Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Dr. Lindemann?s Electric Motor Secrets DVD

Started by hartiberlin, December 05, 2007, 08:55:19 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

CTG Labs

Not practical I should imagine because a battery can either be charging or discharging, not doing both at once (not effectively anyway)?  Surely it would be better to run from one while charging another and then have an automated circuit with relays to swap them around?


D.

z_p_e

Quote from: mramos on December 08, 2007, 10:16:53 AM
Why would it not be possible?  The circuit (reed relay) is open when the BEMF fires, the transistor will not conduct, the diode would direct the pulse to the + terminal (and it is all grounded)?  I will look at the drawing I did and check the current paths, but at a glance it looked good yesterday.  I have no motor, so I can not play with it anyway.

Far as practical.  An electric motor that run forever (until a part failure) would be slick.

Examine Lindemann's diagram and you'll see that the charge battery is in reverse polarity to the run battery. Why? Because the inductive kickback is of reverse polarity to the run battery. That's why it is not possible, unless you quickly reverse the leads of the run battery during the inductive kickback, and this makes it impractical.

Bedini himself realized later on that it is far more viable to use a separate charge battery. Prior to this, he was using full wave rectifier bridges in an attempt to charge the run battery (i.e charge itself), but if one does an analysis on this, they'll see there is a problem with this approach. Follow the current paths.

Chad

if its not possible to charge the run battery, as stefan mentioned in the first post..do you thing it could be hooked up to a generator to power itself?, if this is a possibility i may have a go at building one.

chad.

nightlife

Why couldn't there be several coils used so that one kick back powers the next and so on making it self powered. Once it was made self powered couldn't the out put shafts be used to generate power?

Low-Q

I can't wait to see when the motor is running a generator that is providing energy to the motor - via rectifier and capacitors. Should be easy as h..., as the inventor claims the battery to be charged.

Vidar