Steven Mark`s TPU

[EMdevices]

-

[BEP]

Using my understanding:

Same polarity case ( always speaking of the E field, aren't we ):

The magnetic flux is always there. It only varies in concentration. At the point where they meet they actually add just like the E. The difference is when you add +1 and -1 the answer is zero. The 'net' magnetic flux, at that point in time and space is zero.

Opposite polarity case ( E fields again ):

Ditto except the H is then +1 added to +1 for a net magnetic field of 2 which, in energy terms is 4 times the magnetic strength. And E is now +1 added to -1 for a total of zero.

Laws of induction ..... Amazing to contemplate the possibilities.

Like I've said before - you weaken one the other fills the void. Choose which one you want and zero out the other 

[tao]

You guys aren't of Hungarian descent are you?

http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,3068.0.html

Just so others can grasp the idea of two wave fields in superposition leading to DOUBLE the energy output...Proven by Janos in theory AND via experiment, yes, he does have a working device...

[wattsup]

Hi guys,

I am a bit confused. If you used two waves, would you not require double the energy to produce two waves versus just one wave. So if two waves use double the energy, and they produce double the energy, where's the beef? Or are you saying each wave will produce double the initial wave, making four times more energy, versus the double energy required to produce two waves makes a net gain of double.

@tao

It's good that you bring his information back to life.

[Bruce_TPU]

Hi Tao,
That was a great post you made, thanks for the link to it.  I hate to say, I had not read it before tonight.

@ All
In my thread in my very last post, speaking of the transformer idea, with the opposing signals and speculating that the TPU with baling wire, may have been the baling wire used as steel laminations as a transformer.  And that the "Collector" made of litz wire (IMHO) collected the resultant addition of power.  I believe that is what SM meant when he call it the "Phenomenon of Magnetic Collection".

EM quoted a part of the Hungarian, to say that it would not work, BUT, I found this in Tao's post that puts into his words, what I was trying to imply.  I am still of this persuasion.

"The radiators should be arranged so as to have minimal back coupling between them (the wave radiated from the 1st source should cause minimal, or zero energy loss in the 2nd source and vice versa). If the arrangement allows the waves to expand in free space as spherical waves, then after the interference of the waves we will have to find a way to collect them again into a receiver antenna for utilization." (*This would describe the function of the collectors to perfection, as well as the tuning aspect of the collectors needed in the SM device.) 

I would also add, that a DC bias on the collectors only might also be needed, almost as a "positive plate" in a tube.  The bias would assist in collecting the electrons that are in free space..  Hmmmm...this is sounding familiar. 

Cheers all,

Bruce