Nathan Stubblefield Earth battery/Self Generating Induction Coil Replications

[t3t4]

 Today is a bad day for reasons that I have yet to understand fully. I completed my second phase of testing to show you all, but I'm embarrassed by the results. Keep in mind that I don't keep notes, I don't document nor do I have a pictorial or a video log of any kind. So I am simply trying to repeat my previous experiments from memory. Just bare with me, okay?

I will show you below in pictorial form, the capacitor in the sky, but since it sucked so badly, I decided to move on to the inductor in the sky. All of which sucked (enter your own metaphor here)....

From memory, the cap in the sky did quite well. Also from memory, the inductor in the sky did much better.

This day was terribly humid as we have been having a lot of rain/thunder storms here lately. I know why humidity can change results, but not like this it can't, and I won't blame my failure on the weather! My system works rain or shine, day or night, so why do the individual components fail to function today? I can't remember ever receiving such poor results before today.

But, on the plus side of things, this is why I am re-running all of my previous tests. If I did it once, the I should be able to do it twice, correct? But I want to make sure it wasn't a fluke in either case. Well, today's testing consisted of all brand new components, not my originals. All were hand made as before, but all failed "unlike" before! I'm not going to blame the weather, so take the results for what you see.

All tests were performed the same as the last, the same ground, meter, connections, as well as the height. Ground to gutter is 16', same as the last.

I said that I would only tell you the truth, so, here we go. Think what you will, but keep in mind I have one more demonstration remaining. I hope these pic's show up well, their larger then the last batch.

t3t4

[Pirate88179]

Today is a bad day for reasons that I have yet to understand fully. I completed my second phase of testing to show you all, but I'm embarrassed by the results. Keep in mind that I don't keep notes, I don't document nor do I have a pictorial or a video log of any kind. So I am simply trying to repeat my previous experiments from memory. Just bare with me, okay?

I will show you below in pictorial form, the capacitor in the sky, but since it sucked so badly, I decided to move on to the inductor in the sky. All of which sucked (enter your own metaphor here)....

From memory, the cap in the sky did quite well. Also from memory, the inductor in the sky did much better.

This day was terribly humid as we have been having a lot of rain/thunder storms here lately. I know why humidity can change results, but not like this it can't, and I won't blame my failure on the weather! My system works rain or shine, day or night, so why do the individual components fail to function today? I can't remember ever receiving such poor results before today.

But, on the plus side of things, this is why I am re-running all of my previous tests. If I did it once, the I should be able to do it twice, correct? But I want to make sure it wasn't a fluke in either case. Well, today's testing consisted of all brand new components, not my originals. All were hand made as before, but all failed "unlike" before! I'm not going to blame the weather, so take the results for what you see.

All tests were performed the same as the last, the same ground, meter, connections, as well as the height. Ground to gutter is 16', same as the last.

I said that I would only tell you the truth, so, here we go. Think what you will, but keep in mind I have one more demonstration remaining. I hope these pic's show up well, their larger then the last batch.

t3t4

Hey, do not ever feel bad about posting results that worked one day, and not the next.  In this, lies the information we all need to understand.  Why did this work before and not now?  What might be different?  You mentioned different components, etc.  Understanding stuff like this is why we all are here.  There are clues here that will help us in our understanding.

I have posted in different topics about things that worked one time but not now.  All information is good and, since this is basically a think tank, maybe someone will come up with a reason and this will lead to a better understanding of what might be going on.

So, carry on and, I know myself and many others are glad you are here.  It takes guts to post stuff that does not work up to expectations.

Bill

[t3t4]

I've been watching what others do here on posting pic's. I just placed 400 x 400 give or take and I think it can go more. Has anyone tried 600 x600 pixels?

Thanks,
t3t4

[t3t4]

Thanks Bill, I appreciate the vote of confidence as well as confirmation of what this site is about.

t3t4

[xee2]

@ t3t4

I've been watching what others do here on posting pic's. I just placed 400 x 400 give or take and I think it can go more. Has anyone tried 600 x600 pixels?

Thanks,
t3t4

With the new larger posting limits I usually use 640x480. A while back the size of posts was more limited and then I used 320x240.