Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Steven Mark`s TPU

Started by otto, December 18, 2007, 01:55:48 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

BEP


ronotte

@BEP,

-  The pulse transformer I'm using are doing very well their job and do provide isolation up to 2.8KV (there is a model that goes up to 5KV). They are cheap and may be found easily (cost is about 4 - 6 Euros/each).

OXFORD ELECTRICAL PRODUCTS
Pulse transformer (1:1) 3 mH, pcb mount, 2KHz - 1MHz range) model PT4 or PT42E (for 5KV isolation)

-  I'm still using my initial dotation of IRFP460 power Mosfet. In my current TPU V10-7 they are positioned inside the TPU itself and are provided with big Al heat-sink. This has been proven necessary as when you do tests often you are far from resonance ...or may make any kind of errors...so these devices with Ron < 0.4Ohm (if I remember well...) are potentially able to sink lot of current and so get burned before you (..that are looking at the scope....) are aware of it!  My suggestion is to use always current limited PS, decouple it just off the TPU, eventually insert a 2Ohm protective resistor  (..anyway this solution will have big impact on BEMF...so I don't use it).

-By  using pulse transformer (put between Gate and Source) the mosfet Gate has always a low DC path to it's own Source: this drastically eliminate any possible induction from anywere  (the mosfet constructors do strongly sufggest to use said solution....): I have seen it very well. The Mosfets themselves are put near the TPU centre.

- BEP, I'm interested about your suggestions on turn's number especially about the rules you mentioned, would you be so nice to explain it in deep or point me where to find full reports?

Here is my design:


Roberto


ronotte

ATTENTION TO EVERYBODY

THIS THREAD IS HIGHLY DANGEROUS AS EVERYTIME I POST SOMETHING OR I PM SOMETHING,
SOMEONE TRY TO SNEAK INTO MY COMPUTER A TROJAN


HARTI: PLEASE TRY TO STOP THIS ACTIVITY

ROBERTO

epwpixieq-1

QuoteNEGATIVE RESISTANCE

exerb from the Book "WAVEFORMS" - MIT Radiation Laboratory Series 1949

---- page 123
Negative-resistance Oscillators - ... Devices that exhibit negative resistance can be constructed in several ways. One of the simplest and best known methods make use of the secondary emission form the plate of a vacuum tube. An oscillator employing this type of negative resistance is called a "dynatron oscillator".  Most of the modern tubes are treated to reduce secondary emission but some older tubes exhibit this phenomenon very markedly.
----
Note that "modern" in the text references 1949 !!!

I am wondering if SM has used this knowledge when first constructed the TPU. As he stated with vacuum tubes it is easier to make it work.

Just a thought

ronotte

double post

HEY Harti: what's happening?

Roberto