Nathan Stubblefield Earth battery/Self Generating Induction Coil Replications

[jeanna]

Hey Joe,
There isn't anybody in this farming community that can tell me what a ferrite bead is. Even the radio shack folks just look blank at me. ugh.

From what mramos said it isn't magnetic. It must be just iron??

So, could I use a hex nut? It is iron with a zinc coating so that should be OK and the little edges don't stick out too much. I'm hoping???

jeanna

[Localjoe]

@jenna

So do you have any bailing wire/iron wire you could wrap with this and insulate the copper from it via cloth?

The iron wire in that case would be your negative electrode there should be no connection to the center bolt/screw.. although that will yeild a reduced figure if bolt is used as neg, not how he intended. still cool tho

@All
**The play between the copper and iron wires surrounding the iron core is what produces the effect.. every time i touch my amp meter to it at first it reads between 16- 20 ma... awsome .. but it goes down quick... note well when i take my grnd lead of my meter and touch it on and off on and off of the steel wire it shows the strong 16- 20 reading each time ... so i can see how a spark gap driven by other means could repeat this process much much faster and in turn we would then take the power of the single wire that is called the secondary wrapped around this whole cell #4 which is recieving the flux from the mechanical pulsing of the primary.. .  im thinking the rate at which the spark gap fires the circuit will be the freq of the secondary current, call it pulsed dc or ac at that point.  thats what were going for. And im sure that certain freq/speeds of the gap will yeild far better results in our secondary so lots to play with folks once we get there.

[Pirate88179]

@ Jeanna:

From my ceramic machining days.......ferrite is fe2O3, iron oxide.  This is much different than iron.  We machined many different ferrite configurations for waves guides. (microwaves)  To me, a ferrite bead is like you would find on a circuit board in a toroid shape with copper wrapped around it.  I have salvaged several of those while taking apart no longer needed electronics stuff here.  Maybe the electronics guys here can set you straight but, I am sure about the first part, but guessing on the second.

@ Joe:

When Hans was telling me about the old points used on cars for the spark with the coil, he said that now they use the computer which makes use of an ic, I think he said 555, to "make and break" the circuit so the volts can be stepped up by the ignition coil.  Do you think this might be an option for us?  This is what I meant when I said a long time ago that we have stuff available to us that Tesla and Stubblefield did not have.  Otherwise, we could use something mechanical which, from your analysis, is most likely what Stubblefield used.  I am working on my coil as we speak.  I have plenty of old cotton socks I am cutting up.  I am not going to concern myself with the secondary coil.....yet.  Self-inducting coil.  Gee, that almost sounds like over unity does it not?  I also agree now that you have made the patent information clear to me, that Tesla's fingerprints are all over this.  I truly believe that he and Stubblefield were much more than just acquaintances.  Hans has alluded to this many times also.

Bill
This is just the beginning of something big, I can feel it.

[Localjoe]

@Bill

A 555 might work but remember the description of a blue corona coming off of the secondary wires.... Im thinking that a Physical make and break might be needed for at least inital tests i could be wrong but easier to start the old fashioned way and work up.  Electro statics and other fields sometimes have laws of their own which make semiconductor components useless when trying to achieve a desired effect sometimes.  But i would say try both in the end.

This is looking more and more like a little Tesla coil....Thoughts folks

In essence we would be synchronously discharging an inductive capacitor(the earth battery) into its own primary bifilar coil.  which would create a large current in the secondary  amazing ..

[Localjoe]

To all


I just got through reading bedini's whole page... even he didnt understand there were two seperate devices... amazing ... i feel like i deserve gold star..

On bedini's page it says

In addition to this bimetallic winding, there is a third winding: the "secondary". This third coil is insulated from the primary bimetallic coil, serving as a trigger device. Presumably, a stimulating impulse shock was introduced into the tertiary coil, after which the upwelling electrical ground response brought forth powerful currents in both iron and copper coils.....

This is completely wrong he  mis understood the patent .. because later he writes..

Furthermore, though the Stubblefield power receiver is wound like an induction coil, it produces a steady direct current output. This poses additional problems for the conventional engineer. Electrical induction only occurs with electrical alternations, oscillations, and impulses.


Poor guy answered his own questions... we provide the oscillations in the primary  and the power comes out the secondary ..... not visa versa.. what was he thinking..  That dis info must have made it to 20 other pages and people took that to be true without reading the patent... shame on him.

what he does bring up that is very important but not entirely true because we know Tesla and Stubblefield worked together at some point is

Stubblefield may have discovered the auto-magnifying voltage effect of electrostatic induction in coils before Tesla,  who later utilized the effect in his special electrostatic Transformers.

hence the real accounts of intense surges after a rain storm......