Nathan Stubblefield Earth battery/Self Generating Induction Coil Replications

[jeanna]

I have a question...

Have any of you tried to marry the earth battery to the radiant energy receiver by using them in combination? If so, can you tell me, was it good or bad?

Thanks,
t3t4

I think that was my reasoning behind adding the 2 stubblefield coils to the ends of the EB.
My results went way way up.
The eb typically gets 7.5mvAC I am referring to AC since that is what I believe you are talking about.
When I added the first stub to the south end the mv went to about 25-35mv and then with the one on the north they went to 48 to 55mv.

Now, in the past week I have been trying to find a good inductor to add to the middle and the best I can find so far is the storebought 220uH inductor.
If I add that the numbers go up another 20mV. and average around 75-85mv.
But just to say the peak voltage I got yesterday was 115mv.

So the total is low, because it is all in the millivolts range, but the fluctuations are natural, and I am hoping to find a better combination in the near future.

I made a youtube video to show how the stubblefield coil acts as a radiant receiver.
I had the secondary of the stubblefield coil connected to the scope when I turned on a joule thief and the scope showed that the stubblefield coil was receiving 105mv. This time it was without much variation.

BTW the coils that I am using on the BEER do not perform as well as the one in the first video. But also, the BEER is not using the secondaries of those coils.

If you missed that video here it is.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D_wAsAeUIHA
(the next video shows 2 more with the same effect, but smaller voltages.)

Oh I must add my bit about making mistakes in public.
I really appreciate that you have the courage to show the mistake.
It helps us all and, really what is a mistake?
nothing.
but mistakes are a way to move forward as much as successes are.

so thank you t3t4,

jeanna

[t3t4]

Interesting, I have seen this similarly which makes me wonder what is positive and what is negative.

In the automotive realm when dealing with DC voltage or current, you find the negative moves towards the positive. All current flows from negative. Why is that?

I don't claim to know. I can only say, that seems to be how it wants to move. I have found both positive and negative potential within the earth. Which is greater? I still do not know.

Thanks for the update.
t3t4

[dllabarre]

My results from the 2 aluminum plates got worse when I unattached the wires from the pole and insulated them from touching the pole and even  worse by separating the 2 wires from each other. 
So my conclusion is that most of the mV I was getting came from the wires being attached to the pole and the wires being together even though insulataed from each other.  I was using a standard 12/2 with ground house wire.  The kind of wire that's in the walls of houses.

Now I'm moving on from using the pole and aluminum plates.

DonL

[dllabarre]

I have found both positive and negative potential within the earth. Which is greater? I still do not know.

Thanks for the update.
t3t4

My EB...
1/2 inch copper pipe 4 feet long, 5/8 inch zinc threaded rod 3 feet long.
22 feet of 12 gauge copper insulated wire between them.
Aligned North copper pipe to South zinc rod, adjusted for 12 degrees off of magnetic North and adjusted for depth of magnetic lines in my location.
The ground here is 8-12 inches of dirt then all sand below that.  I've dug a hole over 4 feet deep and its all sand.
1,000 years ago (or more) there used to be a river here hence all the sand.

I've never got more then .9 votls.  I've read where people get 2-4 volts with very similar set ups.  I average .6 volts.  I think it's the sand because sand doesn't hold water very well.

The copper pipe is always positive thus the zinc rod is always negative for me.

DonL

[t3t4]

No, thank you jeanna,

I'm quite used to being looked down upon, so I have no fear of that. Actually, the only thing I fear anymore is spiders and heights. Only because I can't seem to kick the habit I guess! Spiders just freak me out cause their the ugliest looking things I have ever seen. Heights scare me, because I know how bad it will hurt when I hit the ground. It's funny though, I've gone sky diving to beat my fear, and what I found was, falling is the most fun you will ever have! It's getting into the plane that makes your butt pucker up, and then the take off! But falling is easy, and a lot of fun if you ask me!

I think that was my reasoning behind adding the 2 stubblefield coils to the ends of the EB.
My results went way way up.
The eb typically gets 7.5mvAC I am referring to AC since that is what I believe you are talking about.
When I added the first stub to the south end the mv went to about 25-35mv and then with the one on the north they went to 48 to 55mv.

Now, in the past week I have been trying to find a good inductor to add to the middle and the best I can find so far is the storebought 220uH inductor.
If I add that the numbers go up another 20mV. and average around 75-85mv.
But just to say the peak voltage I got yesterday was 115mv.

So the total is low, because it is all in the millivolts range, but the fluctuations are natural, and I am hoping to find a better combination in the near future.

I made a youtube video to show how the stubblefield coil acts as a radiant receiver.
I had the secondary of the stubblefield coil connected to the scope when I turned on a joule thief and the scope showed that the stubblefield coil was receiving 105mv. This time it was without much variation.

BTW the coils that I am using on the BEER do not perform as well as the one in the first video. But also, the BEER is not using the secondaries of those coils.

If you missed that video here it is.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D_wAsAeUIHA
(the next video shows 2 more with the same effect, but smaller voltages.)

Oh I must add my bit about making mistakes in public.
I really appreciate that you have the courage to show the mistake.
It helps us all and, really what is a mistake?
nothing.
but mistakes are a way to move forward as much as successes are.

so thank you t3t4,

jeanna

I had to quote your whole post because I feel it's important. The Ac is what I am personally most interested in, but not when trying to charge batteries, for obvious reasons. If we want power to run our homes or whatever, then focus on the AC. Otherwise, if we want to charge batteries which is where I began, even dead ones that have been declared junk, then we want to focus on DC. It's easy to transform AC into DC, but it's not so easy to understand how you can put 1.6 VAC in and receive 3.2 VDC out. And actually, it goes beyond that. But, how do you receive more out then what you put in? All of which is free mind you. It's not stealing, but rather harnessing or otherwise utilizing.

It's all about frequency and resonance, as simple as it sounds, it's still true.

Thank you jeanna as well as the rest who have been able to participate. I tell you all honestly, I have interest in jeanna. No, not because she is a woman, but because she is some 6000 miles away from me on the same continent. We are about 180* degrees different. That means something to me. If she can do there what I can do here, then it seriously limits the number of variables.

I don't quite understand why your not receiving the same results as I am. Even my first demonstration showed well over a volt, and I did it sloppy. So, could you show me what your doing please? I'd really like to see it. I have no doubt whatsoever, that with your current understanding, you can far exceed me. All I ask, is that you look at what you see, don't hit the books every time you have a question. Just take it all for what it is. I will help in every way that I can.

And thank you for the video jeanna. Yes, there may be something going on there. But I said before, inductance, inductance, inductance, and then make it resonate! I will honestly do my best to show this. But I do so wish I had a video camera. I used to, but I sold it. Yeah, not one of my best moves, I know.

But thanks again to all,

t3t4