Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Why the Newman torque is low and what to do about it

Started by kmarinas86, December 17, 2007, 03:01:31 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

kmarinas86

It seems that most of the designs of Newman motors I have seen have have coil walls that are many times as tall as they are thick.  But the software program I used to see what would be the optimal coil, in terms of getting a high inductance for a short coil of lower mass, were coils whose walls were about 6 parts tall to 5 parts thick (or sometimes 9 parts tall and 8 parts thick).   The Newman machine replica I made (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2FNTTyGjs04) had a coil ratio similar to the one considered optimal by the software program I used (http://www.datavoyage.com/coilmaestro/).

For
Inductance L = 0.405 mH or L = 0.404 mH
a = height of coil
r = width of the coil wall
d = wire diameter
O = wire length
W = wire weight

OPTIMAL
N = 114
D0 = 24.0 mm
a = 9.0 mm
r = 8.1 mm

d = 0.8 mm
L = 0.405 mH
O = 11.50 m
W = 51.6 g

R = 0.4 Ohm
--------------------
SUB-OPTIMAL
N = 149
D0 = 22.0 mm
a = 20.0 mm
r = 4.8 mm

d = 0.8 mm
L = 0.404 mH
O = 12.53 m
W = 56.2 g

R = 0.4 Ohm
--------------------
TYPICAL NEWMAN MACHINE FOUND ONLINE
N = 187
D0 = 23.0 mm
a = 40.0 mm
r = 3.0 mm

d = 0.8 mm
L = 0.406 mH
O = 15.27 m
W = 68.5 g

R = 0.5 Ohm
--------------------
TYPICAL NEWMAN MACHINE FOUND ONLINE
N = 222
D0 = 23.0 mm
a = 60.0 mm
r = 2.4 mm

d = 0.8 mm
L = 0.405 mH
O = 17.69 m
W = 79.3 g

R = 0.6 Ohm
--------------------

Now, a major problem with the larger Newman machines is the special commutator you need to even move the thing, because the current is so low.  The alternative, say for a medium size machine or better, would be to maximize the inductance for the coil used.  Now, this would mean a higher wire to magnet ratio.  But it also would mean a magnet with more specific torque.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Energy_Machine_of_Joseph_Newman

Ray0energy

 ??? ??? ???

TYPICAL NEWMAN MACHINE FOUND ONLINE
N = 222
D0 = 23.0 mm
a = 60.0 mm
r = 2.4 mm
d = 0.8 mm
L = 0.405 mH
O = 17.69 m
W = 79.3 g
R = 0.6 Ohm


0.6 ohm?????????????
what ar u talking about its 10/20 ohm or more on a typical newman motor coil

Ray0energy

stop giving people the impression that u no a lot because u don't u "quote" text  and copy and past.
on your you tube site u delete all comments of people that try to make a debate.
and the most irritant thing is u don't answer but u just go over it wit your long talks of BULLSHIT Sad Huh

pleas stop this sick madness






i am sorry fore the rest of the people of this forum that i have to say this here.
but on his You tube site its not possible if u ask him something that he he don't no he WILL delete the commend.

There is no debate possible wit this gay he even don't no how a transistor works
but he will be the 1e! to put a comment on adder you tube users that made a Newman motor.
but its not really a commend because it really don't add any important info its just BLABLA ??? >:(

1 time i hat to delete more then 5 comment of him because u can't see anymore the real comments of older people
if there was a limit of 10.0000 letters he will use all of it  >:( to just QUOTE his bullshit

kmarinas86

I said:

"It seems that most of the designs of Newman motors I have seen have have coil walls that are many times as tall as they are thick.  But the software program I used to see what would be the optimal coil, in terms of getting a high inductance for a short coil of lower mass, were coils whose walls were about 6 parts tall to 5 parts thick (or sometimes 9 parts tall and 8 parts thick)."

You responded:
Quote from: Ray0energy on February 20, 2008, 05:38:47 AM
??? ??? ???

TYPICAL NEWMAN MACHINE FOUND ONLINE
N = 222
D0 = 23.0 mm
a = 60.0 mm
r = 2.4 mm
d = 0.8 mm
L = 0.405 mH
O = 17.69 m
W = 79.3 g
R = 0.6 Ohm


0.6 ohm?????????????
what ar u talking about its 10/20 ohm or more on a typical newman motor coil

I am sorry. When I said "TYPICAL NEWMAN MACHINE FOUND ONLINE", that was misleading. What I should have really said was that

"a = 60.0 mm
r = 2.4 mm"

Where "a" is the length of the coil and "r" is the thickness of the coil, corresponds to the fact that in many Newman motors, the coil is longer than it is thick.  This post I made last year, in fact, not even a month after I started making these "Newman motors" (which are not actually real Newman motors). Anyway, glad that is over with.

kmarinas86

Quote from: Ray0energy on March 05, 2008, 07:13:39 AM
stop giving people the impression that u no a lot because u don't u "quote" text  and copy and past.
on your you tube site u delete all comments of people that try to make a debate.
and the most irritant thing is u don't answer but u just go over it wit your long talks of BULLSHIT Sad Huh

pleas stop this sick madness

You misoverestimated how often I delete other people's comments.  In fact, most of the comments I delete are mine since I later find I have misjudged what the person said, or decided that I could give a  better response.

And please do not refer to giving "thumbs down" to comments as deleting the comments.  They are not the same.  But I must admit that I still acted wrong.  See to it that I do not do this again on these videos.