Self powering PMM Motor

[Localjoe]

you are wrong but its ok cause its an unusual way. Check this out get 12 small cylinder nefb magnets and gather 4 steel mouse balls , strip the rubber off. take the magnets and connect 3 balls in a circle with 2 mags in between each link this should take 6 magnets and orient them so the polarities are attracting ball facing ns ball ns ball ns in circle. Take remaining 6 and make 3 sides with the same polarity facing up place last ball on top to form pyramid ... somehow this concentrates a pole of your choice depending on the direction of the polarities in the base and the 3 sides all having s poles connected to the top ball or n pole and opposite base direction. I was amazed when i did this at first, and i really don't know what possessed me to try this , but this seems to be a use for it 

[Low-Q]

you are wrong but its ok cause its an unusual way. Check this out get 12 small cylinder nefb magnets and gather 4 steel mouse balls , strip the rubber off. take the magnets and connect 3 balls in a circle with 2 mags in between each link this should take 6 magnets and orient them so the polarities are attracting ball facing ns ball ns ball ns in circle. Take remaining 6 and make 3 sides with the same polarity facing up place last ball on top to form pyramid ... somehow this concentrates a pole of your choice depending on the direction of the polarities in the base and the 3 sides all having s poles connected to the top ball or n pole and opposite base direction. I was amazed when i did this at first, and i really don't know what possessed me to try this , but this seems to be a use for it 

I'm not sure how this look like, but I think I have a picture. You're having three steel balls, each linked with 2 rod magnets facing NS/SN to eac ball. That should be 6 in total. Then you have 6 magnets left which you're attaching 2psc. each of the three balls, facing all the same polarity in the same direction. A 4.th steel ball is then "hooked" up whith these 6 magnets oposite pole. So you have made a triangular pyramid. If it's so:

The three linked steel balls cancel out the magnetism of all 6 magnets between them, so never mind these anymore. Then you have 6 magnets left pointing in the same direction, towards one steel ball. I cannot see this setup as nothing else than a regular magnet - viewed as one unit. Or did you have other thaughts?



Vidar

[Nutcracker]

Just a half baked idea.  I can not verify this since I do not know how to run femm yet.

This is a take off of the Cheniere ppt file. In an attempt to make an unbalanced magnet left to right.

Attached is the slide 3 of the ppt file and a crude drawing I put together.

The thought is to place a very thin piece of material on the side of the magnet that will absorb only SOME of the flux on the one side.  This would need to be something that saturates completely quickly so it doesn't take too much.

If someone could do a quick simm of this, it would be interesting to see.

Sorry for being an armchair participant.

Nut

[Localjoe]

I wouldn't have wasted my time explaining it to you man if i didn't know it worked.... through the theory out the door get 12 magnets and try it ... Jeez people now days . think of the base as a neutral array and the top as a concentrator.  Anyways i tried putting the magnets in many directions before i stumbled on this and the reason i know i'm right is because i sat there with a table and weights and tested it for about 2 hrs with different items and and went as far as hanging the pyrmiad upsidown by string then seeing what objects it would hold in mid air not touching....This finalized my conclusion because when i changed the con fig some items were not held vertical by attraction the force was not great enough but when rearranged it works.  Then I proceded to bring it to work and rf engineer explain to me why this was he said his best idea was that the base serves as a neutral array and the top is a concentrator. but it deffiantly concentrates the force dependign on how you do it.  And once again the balls are in attracing mode on the base we could say        ns ball ns ball ns ball   

[Low-Q]

Just a half baked idea.  I can not verify this since I do not know how to run femm yet.

This is a take off of the Cheniere ppt file. In an attempt to make an unbalanced magnet left to right.

Attached is the slide 3 of the ppt file and a crude drawing I put together.

The thought is to place a very thin piece of material on the side of the magnet that will absorb only SOME of the flux on the one side.  This would need to be something that saturates completely quickly so it doesn't take too much.

If someone could do a quick simm of this, it would be interesting to see.

Sorry for being an armchair participant.

Nut

The document you're refering to has an idea how to actually move one field line from leftside to right side so the total number of magnetic lines are not equal on both sides. However, the iron part will in fact move more magnetic lines to that side you put the iron, but as soon as another magnet is approaching, its magnetic fields also want a piece of that iron, and the forces are again symetrical. I am calculating some other ideas how to "trick" the magnets, so stay put.

Vidar