Nathan Stubblefield Earth battery/Self Generating Induction Coil Replications

[ian middleton]

G'Day all

               @mramos:  You will find that your cell phone signal is being absorbed by the moisture in the tree.
The signal isn't going anywhere. Some theories suggest that the absorbed phone signal increases enzyme activity
in the leaves and may warm them up by a micro degree or two.

  Ian

[Freezer]

I tested that rod (either carbon or graphite) in soil with some zinc strips. 1.02dc volts | 1.2AC volts | 2.2mA.  The soil was pretty moist, so I will test again when dry.  I think I could get a led lit with about 3 of these in series.  I laid these in horizontally, as there's no way I could pound that shaft into the ground that far.

[Localjoe]

@ freezer

Awesome electrodes!  You could probably cut those in quarters that would be about the size of the electrodes i used and my amperage was close to yours i think the highest i got before the snow was 1.3 -1.8 ma and the voltage was about 1.2 to 1.4 depending i was just using a copper pipe and zinc screws.  Anyways cutting those pieces should still yied the same result individually and then you will have 4 couples to put in series.  Just a thought
                                                                                     Joe

[Artic_Knight]

mramos i believe i said 2 miliamp  and neglected to say voltage,  my reading was .5+ volt at 1-2 miliamp fluctuating, the fluctuations occured half second 1 half second 2 and repeated steady.

jenna do you have more concrete left? perhaps make one last "pot" and in this one have 2 electrodes spaced nicely appart, when the concrete is poured run a 12 volt battery current through it?  you may find you will need to pulse it to keep it from generating too much hydrogen in the water mix.  what im thinking is this may align the quartz crystals in the pot for better electrical conductance... just an idea if your bored i dont have any concrete handy.

[hansvonlieven]

G'day all,

Still studying up on ground antenna I found the following passage. It it is interesting because we found out earlier that Stubblefield was doping the earth surrounding the batteries with metal salts and pitchblende. He could have very well used copper sulfate, in fact this is extremely likely. Anyway, see for yourself:

Added articulate dimensions made their appearance in a regime of improved ground antennas. Some designs employed chemical saturations to produce greatly clarified and intensified signals. The revolutionary approach began as a chemical treatment to existing ground terminals, a treatment giving superior empirical results. Chemically treated terminals brought a complete eradication of static.

The chemical of choice for these "treatments" was copper sulfate, the watery solution being liberally poured upon the buried terminal until the soil became a slurry. Allowed to dry out, these terminals displayed their enormously improved outputs. In other such experimental arrangements, copper sulfate solution was placed in a large porous cup. Contact was made with the solution with a metal rod. This design completely eliminated common static and other crackling noises, a significant improvement which also provided new insight into the nature of ground signals themselves.

The performances of chemically treated ground antennas was not well comprehended, it being simply assumed that the earth-permeating solutions projected a conductive horizon beyond the antenna itself. Poured into the ground and allowed to dry in situ, such solutions were thought to extend a wonderfully articulate matrix of "fingerlets" beyond the metallic antenna framework. Crystalline, complex, and replete with dendritic projections, such arrangements became ?woven into the earth". How did such an underground crystalline complex manage to multiply signal conductivity, while depressing all of the expected levels of static? Ensheathing the metallic framework, the crystallized solution represented a non-conductive envelope. How conductive was the crystallized "matrix" at all? Electrically unresponsive in its dried crystalline form, any such copper sulfate sheath should have blocked the entrance of all purely electrical currents. What carrier was then delivering its obviously improved signals?

Let me know what you think

@ Jeanna, As far as I know Stubblefield never mentioned cotton insulation for his iron and copper wires He simply called it insulated.
I believe the cotton idea was a later addition because of the assumption of galvanic currents being involved.

Hans von Lieven