Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



smot leverage gravity wheel

Started by FreeEnergy, December 26, 2007, 05:49:00 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Print
Go Down Pages 1 2 3 4 5 6
User actions

nwman

#10
December 30, 2007, 02:14:25 AM
3) So in the middle of these two positions you would line up on that little red line as shown below. Again if you calculate it all out it would give you .9809 on the left and .9808 on the right, also known as balanced. The small variation is just rounding. So it doesn?t matter if you can move the ball left to right with a SMOT because the wheel is going to balance out. Now if you believe the SMOT is delivering energy to the system then that?s the source of energy and this design isn?t the best for harnessing that energy. I also am again not convinced of a SMOT until I see me experiment test that I mentioned before.

nwman

#11
December 30, 2007, 02:25:53 AM
Sorry for the cheesy graphics. I spent too much time as is on this. Also a comment on you smot test. There is a good chance your test will show a positive result. However be carefully to include the fact that when the ball rolls over the edge it is going to drop which is technically releasing potential energy that was stored in the ball when you placed it atop the upper level. The magnet my pull the ball to the side but it wont let the ball go free unless you let it drop off the edge. If you want to think of it this way. The magnet is pulling up/sideways on the ball and gravity is pulling down on the ball with greater force. Well technically the table it pushing up on the ball as well making the table and magnet force win. I believe this is called static force? Once you move the table out from under it then gravity wins the battle and pulls the ball away and kinetic energy is then release from the ball making it roll away.

Any questions? If not good luck.

Tim

FreeEnergy

#12
December 30, 2007, 08:13:48 PM
why are the balls not synchronize with the wheel's spokes?

the balls are suppose to be in sync with the wheel's spokes.

nwman

#14
December 30, 2007, 08:29:55 PM
For simplicity reasons I had the balls just leave the wheel and roll on a track to there next position free from the rotation of the wheel. You could have them attached to the spokes but there affective mass would be zero. Once the ball rests on the horizontal ramp gravity is pushing straight down and the ramp is pushing straight up canceling any force thus leaving no directional force to move it to the right. It would maintain this balanced state. I could make a graphic if you would like?

This is where what I was saying about the smot having to be the source of energy because it is the only other "potential" source of energy in the design.

Tim
Print
Go Up Pages 1 2 3 4 5 6
User actions