Nathan Stubblefield Earth battery/Self Generating Induction Coil Replications

[Pirate88179]

@ MW383:

Great post.  Of all the Stubblefield stuff I have read, I do not recall reading this before, maybe Jeanna does.

Stubblefield declared it to be an "energy receiver ."

I am glad to read this as it means our new term EER (Earth Energy Receiver) is more accurate.  We pretty much knew it was not a battery back in our early days but we called it that because that is what everyone was calling it.  I think we should continue calling it an EER, especially now that we read that Nathan himself called it that.

Maybe Jeanna could re-post the lay lines or earth energy map that she posted somewhere before.  On that map, a lot of the lines crossed at the location of Nathan's farm, or at least in that general area.  I seem to remember Jeanna thinking those lines crossed in my area, which might explain my success but actually they crossed about 2 hours drive to the west of me...right near Murry, KY.

Bill

[protonmom]

@All
out of habit from the beginning of when I joined in the discussion, I have been calling it an NS EB.  I believe I should be calling it a B.E.E.R or at least a E.E.R as the rest of you do.  I do like the BEER name, heh heh.  It is, after all, a Bi-metallic Earth Energy Receiver...but I can go with EER also.  I believe it was either Bill or Jeanna who came up with both of those names.

Now I have a question about placement, too.  If I were to "bury" (up to the neck, perhaps?" the EER in a hole which is already about 10 feet deep, I would still have it in the ground.  Do you think it would capture any of the earth waves that far down?  I was thinking I would make a box that had all kinds of contraptions to test and hook the box up (in the house) to the buried EER down there in the hole and see what all happens.  (I would have easy access to it all winter)  This is an area where the water pipes come into the house.  No electric wires, just the water.  Would that (the water pipes) have any effect on the EER?
I thought I would also see about getting an oscillator and try that out too...as soon as I can afford one, that is.  And as soon as I finally make a JT, I will also see if that can be incorporated into the whole setup in some manner. 
I plan to draw out the schematics and make a homemade type "breadboard" of sorts for each different component to test.  Therefore I can see just what an inductor does, or an additional coil or capacitor etc., might do.  And it would all come off from the same "buried" EER.  And of course, take pictures of each test.  That is my plan.  Do you think it will work that far down into the ground?

[jeanna]

Now I have a question about placement, too.  If I were to "bury" (up to the neck, perhaps?" the EER in a hole which is already ab...



... Do you think it will work that far down into the ground?

There is only one way to know!!

... Would that (the water pipes) have any effect on the EER?
I thought I would also see about getting an oscillator and try that out too......

water pipes are usually a ground for something and often for the telephone... out west anyway.

A joule thief IS an oscillator... a darn good one too.
They usually run you about $2.50. Can't beat that price!

@Bill,
I really want to know the source for that.
I have seen in the brochure reference to things I missed, so it may even be there.

Here is the ref to magnetic/ inductor:
These 2 parts of the brochure contradict some of MW383's references.
I would like to see the source??? please?

jeanna

[protonmom]

Sorry...I meant Oscilloscope, not oscillator.  I must be tired tonight.
Edit:  aside from my spelling mistake, my main concern was whether or not burying the EER that deep in the ground would work or not.  The reason I ask is because a while back someone said that most of the earth waves were near the top of the ground.  Not sure who said that or where.  Yes, the only way to find out, I suppose, is to go ahead and do it. 
And so I will.

[jeanna]

I don't remember who said it either, but all the pics show them above the ground so I think that is where they go.
Mine are on bolts which determine how far above ground they can go.
I buried one and ruined it .
It is fine if it is dry, but it got shorted and never worked when wet again.

So, my opinion is they should be above the ground.
My best result is 85mVac not much. Certainly not what all those words sound like, so I am not the person to ask.

I just made a lot of em and tried hard...

jeanna

Edit
MW383
Maybe you have not seen these videos?
I had a NS EER connected to my scope one day and turned on a joule thief circuit and the NS EER made the scope do a dance at 100mV

This is the reason for my new experiments with 2 of them in the ground.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D_wAsAeUIHA
This is the first one.
The little green one is the one that can no longer get wet, but it still does something as you will see.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C9ZFKDSxFTE
This is with 2 more generators both of which are now in the ground.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jjgldKgRU9w
This one is the little green one and one big pipe one (now in the ground) and  The really cool part is that the NS EER ia picking up as much as 350mv from a joule thief which is at the same time lighting a fluorescent light.
The joule thief is providing 450v for the fluoro tube, and at the same time the NS EER is 'receiving' 350mv from the air!

They are short, but youtube is slow for me these days. Just let them buffer to the middle then you will see them through.

jeanna