Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Nathan Stubblefield Earth battery/Self Generating Induction Coil Replications

Started by Localjoe, October 19, 2007, 02:42:39 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 185 Guests are viewing this topic.

georgemay

Quote from: jikwan on February 05, 2008, 08:36:28 PM
power spots may put out a lot more voltage

Jikwan,
That can be easily tested.  I know how to use both - pendulum and divining rod.   When I have coil working I will definitely test it and report the results here.
George

georgemay

Quote from: Freezer on February 05, 2008, 12:41:32 PM
Here's what I drew up so far.  Don't come down to hard on me, as this is just a start, and lots of things can change.  I'm not stating this is the correct way, I'm just looking for feed back. I want to get it right before I even start to build.

http://img100.imageshack.us/img100/145/cellstub2ll3.jpg

Frezer,

I see that you cut and wound as each separate layer.  What would be advantage or disadvantage of such method?  one advantage is that I think it is easier to wind it as I experienced that returns are bi*ch to do without shorting the whole damn thing.

On another hand could it be possible to wind only iron layer then only copper layer e.t.c.  - Any comments?

George

Freezer

Quote from: georgemay on February 05, 2008, 10:54:58 PM

I think we want to closely resemble the original design as possible, and in the patent it seems as if it is done that way.  It seems it acts as a electromagnet in the vertical, and when charged it might accelerate this energy through the rod, and the making and breaking could cause a pump type flow of this current, thats just my guess.

This is the revised image with the secondary wrapped along the outside.  I still have some revisions to do.  I know the guy stated 6 gauge wire, but I have no idea where I would get that, I can't even find it online.

Localjoe

@Jenna
     you wrote

"please see page 2 LL 76 to 86:
Quote
It will also be obvious that by reason of the magnetic properties of the coil body 4, the core piece 1 will necessarily be magnetized while a current is going through the body 4 so that the battery may be used as a self generating electromagnet, if so desired, it being observed that to secure this result is simply required connecting the extended terminals of the wires 5 and 6 together after wetting or dampening the coil body.
(coil body 4 is the bifilar coil) (and outside pair of terminals 5 and 6 are to be used for a load in the case that it is being used strictly as a galvanic device, which it is clear to us that it is NOT his intention of the patent.)  However, once the outer terminals of 5 and 6 are connected to each other, the magnetic field begins to spontaneously occur and the iron core keeps it going for some reason."



Dont confuse this with the induction coil version were working on.  This is the other device.  You probably know that i just want to make sure newcomers dont get confused. 

When you connect terminals 5 and 6 that creates the electromagnet. .. this is important.. for the base station transmitter model.
when you make and break them as opposed to constant connection as prior you create impulses in the secondary. our self generating induction coil :)

in your second question you state
"2) Did he start this idea that the core is removed or  made of wood? I don't believe it is at all. In fact because of the magnetism I am seeing, I think the core spike is a very important part of the build up which produces the current that will go in the secondary."

This could be partially right but the core shouldn't matter in a resonate transformer...Eg Tesla Coil. what matters is driving the primary coil at the proper freq in relation to the length of the secondary and desired result

Now without a bolt there, just think for a minute.. every time you shorted the primary coils together and apart. you create an impulse in the secondary coil .. Use the hand rule for current and thrust and you realize that the thrust is in the center just like normal in an induction coil ... That motion then actuates the spring mechanism in the coil.. i can see this happening.. so think about it as to no one really knows yet and i feel this theory holds stock.

To further back that up. i feel that the purpose of the bolt is for the base station transmitter / SELF SUSTAINING ELECTROMAGNET because here the secondary is attached to a microphone  or telegraphic relay. Now picture the process of the audio transformer,  the secondary will send an impulse into the primary whose wires are shorted and that energy will be forced into the core . Here is where this device gets tricky. I think that whole process has something to do with the core already being saturated from the primary  and then applying a hf pulse to it  but im still working on theory for it.  In the mean time stick with the induction coil model the other one and hopefully we can get some usable energy. Then we can move on to long distance chats with each other  :)
GET THIS ONE - Bush wants to stop Iran from enriching uranium .. now as oberman said and others any drunk coke head can find out how to do this not just bush.

Also in reality Google has provided this info for some time.. so heres my point.

It's OK for GOOGLE TO PROVIDE INSTRUCTIONS FOR URANIUM ENRICHMENT but not OK FOR FOLKS TO SHARE TORRENTS OF MUSIC THEY POTENTIALLY OWN> AS WELL THEIR GOODS SHOULD BE SEIZED AND CHECKED AT AIRPORTS For copyright infringement.. ?????

This is the world we live in. More concerned if some exec doesn't get his buck than if some terrorist blows us to hell..

jeanna

Hi all
@George,
I am not really sure about the thickness of wire. I wrote it down when I heard that radio broadcast because I wanted to have that secret of success. When I was at the radio shack and asked the guy what #6 wire was he told me it was way thick etc. If there is a different numbering system where a 6 could make sense, I'd like to have a look. I thought awg was the one the radio shack guy was talking about but maybe he wasn't.

@Freezer
I agree with you that we should be making this as close to the patent as possible.

@Joe,

I am afraid I am pretty confused. Why are you talking about a base station? Is that your way of describing what is happening here or is there a page I am missing?

QuoteDont confuse this with the induction coil version were working on.  This is the other device.

Which is what other device?

Quotei feel that the purpose of the bolt is for the base station transmitter / SELF SUSTAINING ELECTROMAGNET
I agree that it is a self sustaining electromagnet but what do you mean by base station transmitter? do you mean because you plan to create a spark gap here?


Maybe you could put it out step by step in order for me. I doubt I am the only one not sure of what this transmitter is. or why we are not talking about an inductor.

jeanna