Steven Mark`s TPU

[duff]

Nice shots of 'field lines'. Chances are pretty good the actual lines are still on the screen even when there is no magnet nearby. I would have put them there to help show the field shape just like 'field lines' were intended originally - only a way to visualize the shape.

Notice how all the subtext seems wrong? I doubt it is. I also doubt it is the magnetic H field he is showing.

@BEP

From what I understand the field lines as displayed by Sweet can only be
duplicated using a Sony Trinton.

The subtext is a description of the magnetic orientation as described in the video.

What is interesting is that these field patterns don't match whats in the text
books. If it is not displaying the magnetic H field then what is it...

I'm wondering what would be the implication if we modeled the field interaction, when two
pulses meet, around what Sweet/Bearden displayed in the video.

[BEP]

@BEP

From what I understand the field lines as displayed by Sweet can only be
duplicated using a Sony Trinton.

The subtext is a description of the magnetic orientation as described in the video.

What is interesting is that these field patterns don't match whats in the text
books. If it is not displaying the magnetic H field then what is it...

I'm wondering what would be the implication if we modeled the field interaction, when two
pulses meet, around what Sweet/Bearden displayed in the video.

Trinitron? Why does mention of this technology keep popping up? There were two main differences (that I am aware of) between the Triniton technology and others.

1. The trinitron used a separate cathode for each color (separate source). This may have changed to one in later years. I don't know.
2. Most CRTs used a metal plate with tiny holes where each pixel would appear when the beam penetrated. The trinitron had no metal plate. It used vertical wires (supported by 1 or two horizontal wires) to place the dots.

Thinking outloud....  place a magnet near a screen with the metal plate inside - just did it (good thing degaussing is built in) - Yep! just like the books tell us - in disagreement with the pics.
---now that my Tv and monitor are both goofed up ----
My old TV shows the same as his pics. So I can only surmize the computer monitor shows magnetic field effects (like the books. What is my TV showing?  I need to work on this.

BTW: no crt prep needed here. The TV has the horizontal wires showing. One about 1/3 and another about 2/3 from the top. The separate RGB beams made the 'field lines' apparent. Even a single bar magnet shows two distinct separate lobes. 1 at N and 1 at S.

Something else I just noted: My computer monitor is still screwed up (assuming it is not of Trinitron heritage). My old TV shows no signs now of my magnet games. Nope - no auto degaussing.

[BEP]

@Pese

I haven't been fluent in German in over 30 years but it is obvious you are right. Those documents are indeed 'a must read'. His math is far beyond me but the concepts are clear. (speaking of Dupre)

Thanks!

[EMdevices]

Ok guys,  I'm going to let out a secret   

What do you think?

EM

P.S.  The reasoning should be straight forward based on what we have been discussing.  You can buy power combiners for microwave work.  Do they multiply power?  No.   Why and why not?   Do you see the reasoning here.   The input impedance at the signal source is  1/2  z0, where "z0" is the characteristic impedance of the track, say 50 ohms.   We get 1/2 50 ohms since we have the two sections in parallel.

Power in is then: Pin = V^2/25  (for the short duration of the ON pulse, and assuming negligible internal source impedance for the battery/MOSFET circuit)

Now here's the magic.  At the other end, due to the slight taper of the lines as they combine (let's assume we can find a nice taper that minimizes reflections backwards)   the pulses combine and the voltage doubles since each pulse contributes a packet of charge, so double the charge double the voltage.  The T-line is now back to 50 ohms, and let's assume matched load of 50 ohms.

Power out is now:   Pout = (2xV)^2/50 = 4 x  V^2/50 = 2 x V^2/25 = 2 x Pin

You see, double the power input.   

Remember,  this device only works with pulses and in the transient mode realm.   If you just hook up a battery to the track, you can easily see it's nothing special.  The magic really occurs in the realm of ELECTODYANAMICS and transmission line theory.  This means fast short duration pulses.  A great man once said....."create lots of kicks for FAST SEND OFF"

[tao]

Ok guys,  I'm going to let out a secret   

What do you think?

EM

P.S.  The reasoning should be straight forward based on what we have been discussing.  You can buy power combiners for microwave work.  Do they multiply power?  No.   Why and why not?   Do you see the reasoning here.   The input impedance at the signal source is  1/2  z0, where "z0" is the characteristic impedance of the track, say 50 ohms.   We get 1/2 50 ohms since we have the two sections in parallel.

Power in is then: Pin = V^2/25  (for the short duration of the ON pulse, and assuming negligible internal source impedance for the battery/MOSFET circuit)

Now here's the magic.  At the other end, due to the slight taper of the lines as they combine (let's assume we can find a nice taper that minimizes reflections backwards)   the pulses combine and the voltage doubles since each pulse contributes a packet of charge, so double the charge double the voltage.  The T-line is now back to 50 ohms, and let's assume matched load of 50 ohms.

Power out is now:   Pout = (2xV)^2/50 = 4 x  V^2/50 = 2 x V^2/25 = 2 x Pin

You see, double the power input.   

Remember,  this device only works with pulses and in the transient mode realm.   If you just hook up a battery to the track, you can easily see it's nothing special.  The magic really occurs in the realm of ELECTODYANAMICS and transmission line theory.  This means fast short duration pulses.  A great man once said....."create lots of kicks for FAST SEND OFF" 

You never cease to amaze me EM, lol 

According to our Hungarian fellow:
"When two waves with identical polarization, frequency, phase and amplitude propagate in the same direction and meet (and merge) in free space, then their amplitudes will add together and the amplitude of the resultant wave will be double that of a single input wave."
AND
"Using sound waves in practice it might be difficult to achieve noteworthy outputs, since the practical limit of energy density is quite low in such arrangements. But using electromagnetic microwaves it is possible to make very efficient, relatively cheap and compact devices, without any moving parts. The output of such generators can vary from several kW to the range of GW depending on the size and types of the components. As you can see, this is a real free energy principle that works, and it has been confirmed by measurements and scientific analysis."

I was personally told about Janos, that he DID FOR SURE have working microwave-based devices and that they had to be VERY precisely built so as to perfectly (as well as could be done) superposition the microwaves. Once done, FE is yours...

So, time and again I thought of microwave-based setups and many other types of setups. I especially thought a lot about longitudinal setups utilizing such waves because there wasn't a 'polarization' that you needed to superposition, like when using transverse waves. (Even that the TPU could very well be working based on these principles)

I was never given enough information that would allow me to replicate Janos's device though, they kept the information closely guarded...

Congrats EM...

Can you explain the mechanism of the tapering and how it minimizes the reflections?