuit, so the energy between the dissimilar metals shuts off, in turn the electro magnet which had formed, collapses, which creates the high EMP which is picked up by the secondary windings.
Once the cycle has ended, there is nothing to prevent another cycle from starting again, and again.

This would explain why Lasersabers coil gets working and falls in output, the coil is wet to begin with, it starts to dry out and at some stage it has selftuned itself for optimum output, as it dries out further, it begins to fall in output, until more moisture is applied to the coil. 

BTW, Bill (Pirate88179) is dealling with the passing of his constant companion of many years, of his cat Puss last week, and I would like to say I'm with you Bill, been there and done that myself a little while ago, know what you are going through, so take care mate.

I was very honoured to meet Puss via skype last January, thankyou Bill.

jim 

[almon]

thanks for the nice welcome. as i said in my first post, the creation of a fuelless magnetic field seems to be the strongest asset of this device. i asked myself, why did tesla and others who knew of this not pursue its development? the only answer i could think of was that the writing was already on the wall in regard to this type of development: THOU SHALL NOT. just like mr bedini said in one of his posts, whenever he started being successful with it the "thought police" advised him not to think too much and he wisely agreed. but back to the use of this magnetic field. another "thought experiment". i will refer to lasersaber's videos since all are familiar with them and a picture is worth x-number of words. imagine a setup like lasersaber's. imagine scaling it up. not the coil, as it already works fine. imagine his little magnetic motor being replaced by a large round table top with 120 magnets spaced 3 degress apart or 180 magnets spaced 2 degrees apart. probably several coils would be required, but with this large flywheel storing lots of energy when in motion, there would be room for many more coils around it. for higer speeds a beld and pully system could be attached, or the table top could be attached to an automotive wheel, driving the differential in reverse of the way it is driven by the cars engine. either way a series of 100 amp truck alternators could easily be driven by it with only a regular dc-ac converter needed for 110volt ac. perfect for use at a camp or other remote site. "free" energy is here  now.

[jeanna]

Hi almon,

Welcome to the group of people who experiment with the stubblefield generator.

I still have a few rows to finish on my lasersaber replica.
I made the mistake to make the wire 19awg, and it is uncomfortable for me to wind.
Lidmotor's uses 24 gauge steel and he told me this was easier to wind, and we can see by his videos that it works well.
I have 9 more cores, and perhaps I will make a thinner wired version after I sort out the motor part.

Please try your ideas and share the results of your tests with us.

thank you,

jeanna