Nathan Stubblefield Earth battery/Self Generating Induction Coil Replications

[jeanna]

Nice find, resotron!

I agree with joe about the spark gap meaning high voltage.

I also want to add a piece of interesting info that might be appropriate here.

In my earth run joule thief, after the initial galvanic reaction which makes the light bright, the brightness dims, then builds over time. Putting the initial part aside for a moment, I want to address the building up part.

It makes a perfect sense to me.
Each coil (remember they are always pictured in pairs)  pulses, and with each pulse, it builds and pulses again. At some point , maybe after one hour or a day, the pulses reach a point of sparking. Then, it begins again, but from a higher point.
Also, the cap in parallel will collect the HV that is not high enough to spark.

But this center part is a circuit seen in tesla's parallel line circuits.
This is fascinating.

I never made 2 NS generators alike, and I always thought I should. Now, I will.

Thank you so much resotron.
and welcome!

jeanna

-----------------

... this is also why on the drawing of the coil you see the first row copper iron then second row iron then copper then switches at the next one ...

But, Mark, that is NOT how it is drawn. It is drawn one copper and one iron next to each other bifilar.

I have found that the iron does not last very long. It gets brittle and snaps off.
The zinc covered steel/iron wire outlasts the plain iron.

sorry,

jeanna

[Mk1]

@jeanna

You are right , it was late i should have gone to bed , lol

But the big drawing shows the first and last row of each layer as the same .

Anyway i got confused .  Sorry

Btw i posted the screen saver picture of my coil ...

Mark


That drawing again looks quite exciting , it look like a hair pin circuit .

I also noticed that the second out put at the bottom is only connected to the cores  interesting .

Also the coil on one battery is pulsed by the rotor of the other battery i assume its to synchronize both coils ...

[Pirate88179]

No offense meant to Resotron here at all but if you look at the enlarged photo section, I really have my doubts that this drawing is authentic.

This photo is an enlarged small section of the wheel on the device and also, I am posting the photo in the negative to better show the artifacts that are revealed.

What do you guys think?

Bill

[jeanna]

I was wondering about this being a fake, when I signed in at EF.
Someone had just posted this and said he thought it was so.

I present a screenshot of the pic from the patent and this one.
I turned one upside down .
It also needs to be reversed left to right to see it perfectly.
Note the cross hatching directions.
A section of bifilar winds has been added to the center area and the number of bifilar turns becomes identical when you put these together.

Also note the shading of the bolt head is reversed but identical.

On the nut holding the center bolt there are marks that delineate the screw threads. These being the same mean nothing because the precomputer techniques would allow one to put one pic under the other over a light box and trace, HOWEVER, the thin line which is out of place on that screw was the arrow line from the #2 on the patent.
It would not be there if someone used the trace method.

Darn.
I still like the circuit.
But I will replicate lasersaber's copy first!

jeanna

I edited the pic some more and made the color better and reversed the image so now right is to right and left to left.

[Pirate88179]

Jeanna:

Good work.  Go back and look at my previous post again.  I was re-sizing it under edit when you posted so now, it is large enough to see what I was talking about.

I totally agree with your findings as well.

Bill