Muller Dynamo

[i_ron]

E2Matrix, pls look here -- http://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=853.0 

Data I've taken with a Tektronix 3032 shows Pout/Pin ~ 7.   We would welcome replications or any input or questions you wish to provide.   (Are folks allergic to that other forum?)

Allergic???  try "that other forum is run by egotistical, power and control people" who have banned me. I wouldn't recommend it to anyone.

Ron

EDIT: well, the fine folk over there have reinstated me... just like that! LOL

     

[plengo]

E2Matrix, pls look here -- http://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=853.0 

Data I've taken with a Tektronix 3032 shows Pout/Pin ~ 7.   We would welcome replications or any input or questions you wish to provide.   (Are folks allergic to that other forum?)

Hello professor,

I do go to that site and it is though to see the "OU does not exist" ALL THE TIME. I like MileHigh's comments and dissertations about how wrong things are and how in a illusion we are but it is ok, at least he has been polite to me. I know he does not say good things about Stefan (which I think is totaly wrong).

He also asked me to post some of his comments (when he formulate a nice one for this Muller experiment) and I agreed to post so we also have another point of view from someone that claims to be an EE by profession. I know some here hate that but it is healthy some of the counter-arguments once in a while, not all the time like TommyL non stop thingy but sometimes is ok when it is well versed.


I have to confess that I don't understand some people coming here and "vomiting" their disprove of our "faith" and "believe" in OU and our efforts in helping the world, but, there are people of all kinds in the world.

I again, would like to ask ALL to be focused. Not for me, but for all the other ones that will come and read this thread and see how we are changing the world one step at the time.

I will continue deleting non-sense and non-related posts with the exception of the ones that are small jokes and uprising of our efforts and great videos like that guy flying in the mountains. We are just like that guy flying, we can't fly but we still do, don't we?

Fausto.

[poynt99]

Fausto,

While there are a couple of folks that are hard-lined "OU is impossible" on OUR, the majority of us are there are open-minded, and even hopeful that someone some day will come up with something amazing....like Romero has apparently shown us.

Please also note that sometimes the skeptics are the most vocal, so that's most likely why it seems you are hearing skepticism ALL THE TIME. Read between the skeptic posts at OUR and here, and you'll realize that there are more supporters or 'neutrals' than there are skeptics.

Regards,
.99

[e2matrix]

E2Matrix, pls look here -- http://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=853.0 

Data I've taken with a Tektronix 3032 shows Pout/Pin ~ 7.   We would welcome replications or any input or questions you wish to provide.   (Are folks allergic to that other forum?)

I was somewhat oversimplifying when I said I was unaware of any solid state OU as I do know about your work on the JT style circuit.  That's great you are investigating that but I was trying to get tommy to respond about his circuit.  I think he's a troll or a lost cause to the skeptic side though.  While I find JT's somewhat interesting I've never seen anyone scale one up to useful levels unless you call lighting a bunch of LED's useful.  Lighting LED's doesn't impress me a lot since I've got a stock flashlight from over 10 years ago that's still running on the same AA's and it can run about 5 months 24/7 on it's lowest setting.  Also have a light that ran 3 years solid in blinking mode before the single CR123 battery died.  However I haven't kept up totally on your work but if you are at COP ~ 7 then getting abundant energy should be easy at that point by looping it and scaling up.  Have you tried looping yet? 

I think Romero's / Muller's device gives us a shot at making some real world useful energy. 

@i_ron   yep know what you are saying

[infringer]

Everyone seems to be overly concerned with the drive coils, trying to build something to be highly efficient, but the device Romero showed had an abundance of excess energy and some loss should not be a problem.

If it is difficult to get the generator side to output this excess energy then doesn't this appear like a red flag?
Not trying to be negative but first things first.

This is the kind of reasoning that will keep us missing a possible overunity event.

Just because one wind turbine the same size generates 1000watts does not mean the the next one that is almost the same will generate the same amount of power. Even with simple generation like this the amount of captured energy has many many factors that come into play and wire for distribution and coils play a huge role!

These kinds of blanket statements I believe will only teach us not to be investigators but instead just go with the status quo. In order to achieve OU or anything grand we have to learn to be better investigators rather then continually working with the same mindset or framework in mind we need to expand our horizons a bit further to open up to a many things that may be in plain sight which we are missing. If you insist that that thing is batteries hidden so be it I think it is fair to have such a thought. But if we sit back and do nothing and claim everything is impossible I dunno what exactly one could gain from such actions or statements really?

While I do not entirely object to physics I do object to there not being some form of abundant energy through out the universe that we are not aware of. I object to the fact that we are using the best forms of wireless communications that there is. I object to the fact that nothing moves faster then the speed of light.

Is it easy to discover any one of these things? Absolutely not?

Does it mean that it is impossible well I think there may be physical evidence in our reality that points to the answer of no. We are indeed missing something big I believe. And it may be a multitude of little things. Who knows for sure.