Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Nathan Stubblefield Earth battery/Self Generating Induction Coil Replications

Started by Localjoe, October 19, 2007, 02:42:39 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 124 Guests are viewing this topic.

Artic_Knight

joe i believe both metal rods i have are covered in a anti corosion agent which may be stopping my amps, i swapped the poles and got the same reading no difference, granted i have not aligned them properly!  but no amps. the one rod is either copper or aluminium coated with a coper color.

ok so the magnetic field of the earth and the earth equals a faraday disk? sounds perfectly resonable. how can we tap this principal better?  i doubt copper coils suspended in air will do that well seems the earth is doing a much better job for us if you ask me.  perhaps we should combine the faraday principals with the earth battery principals? 

we know how a faraday disk works so my question since i joined this forum is what about plates instead of rods? according to science you get more current from a battery when there is more surface area on the electrodes so im thinking we need to play with plates now eh?  i have not probed for the best results from my rods yet but from what i gather from the work done here we are going to need to go deeper however not too deep, i believe those 8 foot poles at lowes would be the best but they would not lend them selfes well to being readjusted in the ground so one would have to get it right the first time.

hmm whats the best way to get your hands on a copper metal plate? guess im googleing

yea the steel might be bad even worse if aluminium is what i have for the other but its free and proves a valuable point to me :) now i know and i can hopefully use freebies to find better results without needing other metals just yet,

hansvonlieven

G'day Jeanna and all,

To answer your question, quite frankly, I do not know why Meyer insists on uninsulated iron wire. It was simply a specification stated in the patent that I took as read.

Only experiment will determine if it does make a difference using insulated iron wire. My feeling at this stage is that Meyer wanted as little interference with magnetic forces as possible. That is of course just an idea I have, not necessarily what he had in mind at all.

At this stage I feel I have taken the subject as far as theoretical considerations and research allows. It is now time to set up some experiments that will validate or invalidate the findings so far.

In my next essays I will show my idea of how such experiments should be set up and what they are supposed to determine. This will take a little time, but I am working on it. I have already started to procure the necessary materials since I want to run the experiments myself, perhaps with some of you joining in so we can compare results.

I love working with you all, you are good people and God willing we will get somewhere with this.

Greetings from Aussie,

Hans von Lieven
When all is said and done, more is said than done.     Groucho Marx

sid10

I think that TPU stands for Toridal Power Unit,
not sure of the spelling
Sid
The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked.

Pirate88179

@ Joe and all:

I just wired up the cell for the experiment Joe asked me to run. I will post those results shortly but first, I wanted to post my testing of the volts in this setup today.

As I explained about the carbon rod cut in half, I wired the cell as follows:

8.5 " long carbon rod (+) to the north wired to the other carbon rod 8.5" long (+) 3 feet to the east.
Magnesium block (-) to the south aligned ONLY with the left caron rod.

1.90 vdc
2.00 mA (Steady, not falling off like before!!)
3.2 vac

These are some pretty good numbers to start Joe's test.  I discharged the cap. Dead. I drained it by hooking my meter to it in the 200 mA setting and watched it drain down to 0 from 1.8 mA.

The test will be how long the led stays lit after a 30 second charge on the cell.  If that time is not very good, I will do longer charges and keep track of the results.  Man, it's a little chilly out there, but not too bad.

@ Hans:

I think I speak for everyone here when I say that we are very lucky to have you working with us on this project.  Your research and insights have been invaluable.  I really look forward to working your experiments with you.

Bill
See the Joule thief Circuit Diagrams, etc. topic here:
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=6942.0;topicseen

Artic_Knight

ok i found out i am using galvanized steel and copper painted aluminum, so after some filing and 3-4 inch depth i have gotten .4-.6 volts at 1 miliamp  so if i remember right im operating at half to a third of what others have seen with better materials. i will try a cap to see what i can get i did not measure ac at this time but i did before i stripped the pipes and got .06 volt ac its raining here so hard to experiment but will do more later