The Flaw Of The Electricity Theory

[imsoolazy]

Protons are NOT made up of electrons, they carry a couple of Quarks which have fractional charges, which combine to form a +1 charge. Same goes for Neutrons but with an over all charge of 0.

Protons and Neutrons are made up of Quarks.

Simple introduction:
http://particleadventure.org/frameless/quarks.html

Bit more complex:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quark

And this is how electrons flow in particles:
http://www.madsci.org/posts/archives/2001-03/984251056.Ph.r.html

[Schpankme]

So, I wanted to point to you all the major flaw of the current theory of electricity.

A "neutrino" has THE SAME SPIN as an "electron", yet "neutrinos do not carry an electric charge". Same with "neutrons" they have "no net electric charge", yet they have the same spin too...

Hello One,

You open this thread by complaining about the current Theory of Electricity; next you subject the reader, to Science Fiction (the neutrino), to prove your point.  Do you intend to bore us further with "double talk", or facts ?

Beam me up Scotty,

- Schpankme

"I once shot an elephant in my pajamas, how it got there I'll never know" - G. Marx

[armagdn03]

So, I wanted to point to you all the major flaw of the current theory of electricity.

Today, electricity is "electrons" flowing through wire. "Electrons" are subatomic particles that carry a "negitive electric charge".

So, if "electrons" create "electricity", then what creates the "electric charge" inside of an "electron"

Is there an electron moving inside of an electron???  NO. That is the flaw...

Electrons carry "electric charges".... That would mean an electron is inside of an electron...and that is false.

Some of you wannabe's will say that SPIN is what creates the "electric charge" but you are WRONG. A "neutrino" has THE SAME SPIN as an "electron", yet "neutrinos do not carry an electric charge". Same with "neutrons" they have "no net electric charge", yet they have the same spin too...

So you see, "electric charges" is the wrong term for it. How can a "proton" have an "electric charge"?? Does a "proton" have an "electron" inside of it? NO! We shouldn't even call it ELECTRICITY.

A "electron" has a negitive electric charge of −1.6021765 ? 10−19 coulomb.

A   "proton" has a positive electric charge of +1.6021765 ? 10−19 coulomb.

Protons, and Electrons ARE THE SAME THING, AND THE SAME STRENGTH. The only difference is one is "negitive" and the other "positive".  Protons and Electrons ARE ATTRACTED TO EACH OTHER! It's funny that "electric charges" have a law...

"In general, same-sign charged particles repel one another, while different-sign charged particles attract."

Wow, just like North and South of magnetic force!

All these year's science has been searching for "monopole magnets" and we have had them right under our noses!! LITERALY, because our noses are made of these monopole magnets.

An electron is a South monopole magnet. A proton is a North monopole magnet. CRAZY.

"Negitive electric charge" and "Positive electric charge"?

From now on, you shall call it:

"South magnetic force" and "North magnetic force".

Thats all it is, ALL IS 0NE.

Interesting observations, but I have to disagree.

Positive and negative are not attracted to each other, they never have been. They only seak the center of peace from whence they sprang. Since one cannot be created without the other, it apears as if they are headed towards each other, when in reality they simply want to cancel, and become one agian. All polar oposites seek one thing, to return to the void, to return to peace, to return to neutral.

[scotty1]

Positive electricity is composed of streams of North pole individual magnets, and Negative electricity is composed of streams of South pole individual magnets. They are running one stream of magnets against the other stream in a whirling right hand twist, and with high speed.
Protons and Electrons...Are you sure they are not the North and South pole magnets. If we have anything we have to show that we have it. Show the base where it came from and show how the thing functions.
We can find concentrated north and south pole magnets in the Earth in a metal. With the metal we can demonstrate that the free north and south pole magnets are circulating around the Earth. In the North Hemisphere the south pole individual magnets are going up and the north pole individual magnets are coming down. Those free circulating north and south pole individual magnets are the building material for the magnet metal we find in the Earth. This should show that the north and south pole magnets are the real atom builders and not the Protons and Electrons.
I think the north and south pole individual magnets are running in an orbit around a common core in an atom....the core could be a particle of sunlight....
If it were called  magnetricity....then i would accept it.
If guided in the right channels they possess perpetual power.
When the magnets are in the battery, they only possess pushing power, but when the connections are made the magnets aquire pulling power.
Ed. Leedskalnin.  1946

[argona369]

>Does a "proton" have an "electron" inside of it?

No, but a neutron can decay into a proton or electron
When unconfined from an atom.

?As neutrons die, they disintegrate into other particles, including protons?
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2003/10/031015025048.htm

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/particles/proton.html

http://www.planetanalog.com/news/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=201807801

the true core nature of the electric charge is unknown i believe.
(electrons are charge carriers, not charges)

>And this is how electrons flow in particles

Electron orbitals,
http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=observing--orbitals