Muller Dynamo

[konehead]

Toranarod wrote:
"I also seem to recall that Tesla believed the capacitor to be the key to free energy. I am starting to think the same. Go Back to the EV gray Motor.

the coil shorting experiments lead me to this conclusion. HI current low voltage and convert it the voltage again into a capacitor. with no load on the drive system.  this is where todays test have concluded.

this is the wave form of the coil shorting test. the voltage goes over 200 volts when collected into a capacitor."

Kone replies:

what is the "base voltage" in the coils "before" shoritng?
What do they make from just the magnets going by inducing power through diodes into cap unloaded?

How quickly does the capacitor go up to 200V? does it take few seconds or is is instant?
the only drawback I see to coil-shorting is the TIME it takes to fill cap - faster and faster cap filling is what you want.  Its not going to lug the motor filling the caps as you jsut reported, and its not going to lug the moto when caps hit load if you have a two-stage circuit for output either so its all lenz lug free.

I am very glad you are getting the coil shorting to not affect draw to motor part of it that is how it is supposed to be!

Lidmotors recent video points out how important the timing and pulsewidth of that shorting-event is too.

All you need to do now is have a TWO STAGE output circuit so that the capacitor dumps into load when it is also disconnected from the coils at that same time and you have a pure no-lug no lenz law generator.

you will proably get better performance if you fill two caps altenratively so that nothing is lost when source disconnects ("diode plug")

Personally my lousy opoinion is that making a rotor speed up in a constant-shorting condition is not really a real-world test for alenz-free genrator -
it should be a resistive load that mkes things speed up and in DC too...why would anyone want to short a coil continous?
you cant take power out that way for one thing...ist jsut an experminmet..its something on right track tha tis for sure, but shoritng  AT PEAKS into caps for very short duration pulse widht and then later on dumping caps later on into load wiht caps disocnnected is easy simple way to get no-lug genrator...timing, switching, caps and the load....

I really think Romero's rig does it all "naturally" with those magnets behind cores properly tuned down to the 1/4mm spacing...the timing of ploarity-flip at TDC, the swtihcing and "shorting-effect" is when core flips polarity to the coil it is inside, the caps is where it goes to and is stored up,  and the caps go to load (motor coils) when caps are not connected to "source" because of the odd vs even Muller thing.

Anywas great work great scope shots...

try "bidirectional" mosfets! I think you are only catching half the power you can get....can this be done in yorus??

does you mosfet switch from a coil signal source like in LIDMOTORS video??? Or is it halleffect driven - I dindt see "how" it swtihces form your circuit diagram cople days ago I though maybe it was something automatic like joule theif dont know....

[mscoffman]

A question on diodes.  Romeruk said at first he was using 1N4007 diodes but later said it was 1N4001 diodes on top of the FWBR's.  Looking at the datasheets I see NO difference at all between these two other than the voltage rating.  Can anyone comment or speculate on whether there would be an advantage to using the lower voltage rating?

One place where it would make sense to do this is if the diodes where
Schotky diodes with reduced diode junction threshold voltage on top of
a higher current standard silicon bridge rectifier.

The high current bridge would not be excersized untill the voltage
across it was fairly high. The bridge would then "take over" current
from the schotky diodes. It makes sense if you want increased
efficiency combined with higher currents.

:S:MarkSCoffman

[keykhin]

A question on diodes.  Romeruk said at first he was using 1N4007 diodes but later said it was 1N4001 diodes on top of the FWBR's.  Looking at the datasheets I see NO difference at all between these two other than the voltage rating.  Can anyone comment or speculate on whether there would be an advantage to using the lower voltage rating?

To all FE researchers !! STOP fooling around with 1N4007 diodes, they are CRAP !! Please do yourself a favor and use Schottky rectifiers. They have low power loss, high efficiency and high surge capacity. Check out for example MBR2060CT from Fairchild Semiconductor or equivalent.

[Collapsingfield]

To the diode question: the bigger rectifier bridge has lower forward voltage at the same current. But the 1n4007-4001 is faster. It will open earlier. The combination of the two is fast at switching and effective with the lower forward voltage after opening at the higher current.
I have tested, it is really good combination.
Regards
Collapsingfield
ps: 1n4001 is a littlebit faster as 1n4007.

[keykhin]

I propose a double rail coil driver circuit that I use to power my Muller dynamo replica. Soon I will make some pictures and a youtube video. Good luck everyone!