Nathan Stubblefield Earth battery/Self Generating Induction Coil Replications

[gaby de wilde]

@ Gaby:

Thanks very much for the link.  This never came up in any of my internet searches.

Google cant read text from images jet. But if you look at their patent search it's not far away

I have not read all of it yet, but I will.  This goes with Stefan's premise that the more surface area you have, the more amps you can produce.

Yeah, up to some point I think the location matters the most. Or maybe it's better to call it the soil if it also works isolated.

It is consistant with the patents we have read.  Thanks again.

I'm curious what kind of effect charging this battery would have. ^_^

PS  Have you tried any of this yet?  If so, what were your findings?

BIll

ha-ha, I'm trying to avoid everything that doesn't relate to permanent magnet motors. Just that is already to much work for me alone. I already drew a gravity engine by accident. It's an awful design, it doesn't seem to want to get debunked. No it appears the invention wants to be build by me specifically. hehehe

You should make a website about the earth battery, having wikipeida as the NR 1 result is pathetic. We should be ashamed as a species.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth_battery
Earth battery - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

It's not a bad wiki, it doesn't say "this innovation was debunked by a 12 year old skepticus who doesn't know anything about the topic" like wikipeida does about most free energy inovations (if it even allows them to have a page.) They merge stan meyer with the waterfullcell? O_O Maybe we can merge Bush with the patriot act? lolzz?? Maybe that's just a weird thing to do?  no?

But if you look at the talk page you can see the disinformation brigade spew everything they can make up. Ow how this article needs to be deleted? When listing facts everything needs a source but when debunking things we can just take random opinions and use that. ROFL

Don adsitt correctly says there is galvanic action going on. But some guy on the wiki talk page says he tested it and the galvanic reaction should produce a far smaller current as what he got.

Adsitt's link obviously appeared on the page a hundred times.

My gut says this is the ancient art we are talking about here.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geomancy
Geomancy - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I recognize this

In recent times the term has been applied to a wide range of other occult, fringe, and pseudoscientific activities, including Bau-Biologie. This article deals with geomancy in its traditional meaning.

This is the handwriting of the disinformation brigade.

on the other page wikipedia says:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bau-Biologie

is a science that investigates the indoor living environment for a variety of irritants. It is a comprehensive science that considers our living environment as an organism, and considers how its functioning can produce a restful or stressful environment. Far from being "fringe science", its experiential findings provide robust guidelines to use in building a healthy home, or healing one that is sick. 

The disinformation brigade clearly was not as interested in Bau as in the earth battery. Surely if it was a fringe science it wouldn't have a page in wikipedia. The page says "FAR FROM BEING FRINGE". Does it need to be more clear then that?

I think our agent bubbie found a great excuse in that to be able to delete a lot of information from the page. Lets have a look....

ah-ha

From the first contribution to the geomancer page.

a kind of divination by means of figures or lines, formed by little dots or points, originally on the earth, and latterly on paper.

This was changed into:

is a method of divination that interprets markings on the ground.

Now look what happened here:

"little dots or points" is less accurate as "markings" no question about this.

"in the ground and later on paper" has changed into just "ground". Which is less accurate.

Later the word ground is even replaced by dirt. That's probably more scientific right?

It's not a kind of divination that interpreters markings.

It is the means of divination.

It's like saying it's a kind of car mechanic that repairs cars.

they make the markings. They don't just interpret them.

A kind of car mechanic who looks at defective cars?? 

Now do you see how much lies got injected into that single line? I'm not that confused by this but I bet it's confusing enough for some. I'm at least confused enough not to be able to build an earth battery from the info..... lol

How do we get the numbers on the galvanic action? How many years would it take to show? What to compare it to?

Poking a hole in the ground reminds me of an old story about condoms being promoted in some native place. The next year they return and they see the condom over a pole exactly the way they had demonstrated it. Before sex they pull it over the stick and put it in front of the hut.

The person demonstrating the earth battery probably took his rods with him?

All knowledge that remains is the poking of the holes? We know that part is probably correct, now guess what else did they do?

It reminds me of those wands the ancient egyptians hold. Those are said to be made of 2 different materials and to affect their user in some way.

Would Galvanic action be comfortable in your hands?

I cant imagine....

[Localjoe]

Well thats an interesting theory but were trying to keep on track with our current experiments so if you have any ideas on how that applies to the rod elrctrode testing phase were in please share your results and how geomancing increased your results vs what has been posted so far. And remember to take the measurements defined earlier in the thread if possible to share and compare.
                                                                                Thanks
                                                                                          Joe

Aright I cant help myself with this one , What would a necromancer do then?  Survey the dead.

[Pirate88179]

Well, I have exhausted all of my local sources for graphite or carbon rods so now, I am awaiting quotes from internet companies.  This is frustrating!

@Stefan:

I guess one could make a graphite rod but, when you use glue, or any other binder, you will decrease the electrical properties proportionally.  the best graphite rods are iso-pressed, isostatically pressed at thousand of psi.  My old company, which I lost in my divorce, had a supply room of thousands of ceramic and graphite materials, sorted by size and material compostion.  I tested one of my graphite/carbon composite golf shafts and it has a continuity reading of zero, if you scrape off the gloss finish and paint.  I am also searching for magnesium rods, or will settle for zinc if I have to.

I want to get on with this!!!!!!

Bill

[FreeEnergy]

guys look at http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,948.msg46100.html#msg46100

[hartiberlin]

Well, I have exhausted all of my local sources for graphite or carbon rods so now, I am awaiting quotes from internet companies.  This is frustrating!

@Stefan:

I guess one could make a graphite rod but, when you use glue, or any other binder, you will decrease the electrical properties proportionally.  the best graphite rods are iso-pressed, isostatically pressed at thousand of psi.  My old company, which I lost in my divorce, had a supply room of thousands of ceramic and graphite materials, sorted by size and material compostion.  I tested one of my graphite/carbon composite golf shafts and it has a continuity reading of zero, if you scrape off the gloss finish and paint.  I am also searching for magnesium rods, or will settle for zinc if I have to.

I want to get on with this!!!!!!

Bill

Hi Bill,
the advancement of normal or earth batteries can only occur, if we find
a binder, which is not walter solveable and which can bind graphite to
textil or paper or other forms of bigger surface material without degrading the
conductivity of graphite.
So has anyone tried different forms of glue to get this ?

Many thanks.